Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations

Abstract Public organisations are fundamental actors in migrant incorporation processes, as they are in charge of assessing migrants’ entitlement and providing access to welfare services. While a lot has been written on the individual determinants of street-level decisions, the role of organisationa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roberta Perna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-04-01
Series:Comparative Migration Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00224-6
id doaj-8e60b08e61e44ee1921182c8804fcd5e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e60b08e61e44ee1921182c8804fcd5e2021-05-02T11:49:04ZengSpringerOpenComparative Migration Studies2214-594X2021-04-019111810.1186/s40878-021-00224-6Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisationsRoberta Perna0Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas – Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (CSIC-IPP)Abstract Public organisations are fundamental actors in migrant incorporation processes, as they are in charge of assessing migrants’ entitlement and providing access to welfare services. While a lot has been written on the individual determinants of street-level decisions, the role of organisational and institutional factors in shaping implementation practices has received little attention so far. By linking the street-level bureaucracy approach and the neo-institutionalist perspective in organisational analysis, this article investigates how public organisations mediate migrant incorporation processes in the field of healthcare. Drawing on a comparative ethnographic study of three public health organisations in an Italian region, the paper suggests that, in times of institutional tensions, managers’ priorities and framings of the issue, the ways they respond to decision-makers’ goals and allocate resources for implementing them, orient - and lead to variation in - street-level healthcare practices of in/exclusion for migrants with irregular status.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00224-6Healthcare in/exclusionInstitutional tensionsOrganisationsHigh-level managersStreet-level bureaucracyItaly
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roberta Perna
spellingShingle Roberta Perna
Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations
Comparative Migration Studies
Healthcare in/exclusion
Institutional tensions
Organisations
High-level managers
Street-level bureaucracy
Italy
author_facet Roberta Perna
author_sort Roberta Perna
title Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations
title_short Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations
title_full Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations
title_fullStr Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations
title_full_unstemmed Street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three Italian public organisations
title_sort street-level workers, managers and institutional tensions: a comparative ethnography of healthcare practices of in/exclusion in three italian public organisations
publisher SpringerOpen
series Comparative Migration Studies
issn 2214-594X
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Public organisations are fundamental actors in migrant incorporation processes, as they are in charge of assessing migrants’ entitlement and providing access to welfare services. While a lot has been written on the individual determinants of street-level decisions, the role of organisational and institutional factors in shaping implementation practices has received little attention so far. By linking the street-level bureaucracy approach and the neo-institutionalist perspective in organisational analysis, this article investigates how public organisations mediate migrant incorporation processes in the field of healthcare. Drawing on a comparative ethnographic study of three public health organisations in an Italian region, the paper suggests that, in times of institutional tensions, managers’ priorities and framings of the issue, the ways they respond to decision-makers’ goals and allocate resources for implementing them, orient - and lead to variation in - street-level healthcare practices of in/exclusion for migrants with irregular status.
topic Healthcare in/exclusion
Institutional tensions
Organisations
High-level managers
Street-level bureaucracy
Italy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00224-6
work_keys_str_mv AT robertaperna streetlevelworkersmanagersandinstitutionaltensionsacomparativeethnographyofhealthcarepracticesofinexclusioninthreeitalianpublicorganisations
_version_ 1721491666589712384