Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging
It is generally acknowledged that calibration of the imaging system (be it a SPECT or a PET scanner) is one of the critical components associated with in vivo activity quantification in nuclear medicine. The system calibration is generally performed through the acquisition of a source with a known a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9830386 |
id |
doaj-8e5175428fa0425d87dbbbf25a678454 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8e5175428fa0425d87dbbbf25a6784542020-11-25T01:08:52ZengHindawi LimitedComputational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine1748-670X1748-67182017-01-01201710.1155/2017/98303869830386Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative ImagingMarco D’Arienzo0Maurice Cox1ENEA, National Institute of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, ItalyNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, UKIt is generally acknowledged that calibration of the imaging system (be it a SPECT or a PET scanner) is one of the critical components associated with in vivo activity quantification in nuclear medicine. The system calibration is generally performed through the acquisition of a source with a known amount of radioactivity. The decay-corrected calibration factor is the “output” quantity in a measurement model for the process. This quantity is a function of a number of “input” variables, including total counts in the volume of interest (VOI), radionuclide activity concentration, source volume, acquisition duration, radionuclide half-life, and calibration time of the radionuclide. Uncertainties in the input variables propagate through the calculation to the “combined” uncertainty in the output quantity. In the present study, using the general formula given in the GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement) for aggregating uncertainty components, we derive a practical relation to assess the combined standard uncertainty for the calibration factor of an emission tomography system. At a time of increasing need for accuracy in quantification studies, the proposed approach has the potential to be easily implemented in clinical practice.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9830386 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marco D’Arienzo Maurice Cox |
spellingShingle |
Marco D’Arienzo Maurice Cox Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine |
author_facet |
Marco D’Arienzo Maurice Cox |
author_sort |
Marco D’Arienzo |
title |
Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging |
title_short |
Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging |
title_full |
Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging |
title_fullStr |
Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging |
title_sort |
uncertainty analysis in the calibration of an emission tomography system for quantitative imaging |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine |
issn |
1748-670X 1748-6718 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
It is generally acknowledged that calibration of the imaging system (be it a SPECT or a PET scanner) is one of the critical components associated with in vivo activity quantification in nuclear medicine. The system calibration is generally performed through the acquisition of a source with a known amount of radioactivity. The decay-corrected calibration factor is the “output” quantity in a measurement model for the process. This quantity is a function of a number of “input” variables, including total counts in the volume of interest (VOI), radionuclide activity concentration, source volume, acquisition duration, radionuclide half-life, and calibration time of the radionuclide. Uncertainties in the input variables propagate through the calculation to the “combined” uncertainty in the output quantity. In the present study, using the general formula given in the GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement) for aggregating uncertainty components, we derive a practical relation to assess the combined standard uncertainty for the calibration factor of an emission tomography system. At a time of increasing need for accuracy in quantification studies, the proposed approach has the potential to be easily implemented in clinical practice. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9830386 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcodarienzo uncertaintyanalysisinthecalibrationofanemissiontomographysystemforquantitativeimaging AT mauricecox uncertaintyanalysisinthecalibrationofanemissiontomographysystemforquantitativeimaging |
_version_ |
1725181112701943808 |