A satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacy

A study of dayside auroral conjugacy has been done using the cleft/boundary layer auroral particle boundaries observed by the DMSP-F7 satellite in the southern hemisphere and the global UV auroral images taken by the Viking spacecraft in the northern hemisphere. The 22 events have been studied o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. B. Vo, J. S. Murphree, D. Hearn, P. T. Newell, C.-I. Meng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 1995-11-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/13/1134/1995/angeo-13-1134-1995.pdf
id doaj-8e264837880e4830960b0516650465c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e264837880e4830960b0516650465c72020-11-24T22:06:33ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05761995-11-01131134114310.1007/s00585-995-1134-4A satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacyH. B. VoJ. S. MurphreeD. HearnP. T. NewellC.-I. MengA study of dayside auroral conjugacy has been done using the cleft/boundary layer auroral particle boundaries observed by the DMSP-F7 satellite in the southern hemisphere and the global UV auroral images taken by the Viking spacecraft in the northern hemisphere. The 22 events have been studied on the basis of an internal IGRF 1985 magnetic field; it is shown that there is a displacement of up to 4<sup>°</sup> in latitude from the conjugate points with the northern aurora appearing to be located poleward of the conjugate point. No local time dependence of the north-south auroral location difference was seen. The use of a more realistic magnetic field model for tracing field lines which incorporates the dipole tilt angle and <i>Kp</i> index, the Tsyganenko 1987 long model plus the IGRF 1985 internal magnetic field model, appears to organize the data better. Although with this external plus internal model some tracings did not close in the opposite hemisphere, 70% of those that did indicated satisfactory conjugacy. The study shows that the degree of auroral conjugacy is dependent upon the accuracy of the magnetic field model used to trace to the conjugate point, especially in the dayside region where the field lines can either go to the dayside magnetopause near the subsolar point or sweep all the way back to the flanks of the magnetotail. Also the discrepancy in the latitude of northern and southern aurora can be partially explained by the displacement of the neutral sheet (source region of the aurora) by the dipole tilt effect.https://www.ann-geophys.net/13/1134/1995/angeo-13-1134-1995.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. B. Vo
J. S. Murphree
D. Hearn
P. T. Newell
C.-I. Meng
spellingShingle H. B. Vo
J. S. Murphree
D. Hearn
P. T. Newell
C.-I. Meng
A satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacy
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet H. B. Vo
J. S. Murphree
D. Hearn
P. T. Newell
C.-I. Meng
author_sort H. B. Vo
title A satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacy
title_short A satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacy
title_full A satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacy
title_fullStr A satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacy
title_full_unstemmed A satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacy
title_sort satellite study of dayside auroral conjugacy
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 1995-11-01
description A study of dayside auroral conjugacy has been done using the cleft/boundary layer auroral particle boundaries observed by the DMSP-F7 satellite in the southern hemisphere and the global UV auroral images taken by the Viking spacecraft in the northern hemisphere. The 22 events have been studied on the basis of an internal IGRF 1985 magnetic field; it is shown that there is a displacement of up to 4<sup>°</sup> in latitude from the conjugate points with the northern aurora appearing to be located poleward of the conjugate point. No local time dependence of the north-south auroral location difference was seen. The use of a more realistic magnetic field model for tracing field lines which incorporates the dipole tilt angle and <i>Kp</i> index, the Tsyganenko 1987 long model plus the IGRF 1985 internal magnetic field model, appears to organize the data better. Although with this external plus internal model some tracings did not close in the opposite hemisphere, 70% of those that did indicated satisfactory conjugacy. The study shows that the degree of auroral conjugacy is dependent upon the accuracy of the magnetic field model used to trace to the conjugate point, especially in the dayside region where the field lines can either go to the dayside magnetopause near the subsolar point or sweep all the way back to the flanks of the magnetotail. Also the discrepancy in the latitude of northern and southern aurora can be partially explained by the displacement of the neutral sheet (source region of the aurora) by the dipole tilt effect.
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/13/1134/1995/angeo-13-1134-1995.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hbvo asatellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT jsmurphree asatellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT dhearn asatellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT ptnewell asatellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT cimeng asatellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT hbvo satellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT jsmurphree satellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT dhearn satellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT ptnewell satellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
AT cimeng satellitestudyofdaysideauroralconjugacy
_version_ 1725823132443344896