A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs
This paper presents the findings from a systematic literature review on the quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The main research question was “How can the quality criteria for MOOCs identified in the analysed studies from the systematic literature review be best organised in a categoris...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5817 |
id |
doaj-8e2e894afa094d8abc08ce5d9c0a994a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8e2e894afa094d8abc08ce5d9c0a994a2021-06-01T00:45:53ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-05-01135817581710.3390/su13115817A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCsChristian M. Stracke0Giada Trisolini1Faculty of Educational Sciences, Open Universiteit, 6401 DL Heerlen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, ItalyThis paper presents the findings from a systematic literature review on the quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The main research question was “How can the quality criteria for MOOCs identified in the analysed studies from the systematic literature review be best organised in a categorisation scheme?” The systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA procedures. After conducting the screening and eligibility analysis according the pre-defined criteria, 103 studies were finally selected. The analysis was done in iterative cycles for continuous improvements of the assignments and clustering of the quality criteria. The final version was validated in consensus through the categorisation and assignment of all 103 studies in a consistent way to four dimensions (pedagogical, organisational, technological, and social) and their sub-categories. This quality framework can be re-used in future MOOC research and the discussion of the analysed studies provides a current literature overview on the quality of MOOCs.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5817massive open online courses (MOOCs)systematic literature reviewquality criteriadistance education and learningcategorization frameworkdigital learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christian M. Stracke Giada Trisolini |
spellingShingle |
Christian M. Stracke Giada Trisolini A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs Sustainability massive open online courses (MOOCs) systematic literature review quality criteria distance education and learning categorization framework digital learning |
author_facet |
Christian M. Stracke Giada Trisolini |
author_sort |
Christian M. Stracke |
title |
A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs |
title_short |
A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs |
title_full |
A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs |
title_fullStr |
A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs |
title_sort |
systematic literature review on the quality of moocs |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
This paper presents the findings from a systematic literature review on the quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The main research question was “How can the quality criteria for MOOCs identified in the analysed studies from the systematic literature review be best organised in a categorisation scheme?” The systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA procedures. After conducting the screening and eligibility analysis according the pre-defined criteria, 103 studies were finally selected. The analysis was done in iterative cycles for continuous improvements of the assignments and clustering of the quality criteria. The final version was validated in consensus through the categorisation and assignment of all 103 studies in a consistent way to four dimensions (pedagogical, organisational, technological, and social) and their sub-categories. This quality framework can be re-used in future MOOC research and the discussion of the analysed studies provides a current literature overview on the quality of MOOCs. |
topic |
massive open online courses (MOOCs) systematic literature review quality criteria distance education and learning categorization framework digital learning |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5817 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christianmstracke asystematicliteraturereviewonthequalityofmoocs AT giadatrisolini asystematicliteraturereviewonthequalityofmoocs AT christianmstracke systematicliteraturereviewonthequalityofmoocs AT giadatrisolini systematicliteraturereviewonthequalityofmoocs |
_version_ |
1721414003391987712 |