Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art

In this article, I consider Michael Fried’s recent contribution to the debate about the experience of video art, made in relation to the work of Douglas Gordon. Fried speculates that issues of antitheatricality may in fact be key to specifying the medium of video installation. While Fried’s position...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ken Wilder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Helsinki University Press 2012-05-01
Series:Estetika
Online Access:https://estetikajournal.org/articles/88
id doaj-8e2ddaa659a1476eae138be499c2389e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e2ddaa659a1476eae138be499c2389e2020-11-25T03:31:11ZengHelsinki University PressEstetika 2571-09152012-05-0149152510.33134/eeja.8878Michael Fried and Beholding Video ArtKen Wilder0Chelsea College of Art & Design, University of the Arts London, 16 John Islip Street, London, SW1P 4JUIn this article, I consider Michael Fried’s recent contribution to the debate about the experience of video art, made in relation to the work of Douglas Gordon. Fried speculates that issues of antitheatricality may in fact be key to specifying the medium of video installation. While Fried’s position on awork’s to-be-seenness offers a useful way of framing the relation with the beholder in video art, I question his notion of ‘overcoming’ theatricality – preferring to see the theatrical/antitheatrical dichotomy as a dynamic at play within individual works. I welcome what seems to be an explicit acknowledgment from Fried that the position of the spectator is a contributory factor in what he terms empathic projection, but relate this to the notion of a figural presence. I argue that video art, as a 'spatial' practice, offers a distinct mode of reception by problematizing the position of the spectator in relation to two-dimensional figurative space to which she is excluded.https://estetikajournal.org/articles/88
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ken Wilder
spellingShingle Ken Wilder
Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art
Estetika
author_facet Ken Wilder
author_sort Ken Wilder
title Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art
title_short Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art
title_full Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art
title_fullStr Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art
title_full_unstemmed Michael Fried and Beholding Video Art
title_sort michael fried and beholding video art
publisher Helsinki University Press
series Estetika
issn 2571-0915
publishDate 2012-05-01
description In this article, I consider Michael Fried’s recent contribution to the debate about the experience of video art, made in relation to the work of Douglas Gordon. Fried speculates that issues of antitheatricality may in fact be key to specifying the medium of video installation. While Fried’s position on awork’s to-be-seenness offers a useful way of framing the relation with the beholder in video art, I question his notion of ‘overcoming’ theatricality – preferring to see the theatrical/antitheatrical dichotomy as a dynamic at play within individual works. I welcome what seems to be an explicit acknowledgment from Fried that the position of the spectator is a contributory factor in what he terms empathic projection, but relate this to the notion of a figural presence. I argue that video art, as a 'spatial' practice, offers a distinct mode of reception by problematizing the position of the spectator in relation to two-dimensional figurative space to which she is excluded.
url https://estetikajournal.org/articles/88
work_keys_str_mv AT kenwilder michaelfriedandbeholdingvideoart
_version_ 1724573046593814528