Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations
Abstract Public organisations are fundamental actors in migrant incorporation processes, as they are in charge of assessing migrants’ entitlement and providing access to welfare services. While a lot has been written on the individual determinants of street-level decisions, the role of organisationa...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Comparative Migration Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00224-6 |
id |
doaj-8e60b08e61e44ee1921182c8804fcd5e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8e60b08e61e44ee1921182c8804fcd5e2021-05-02T11:49:04ZengSpringerOpenComparative Migration Studies2214-594X2021-04-019111810.1186/s40878-021-00224-6Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisationsRoberta Perna0Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas – Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (CSIC-IPP)Abstract Public organisations are fundamental actors in migrant incorporation processes, as they are in charge of assessing migrants’ entitlement and providing access to welfare services. While a lot has been written on the individual determinants of street-level decisions, the role of organisational and institutional factors in shaping implementation practices has received little attention so far. By linking the street-level bureaucracy approach and the neo-institutionalist perspective in organisational analysis, this article investigates how public organisations mediate migrant incorporation processes in the field of healthcare. Drawing on a comparative ethnographic study of three public health organisations in an Italian region, the paper suggests that, in times of institutional tensions, managers’ priorities and framings of the issue, the ways they respond to decision-makers’ goals and allocate resources for implementing them, orient - and lead to variation in - street-level healthcare practices of in/exclusion for migrants with irregular status.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00224-6Healthcare in/exclusionInstitutional tensionsOrganisationsHigh-level managersStreet-level bureaucracyItaly |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roberta Perna |
spellingShingle |
Roberta Perna Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations Comparative Migration Studies Healthcare in/exclusion Institutional tensions Organisations High-level managers Street-level bureaucracy Italy |
author_facet |
Roberta Perna |
author_sort |
Roberta Perna |
title |
Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations |
title_short |
Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations |
title_full |
Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations |
title_fullStr |
Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations |
title_sort |
street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three italian public organisations |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Comparative Migration Studies |
issn |
2214-594X |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Public organisations are fundamental actors in migrant incorporation processes, as they are in charge of assessing migrants’ entitlement and providing access to welfare services. While a lot has been written on the individual determinants of street-level decisions, the role of organisational and institutional factors in shaping implementation practices has received little attention so far. By linking the street-level bureaucracy approach and the neo-institutionalist perspective in organisational analysis, this article investigates how public organisations mediate migrant incorporation processes in the field of healthcare. Drawing on a comparative ethnographic study of three public health organisations in an Italian region, the paper suggests that, in times of institutional tensions, managers’ priorities and framings of the issue, the ways they respond to decision-makers’ goals and allocate resources for implementing them, orient - and lead to variation in - street-level healthcare practices of in/exclusion for migrants with irregular status. |
topic |
Healthcare in/exclusion Institutional tensions Organisations High-level managers Street-level bureaucracy Italy |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00224-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robertaperna streetlevelworkersmanagersandinstitutionaltensionsacomparativeethnographyofhealthcarepracticesofinexclusioninthreeitalianpublicorganisations |
_version_ |
1721491666589712384 |