Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art
In this article, I consider Michael Fried’s recent contribution to the debate about the experience of video art, made in relation to the work of Douglas Gordon. Fried speculates that issues of antitheatricality may in fact be key to specifying the medium of video installation. While Fried’s position...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Helsinki University Press
2012-05-01
|
Series: | Estetika |
Online Access: | https://estetikajournal.org/articles/88 |
id |
doaj-8e2ddaa659a1476eae138be499c2389e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8e2ddaa659a1476eae138be499c2389e2020-11-25T03:31:11ZengHelsinki University PressEstetika 2571-09152012-05-0149152510.33134/eeja.8878Michael Fried and Beholding Video ArtKen Wilder0Chelsea College of Art & Design, University of the Arts London, 16 John Islip Street, London, SW1P 4JUIn this article, I consider Michael Fried’s recent contribution to the debate about the experience of video art, made in relation to the work of Douglas Gordon. Fried speculates that issues of antitheatricality may in fact be key to specifying the medium of video installation. While Fried’s position on awork’s to-be-seenness offers a useful way of framing the relation with the beholder in video art, I question his notion of ‘overcoming’ theatricality – preferring to see the theatrical/antitheatrical dichotomy as a dynamic at play within individual works. I welcome what seems to be an explicit acknowledgment from Fried that the position of the spectator is a contributory factor in what he terms empathic projection, but relate this to the notion of a figural presence. I argue that video art, as a 'spatial' practice, offers a distinct mode of reception by problematizing the position of the spectator in relation to two-dimensional figurative space to which she is excluded.https://estetikajournal.org/articles/88 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ken Wilder |
spellingShingle |
Ken Wilder Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art Estetika |
author_facet |
Ken Wilder |
author_sort |
Ken Wilder |
title |
Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art |
title_short |
Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art |
title_full |
Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art |
title_fullStr |
Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art |
title_full_unstemmed |
Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art |
title_sort |
michael fried and beholding video art |
publisher |
Helsinki University Press |
series |
Estetika |
issn |
2571-0915 |
publishDate |
2012-05-01 |
description |
In this article, I consider Michael Fried’s recent contribution to the debate about the experience of video art, made in relation to the work of Douglas Gordon. Fried speculates that issues of antitheatricality may in fact be key to specifying the medium of video installation. While Fried’s position on awork’s to-be-seenness offers a useful way of framing the relation with the beholder in video art, I question his notion of ‘overcoming’ theatricality – preferring to see the theatrical/antitheatrical dichotomy as a dynamic at play within individual works. I welcome what seems to be an explicit acknowledgment from Fried that the position of the spectator is a contributory factor in what he terms empathic projection, but relate this to the notion of a figural presence. I argue that video art, as a 'spatial' practice, offers a distinct mode of reception by problematizing the position of the spectator in relation to two-dimensional figurative space to which she is excluded. |
url |
https://estetikajournal.org/articles/88 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kenwilder michaelfriedandbeholdingvideoart |
_version_ |
1724573046593814528 |