Control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing UAV using LQR, LQG and nonlinear control
This paper aim is to present a comparative study between Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) and nonlinear controllers for pitch control of a fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Due to a good stability margin and strong robustness LQR has been selected. LQG was ch...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2019-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/30/e3sconf_eeests-2019_02001.pdf |
id |
doaj-8e46a6384e0b42fcb41e2fa294f403de |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8e46a6384e0b42fcb41e2fa294f403de2021-03-02T09:26:13ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422019-01-011040200110.1051/e3sconf/201910402001e3sconf_eeests-2019_02001Control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing UAV using LQR, LQG and nonlinear controlIngabire AlineSklyarov Andrey A.This paper aim is to present a comparative study between Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) and nonlinear controllers for pitch control of a fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Due to a good stability margin and strong robustness LQR has been selected. LQG was chosen because is able to overcome external disturbances. Kalman Filter controller was also introduced to the fixed-wing UAV flight control. Further, we designed an autopilot that controls the pitch angle of the fixed-wing UAV. In the end, the control laws are simulated in Matlab/Simulink. The results obtained are compared to see which method is faster, more reliable and more robust.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/30/e3sconf_eeests-2019_02001.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ingabire Aline Sklyarov Andrey A. |
spellingShingle |
Ingabire Aline Sklyarov Andrey A. Control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing UAV using LQR, LQG and nonlinear control E3S Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Ingabire Aline Sklyarov Andrey A. |
author_sort |
Ingabire Aline |
title |
Control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing UAV using LQR, LQG and nonlinear control |
title_short |
Control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing UAV using LQR, LQG and nonlinear control |
title_full |
Control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing UAV using LQR, LQG and nonlinear control |
title_fullStr |
Control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing UAV using LQR, LQG and nonlinear control |
title_full_unstemmed |
Control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing UAV using LQR, LQG and nonlinear control |
title_sort |
control of longitudinal flight dynamics of a fixedwing uav using lqr, lqg and nonlinear control |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
E3S Web of Conferences |
issn |
2267-1242 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
This paper aim is to present a comparative study between Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) and nonlinear controllers for pitch control of a fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Due to a good stability margin and strong robustness LQR has been selected. LQG was chosen because is able to overcome external disturbances. Kalman Filter controller was also introduced to the fixed-wing UAV flight control. Further, we designed an autopilot that controls the pitch angle of the fixed-wing UAV. In the end, the control laws are simulated in Matlab/Simulink. The results obtained are compared to see which method is faster, more reliable and more robust. |
url |
https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2019/30/e3sconf_eeests-2019_02001.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ingabirealine controloflongitudinalflightdynamicsofafixedwinguavusinglqrlqgandnonlinearcontrol AT sklyarovandreya controloflongitudinalflightdynamicsofafixedwinguavusinglqrlqgandnonlinearcontrol |
_version_ |
1724239412714274816 |