One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
Abstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior mono-segment and short-segment fixation combined with one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting fusion in treating single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB). Methods Sixty-two patients with single-...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3115-x |
id |
doaj-8e114daad8a249088aed4d2e9803054e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8e114daad8a249088aed4d2e9803054e2021-02-07T12:19:19ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-02-012111910.1186/s12891-020-3115-xOne-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomesZheng Liu0Weiwei Li1Zhengchao Xu2Xiyang Wang3Hao Zeng4Department of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical UniversityAbstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior mono-segment and short-segment fixation combined with one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting fusion in treating single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB). Methods Sixty-two patients with single-segment LSTB treated by a posterior-only approach were divided into two groups: short-segment fixation (Group A, n = 32) and mono-segment fixation (Group B, n = 30). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, and hospitalization duration were lower in Group B than in Group A. All patients achieved the bony fusion criteria. The visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index were substantially improved 3 months postoperatively and at the last visit in both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Kirkaldy–Willis functional evaluation at the final follow-up demonstrated that all patients in both groups achieved excellent or good results. The difference in the angle correction rate and correction loss between Groups A and B was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment or short-segment fixation can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. Mono-segment fixation is more suitable for the treatment of single-segment LSTB because the lumbar segments with normal motion can be preserved with less trauma, a shorter operation time, shorter hospitalization, and lower costs.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3115-xPosteriorDebridementFusionShort-segment fixationMono-segment fixationSingle-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zheng Liu Weiwei Li Zhengchao Xu Xiyang Wang Hao Zeng |
spellingShingle |
Zheng Liu Weiwei Li Zhengchao Xu Xiyang Wang Hao Zeng One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Posterior Debridement Fusion Short-segment fixation Mono-segment fixation Single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis |
author_facet |
Zheng Liu Weiwei Li Zhengchao Xu Xiyang Wang Hao Zeng |
author_sort |
Zheng Liu |
title |
One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes |
title_short |
One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes |
title_full |
One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes |
title_fullStr |
One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed |
One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes |
title_sort |
one-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior mono-segment and short-segment fixation combined with one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting fusion in treating single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB). Methods Sixty-two patients with single-segment LSTB treated by a posterior-only approach were divided into two groups: short-segment fixation (Group A, n = 32) and mono-segment fixation (Group B, n = 30). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, and hospitalization duration were lower in Group B than in Group A. All patients achieved the bony fusion criteria. The visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index were substantially improved 3 months postoperatively and at the last visit in both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Kirkaldy–Willis functional evaluation at the final follow-up demonstrated that all patients in both groups achieved excellent or good results. The difference in the angle correction rate and correction loss between Groups A and B was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment or short-segment fixation can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. Mono-segment fixation is more suitable for the treatment of single-segment LSTB because the lumbar segments with normal motion can be preserved with less trauma, a shorter operation time, shorter hospitalization, and lower costs. |
topic |
Posterior Debridement Fusion Short-segment fixation Mono-segment fixation Single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3115-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zhengliu onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes AT weiweili onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes AT zhengchaoxu onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes AT xiyangwang onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes AT haozeng onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes |
_version_ |
1724281355512053760 |