A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs

This paper presents the findings from a systematic literature review on the quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The main research question was “How can the quality criteria for MOOCs identified in the analysed studies from the systematic literature review be best organised in a categoris...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian M. Stracke, Giada Trisolini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5817
id doaj-8e2e894afa094d8abc08ce5d9c0a994a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e2e894afa094d8abc08ce5d9c0a994a2021-06-01T00:45:53ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-05-01135817581710.3390/su13115817A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCsChristian M. Stracke0Giada Trisolini1Faculty of Educational Sciences, Open Universiteit, 6401 DL Heerlen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, ItalyThis paper presents the findings from a systematic literature review on the quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The main research question was “How can the quality criteria for MOOCs identified in the analysed studies from the systematic literature review be best organised in a categorisation scheme?” The systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA procedures. After conducting the screening and eligibility analysis according the pre-defined criteria, 103 studies were finally selected. The analysis was done in iterative cycles for continuous improvements of the assignments and clustering of the quality criteria. The final version was validated in consensus through the categorisation and assignment of all 103 studies in a consistent way to four dimensions (pedagogical, organisational, technological, and social) and their sub-categories. This quality framework can be re-used in future MOOC research and the discussion of the analysed studies provides a current literature overview on the quality of MOOCs.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5817massive open online courses (MOOCs)systematic literature reviewquality criteriadistance education and learningcategorization frameworkdigital learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian M. Stracke
Giada Trisolini
spellingShingle Christian M. Stracke
Giada Trisolini
A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs
Sustainability
massive open online courses (MOOCs)
systematic literature review
quality criteria
distance education and learning
categorization framework
digital learning
author_facet Christian M. Stracke
Giada Trisolini
author_sort Christian M. Stracke
title A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs
title_short A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs
title_full A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs
title_fullStr A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs
title_sort systematic literature review on the quality of moocs
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-05-01
description This paper presents the findings from a systematic literature review on the quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The main research question was “How can the quality criteria for MOOCs identified in the analysed studies from the systematic literature review be best organised in a categorisation scheme?” The systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA procedures. After conducting the screening and eligibility analysis according the pre-defined criteria, 103 studies were finally selected. The analysis was done in iterative cycles for continuous improvements of the assignments and clustering of the quality criteria. The final version was validated in consensus through the categorisation and assignment of all 103 studies in a consistent way to four dimensions (pedagogical, organisational, technological, and social) and their sub-categories. This quality framework can be re-used in future MOOC research and the discussion of the analysed studies provides a current literature overview on the quality of MOOCs.
topic massive open online courses (MOOCs)
systematic literature review
quality criteria
distance education and learning
categorization framework
digital learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5817
work_keys_str_mv AT christianmstracke asystematicliteraturereviewonthequalityofmoocs
AT giadatrisolini asystematicliteraturereviewonthequalityofmoocs
AT christianmstracke systematicliteraturereviewonthequalityofmoocs
AT giadatrisolini systematicliteraturereviewonthequalityofmoocs
_version_ 1721414003391987712