The Midfoot Contributes to Power and Work During Single-limb Heel Rise

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Single-limb heel rise (HR) is used to evaluate muscle performance and clinical outcomes in people with foot and ankle pathology. While the midfoot contributes 13% of total foot/ankle work to forward propulsion during gait, healthy HR performance remai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank DiLiberto PT, PhD, Deborah Nawoczenski PhD, PT
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-09-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00043
id doaj-8e0f1eb484cb4496b1203b8c41df98e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e0f1eb484cb4496b1203b8c41df98e52020-11-25T03:40:40ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142018-09-01310.1177/2473011418S00043The Midfoot Contributes to Power and Work During Single-limb Heel RiseFrank DiLiberto PT, PhDDeborah Nawoczenski PhD, PTCategory: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Single-limb heel rise (HR) is used to evaluate muscle performance and clinical outcomes in people with foot and ankle pathology. While the midfoot contributes 13% of total foot/ankle work to forward propulsion during gait, healthy HR performance remains primarily characterized by ankle function. Similar to its function during gait, the midfoot may also generate power during HR to provide the stability needed for ankle push-off power. Further characterization of HR performance by evaluating midfoot kinetics may advance understanding of foot function in the clinical application of the HR task. The purpose of this study was to examine ankle and midfoot power and work during single-limb HR in healthy adults. Methods: Twelve healthy adults [Mean (SD): Age 31.3 (4.9) years; BMI 25.2 (3.3) Kg/m2; 50% male] performed twenty barefoot single-limb heel rises. Multi-segment kinematic and ground reaction force data were recorded with an electromagnetic motion capture system and force plate. Subject-specific, three segment foot models (tibia, rearfoot, forefoot) were derived. Inverse dynamic calculations were performed to obtain ankle and midfoot peak positive and negative powers (joint torque x segmental velocity), as well as the timing of peak powers (% of the heel rise). Midfoot work (integral of power with respect to time), reflecting energy production, was examined as a percentage of the entire work performed at the ankle and midfoot during HR. Group descriptive data were examined as mean (standard deviation) [95% confidence interval]. Results: Ankle peak positive power was 2.8 (0.8) [2.2 - 3.3] W/Kg and occurred during the ascent phase at 7% HR (Figure 1). Midfoot peak positive power was 0.5 (0.2) [0.3 - 0.6] W/Kg occurring at 6%. Ankle peak negative power was 2.1 (0.6) [1.7 - 2.4] W/Kg and occurred during the descent phase at 84% HR. Midfoot peak negative power was 0.4 (0.2) [0.2 - 0.5] W/Kg occurring at 83%. The proportion of midfoot work to total work performed was 13.5 (5.7) [9.8 - 17.1] %. Conclusion: Study findings advance understanding of foot function by demonstrating the contribution of midfoot power and work during HR in healthy adults. Midfoot peak powers were approximately 18% of ankle powers and occurred at similar times during HR. Further, midfoot energy production appears to be an important aspect of healthy HR performance because approximately 14% of the total foot/ankle work occurs at the midfoot. Since active internal muscle and ligament mechanisms are attributed to midfoot power generation, practitioners should consider midfoot tissue loading and muscle performance when implementing the HR task in clinical practice.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00043
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frank DiLiberto PT, PhD
Deborah Nawoczenski PhD, PT
spellingShingle Frank DiLiberto PT, PhD
Deborah Nawoczenski PhD, PT
The Midfoot Contributes to Power and Work During Single-limb Heel Rise
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
author_facet Frank DiLiberto PT, PhD
Deborah Nawoczenski PhD, PT
author_sort Frank DiLiberto PT, PhD
title The Midfoot Contributes to Power and Work During Single-limb Heel Rise
title_short The Midfoot Contributes to Power and Work During Single-limb Heel Rise
title_full The Midfoot Contributes to Power and Work During Single-limb Heel Rise
title_fullStr The Midfoot Contributes to Power and Work During Single-limb Heel Rise
title_full_unstemmed The Midfoot Contributes to Power and Work During Single-limb Heel Rise
title_sort midfoot contributes to power and work during single-limb heel rise
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
issn 2473-0114
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Single-limb heel rise (HR) is used to evaluate muscle performance and clinical outcomes in people with foot and ankle pathology. While the midfoot contributes 13% of total foot/ankle work to forward propulsion during gait, healthy HR performance remains primarily characterized by ankle function. Similar to its function during gait, the midfoot may also generate power during HR to provide the stability needed for ankle push-off power. Further characterization of HR performance by evaluating midfoot kinetics may advance understanding of foot function in the clinical application of the HR task. The purpose of this study was to examine ankle and midfoot power and work during single-limb HR in healthy adults. Methods: Twelve healthy adults [Mean (SD): Age 31.3 (4.9) years; BMI 25.2 (3.3) Kg/m2; 50% male] performed twenty barefoot single-limb heel rises. Multi-segment kinematic and ground reaction force data were recorded with an electromagnetic motion capture system and force plate. Subject-specific, three segment foot models (tibia, rearfoot, forefoot) were derived. Inverse dynamic calculations were performed to obtain ankle and midfoot peak positive and negative powers (joint torque x segmental velocity), as well as the timing of peak powers (% of the heel rise). Midfoot work (integral of power with respect to time), reflecting energy production, was examined as a percentage of the entire work performed at the ankle and midfoot during HR. Group descriptive data were examined as mean (standard deviation) [95% confidence interval]. Results: Ankle peak positive power was 2.8 (0.8) [2.2 - 3.3] W/Kg and occurred during the ascent phase at 7% HR (Figure 1). Midfoot peak positive power was 0.5 (0.2) [0.3 - 0.6] W/Kg occurring at 6%. Ankle peak negative power was 2.1 (0.6) [1.7 - 2.4] W/Kg and occurred during the descent phase at 84% HR. Midfoot peak negative power was 0.4 (0.2) [0.2 - 0.5] W/Kg occurring at 83%. The proportion of midfoot work to total work performed was 13.5 (5.7) [9.8 - 17.1] %. Conclusion: Study findings advance understanding of foot function by demonstrating the contribution of midfoot power and work during HR in healthy adults. Midfoot peak powers were approximately 18% of ankle powers and occurred at similar times during HR. Further, midfoot energy production appears to be an important aspect of healthy HR performance because approximately 14% of the total foot/ankle work occurs at the midfoot. Since active internal muscle and ligament mechanisms are attributed to midfoot power generation, practitioners should consider midfoot tissue loading and muscle performance when implementing the HR task in clinical practice.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00043
work_keys_str_mv AT frankdilibertoptphd themidfootcontributestopowerandworkduringsinglelimbheelrise
AT deborahnawoczenskiphdpt themidfootcontributestopowerandworkduringsinglelimbheelrise
AT frankdilibertoptphd midfootcontributestopowerandworkduringsinglelimbheelrise
AT deborahnawoczenskiphdpt midfootcontributestopowerandworkduringsinglelimbheelrise
_version_ 1724533613832175616