Laser Welding and Syncristallization Techniques Comparison: In Vitro Study

Background. Laser welding was first reported in 1967 and for many years it has been used in dental laboratories with several advantages versus the conventional technique. Authors described, in previous works, the possibility of using also chair-side Nd : YAG laser device (Fotona Fidelis III, 𝜆=1064...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Fornaini, E. Merigo, P. Vescovi, M. Meleti, S. Nammour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/720538
id doaj-8e4aafbdb6c24ee69068ff214e2c7d6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e4aafbdb6c24ee69068ff214e2c7d6e2020-11-24T23:00:31ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/720538720538Laser Welding and Syncristallization Techniques Comparison: In Vitro StudyC. Fornaini0E. Merigo1P. Vescovi2M. Meleti3S. Nammour4Department of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, BelgiumOral Medicine and Laser-Assisted Surgery Unit, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 12-143121 Parma, ItalyOral Medicine and Laser-Assisted Surgery Unit, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 12-143121 Parma, ItalyOral Medicine and Laser-Assisted Surgery Unit, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 12-143121 Parma, ItalyDepartment of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, BelgiumBackground. Laser welding was first reported in 1967 and for many years it has been used in dental laboratories with several advantages versus the conventional technique. Authors described, in previous works, the possibility of using also chair-side Nd : YAG laser device (Fotona Fidelis III, 𝜆=1064 nm) for welding metallic parts of prosthetic appliances directly in the dental office, extra- and also intra-orally. Syncristallisation is a soldering technique based on the creation of an electric arc between two electrodes and used to connect implants to bars intra-orally. Aim. The aim of this study was to compare two different laser welding devices with a soldering machine, all of these used in prosthetic dentistry. Material and Methods. In-lab Nd : YAG laser welding (group A = 12 samples), chair-side Nd : YAG laser welding (group B = 12 samples), and electrowelder (group C = 12 samples) were used. The tests were performed on 36 CrCoMo plates and the analysis consisted in evaluation, by microscopic observation, of the number of fissures in welded areas of groups A and B and in measurement of the welding strength in all the groups. The results were statistically analysed by means of one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests. Results. The means and standard deviations for the number of fissures in welded areas were 8.12±2.59 for group A and 5.20±1.38 for group B. The difference was statistical significant (𝑃=0.0023 at the level 95%). On the other hand, the means and standard deviations for the traction tests were 1185.50±288.56 N for group A, 896.41±120.84 N for group B, and 283.58±84.98 N for group C. The difference was statistical significant (𝑃=0.01 at the level 95%). Conclusion. The joint obtained by welding devices had a significant higher strength compared with that obtained by the electrowelder, and the comparison between the two laser devices used demonstrated that the chair-side Nd : YAG, even giving a lower strength to the joints, produced the lowest number of fissures in the welded area.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/720538
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Fornaini
E. Merigo
P. Vescovi
M. Meleti
S. Nammour
spellingShingle C. Fornaini
E. Merigo
P. Vescovi
M. Meleti
S. Nammour
Laser Welding and Syncristallization Techniques Comparison: In Vitro Study
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet C. Fornaini
E. Merigo
P. Vescovi
M. Meleti
S. Nammour
author_sort C. Fornaini
title Laser Welding and Syncristallization Techniques Comparison: In Vitro Study
title_short Laser Welding and Syncristallization Techniques Comparison: In Vitro Study
title_full Laser Welding and Syncristallization Techniques Comparison: In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Laser Welding and Syncristallization Techniques Comparison: In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Laser Welding and Syncristallization Techniques Comparison: In Vitro Study
title_sort laser welding and syncristallization techniques comparison: in vitro study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background. Laser welding was first reported in 1967 and for many years it has been used in dental laboratories with several advantages versus the conventional technique. Authors described, in previous works, the possibility of using also chair-side Nd : YAG laser device (Fotona Fidelis III, 𝜆=1064 nm) for welding metallic parts of prosthetic appliances directly in the dental office, extra- and also intra-orally. Syncristallisation is a soldering technique based on the creation of an electric arc between two electrodes and used to connect implants to bars intra-orally. Aim. The aim of this study was to compare two different laser welding devices with a soldering machine, all of these used in prosthetic dentistry. Material and Methods. In-lab Nd : YAG laser welding (group A = 12 samples), chair-side Nd : YAG laser welding (group B = 12 samples), and electrowelder (group C = 12 samples) were used. The tests were performed on 36 CrCoMo plates and the analysis consisted in evaluation, by microscopic observation, of the number of fissures in welded areas of groups A and B and in measurement of the welding strength in all the groups. The results were statistically analysed by means of one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests. Results. The means and standard deviations for the number of fissures in welded areas were 8.12±2.59 for group A and 5.20±1.38 for group B. The difference was statistical significant (𝑃=0.0023 at the level 95%). On the other hand, the means and standard deviations for the traction tests were 1185.50±288.56 N for group A, 896.41±120.84 N for group B, and 283.58±84.98 N for group C. The difference was statistical significant (𝑃=0.01 at the level 95%). Conclusion. The joint obtained by welding devices had a significant higher strength compared with that obtained by the electrowelder, and the comparison between the two laser devices used demonstrated that the chair-side Nd : YAG, even giving a lower strength to the joints, produced the lowest number of fissures in the welded area.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/720538
work_keys_str_mv AT cfornaini laserweldingandsyncristallizationtechniquescomparisoninvitrostudy
AT emerigo laserweldingandsyncristallizationtechniquescomparisoninvitrostudy
AT pvescovi laserweldingandsyncristallizationtechniquescomparisoninvitrostudy
AT mmeleti laserweldingandsyncristallizationtechniquescomparisoninvitrostudy
AT snammour laserweldingandsyncristallizationtechniquescomparisoninvitrostudy
_version_ 1725642118620250112