One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes

Abstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior mono-segment and short-segment fixation combined with one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting fusion in treating single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB). Methods Sixty-two patients with single-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zheng Liu, Weiwei Li, Zhengchao Xu, Xiyang Wang, Hao Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3115-x
id doaj-8e114daad8a249088aed4d2e9803054e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e114daad8a249088aed4d2e9803054e2021-02-07T12:19:19ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-02-012111910.1186/s12891-020-3115-xOne-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomesZheng Liu0Weiwei Li1Zhengchao Xu2Xiyang Wang3Hao Zeng4Department of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical UniversityAbstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior mono-segment and short-segment fixation combined with one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting fusion in treating single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB). Methods Sixty-two patients with single-segment LSTB treated by a posterior-only approach were divided into two groups: short-segment fixation (Group A, n = 32) and mono-segment fixation (Group B, n = 30). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, and hospitalization duration were lower in Group B than in Group A. All patients achieved the bony fusion criteria. The visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index were substantially improved 3 months postoperatively and at the last visit in both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Kirkaldy–Willis functional evaluation at the final follow-up demonstrated that all patients in both groups achieved excellent or good results. The difference in the angle correction rate and correction loss between Groups A and B was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment or short-segment fixation can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. Mono-segment fixation is more suitable for the treatment of single-segment LSTB because the lumbar segments with normal motion can be preserved with less trauma, a shorter operation time, shorter hospitalization, and lower costs.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3115-xPosteriorDebridementFusionShort-segment fixationMono-segment fixationSingle-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zheng Liu
Weiwei Li
Zhengchao Xu
Xiyang Wang
Hao Zeng
spellingShingle Zheng Liu
Weiwei Li
Zhengchao Xu
Xiyang Wang
Hao Zeng
One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Posterior
Debridement
Fusion
Short-segment fixation
Mono-segment fixation
Single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis
author_facet Zheng Liu
Weiwei Li
Zhengchao Xu
Xiyang Wang
Hao Zeng
author_sort Zheng Liu
title One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
title_short One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
title_full One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
title_fullStr One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
title_full_unstemmed One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
title_sort one-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior mono-segment and short-segment fixation combined with one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting fusion in treating single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB). Methods Sixty-two patients with single-segment LSTB treated by a posterior-only approach were divided into two groups: short-segment fixation (Group A, n = 32) and mono-segment fixation (Group B, n = 30). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, and hospitalization duration were lower in Group B than in Group A. All patients achieved the bony fusion criteria. The visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index were substantially improved 3 months postoperatively and at the last visit in both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Kirkaldy–Willis functional evaluation at the final follow-up demonstrated that all patients in both groups achieved excellent or good results. The difference in the angle correction rate and correction loss between Groups A and B was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment or short-segment fixation can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. Mono-segment fixation is more suitable for the treatment of single-segment LSTB because the lumbar segments with normal motion can be preserved with less trauma, a shorter operation time, shorter hospitalization, and lower costs.
topic Posterior
Debridement
Fusion
Short-segment fixation
Mono-segment fixation
Single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3115-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengliu onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes
AT weiweili onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes
AT zhengchaoxu onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes
AT xiyangwang onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes
AT haozeng onestageposteriordebridementbonegraftingfusionandmonosegmentvsshortsegmentfixationforsinglesegmentlumbarspinaltuberculosisminimum5yearfollowupoutcomes
_version_ 1724281355512053760