Project and Community Management in Polar Sciences – Challenges and Opportunities

<p>Because geoscientific research often occurs via community-instigated bursts of activity with multi-investigator collaborations variously labelled as e.g., years (The International Polar Year IPY), experiments (World Ocean Circulation Experiment WOCE), programs (International Ocean Discovery...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Werner, Y. Zaika, A. K. Pavlov, S. Lidström, A. Pope, R. Badhe, M. Brückner, L. Cristini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-04-01
Series:Advances in Geosciences
Online Access:https://www.adv-geosci.net/46/25/2019/adgeo-46-25-2019.pdf
id doaj-8e5038fb5cf74e1f9ba22dd35338d047
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e5038fb5cf74e1f9ba22dd35338d0472020-11-24T21:37:54ZengCopernicus PublicationsAdvances in Geosciences1680-73401680-73592019-04-0146254310.5194/adgeo-46-25-2019Project and Community Management in Polar Sciences – Challenges and OpportunitiesK. Werner0Y. Zaika1A. K. Pavlov2A. K. Pavlov3S. Lidström4A. Pope5R. Badhe6M. Brückner7L. Cristini8Year of Polar Prediction International Coordination Office, Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, GermanyKhibiny Research Station, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, RussiaInstitute of Oceanology Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, PolandAkvaplan-niva, Tromsø, NorwayNorwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, NorwayInternational Arctic Science Committee IASC Executive Secretariat, Akureyri, IcelandEuropean Polar Board, The Hague, the Netherlands(AC) Scientific Coordination Office, Institute for Meteorology, University of Leipzig, GermanyAPPLICATE Project Management Office, Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany<p>Because geoscientific research often occurs via community-instigated bursts of activity with multi-investigator collaborations variously labelled as e.g., years (The International Polar Year IPY), experiments (World Ocean Circulation Experiment WOCE), programs (International Ocean Discovery Program), missions (CRYOSAT spacecraft), or decades (The International Decade of Ocean Exploration IDOE), successful attainment of research goals generally requires skilful scientific project management. In addition to the usual challenges of matching scientific ambitions to limited resources, on-going coordination and specifically project management, planning and implementation of polar science projects often involve many uncertainties caused by, for example, unpredictable weather or ocean and sea ice conditions, large-scale logistical juggling; and often these collaborations are spatially distributed and take place virtually. Large amounts of funding are needed to procure the considerable infrastructure and technical equipment required for polar expeditions; permissions to enter certain regions must be requested; and potential risks for expedition members as well as technical issues in extreme environments need to be considered. All these aspects are challenging for polar science projects, which therefore need a well thought-through program including a realistic alternative “plan B” and possibly also a “plan C” and “plan D”.</p> <p>The four most challenging overarching themes in polar science project management have been identified: international cooperation, interdisciplinarity, infrastructure, and community management. In this paper, we address ongoing challenges and opportunities in polar science project management based on a survey among 199 project and community managers and an additional of 85 project team members active in the field of polar sciences. Case studies and survey results are discussed with the conclusive goal to provide recommendations on how to fully reach the potential of polar sciences project and community management.</p>https://www.adv-geosci.net/46/25/2019/adgeo-46-25-2019.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. Werner
Y. Zaika
A. K. Pavlov
A. K. Pavlov
S. Lidström
A. Pope
R. Badhe
M. Brückner
L. Cristini
spellingShingle K. Werner
Y. Zaika
A. K. Pavlov
A. K. Pavlov
S. Lidström
A. Pope
R. Badhe
M. Brückner
L. Cristini
Project and Community Management in Polar Sciences – Challenges and Opportunities
Advances in Geosciences
author_facet K. Werner
Y. Zaika
A. K. Pavlov
A. K. Pavlov
S. Lidström
A. Pope
R. Badhe
M. Brückner
L. Cristini
author_sort K. Werner
title Project and Community Management in Polar Sciences – Challenges and Opportunities
title_short Project and Community Management in Polar Sciences – Challenges and Opportunities
title_full Project and Community Management in Polar Sciences – Challenges and Opportunities
title_fullStr Project and Community Management in Polar Sciences – Challenges and Opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Project and Community Management in Polar Sciences – Challenges and Opportunities
title_sort project and community management in polar sciences – challenges and opportunities
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Advances in Geosciences
issn 1680-7340
1680-7359
publishDate 2019-04-01
description <p>Because geoscientific research often occurs via community-instigated bursts of activity with multi-investigator collaborations variously labelled as e.g., years (The International Polar Year IPY), experiments (World Ocean Circulation Experiment WOCE), programs (International Ocean Discovery Program), missions (CRYOSAT spacecraft), or decades (The International Decade of Ocean Exploration IDOE), successful attainment of research goals generally requires skilful scientific project management. In addition to the usual challenges of matching scientific ambitions to limited resources, on-going coordination and specifically project management, planning and implementation of polar science projects often involve many uncertainties caused by, for example, unpredictable weather or ocean and sea ice conditions, large-scale logistical juggling; and often these collaborations are spatially distributed and take place virtually. Large amounts of funding are needed to procure the considerable infrastructure and technical equipment required for polar expeditions; permissions to enter certain regions must be requested; and potential risks for expedition members as well as technical issues in extreme environments need to be considered. All these aspects are challenging for polar science projects, which therefore need a well thought-through program including a realistic alternative “plan B” and possibly also a “plan C” and “plan D”.</p> <p>The four most challenging overarching themes in polar science project management have been identified: international cooperation, interdisciplinarity, infrastructure, and community management. In this paper, we address ongoing challenges and opportunities in polar science project management based on a survey among 199 project and community managers and an additional of 85 project team members active in the field of polar sciences. Case studies and survey results are discussed with the conclusive goal to provide recommendations on how to fully reach the potential of polar sciences project and community management.</p>
url https://www.adv-geosci.net/46/25/2019/adgeo-46-25-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kwerner projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
AT yzaika projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
AT akpavlov projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
AT akpavlov projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
AT slidstrom projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
AT apope projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
AT rbadhe projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
AT mbruckner projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
AT lcristini projectandcommunitymanagementinpolarscienceschallengesandopportunities
_version_ 1725936449007648768