Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in gene expression were estimated in liver samples from 9 males and 9 females. The study tested 31,110 genes for a gender difference using a design that adjusted for sources of variation associated with cDNA arrays...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dial Stacey, Velasco Cruz, Delongchamp Robert R, Harris Angela J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-07-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
id doaj-8e07fe727a124244a472d8cd53a67afa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e07fe727a124244a472d8cd53a67afa2020-11-25T00:59:52ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052005-07-016Suppl 2S1310.1186/1471-2105-6-S2-S13Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysisDial StaceyVelasco CruzDelongchamp Robert RHarris Angela J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in gene expression were estimated in liver samples from 9 males and 9 females. The study tested 31,110 genes for a gender difference using a design that adjusted for sources of variation associated with cDNA arrays, normalization, hybridizations and processing conditions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The genes were split into 2,800 that were clearly expressed (expressed genes) and 28,310 that had expression levels in the background range (not expressed genes). The distribution of p-values from the 'not expressed' group was consistent with no gender differences. The distribution of p-values from the 'expressed' group suggested that 8 % of these genes differed by gender, but the estimated fold-changes (expression in males / expression in females) were small. The largest observed fold-change was 1.55. The 95 % confidence bounds on the estimated fold-changes were less than 1.4 fold for 79.3 %, and few (1.1%) exceed 2-fold.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Observed gender differences in gene expression were small. When selecting genes with gender differences based upon their p-values, false discovery rates exceed 80 % for any set of genes, essentially making it impossible to identify any specific genes with a gender difference.</p>
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dial Stacey
Velasco Cruz
Delongchamp Robert R
Harris Angela J
spellingShingle Dial Stacey
Velasco Cruz
Delongchamp Robert R
Harris Angela J
Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Dial Stacey
Velasco Cruz
Delongchamp Robert R
Harris Angela J
author_sort Dial Stacey
title Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis
title_short Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis
title_full Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis
title_fullStr Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis
title_full_unstemmed Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis
title_sort genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: statistical design and analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2005-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in gene expression were estimated in liver samples from 9 males and 9 females. The study tested 31,110 genes for a gender difference using a design that adjusted for sources of variation associated with cDNA arrays, normalization, hybridizations and processing conditions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The genes were split into 2,800 that were clearly expressed (expressed genes) and 28,310 that had expression levels in the background range (not expressed genes). The distribution of p-values from the 'not expressed' group was consistent with no gender differences. The distribution of p-values from the 'expressed' group suggested that 8 % of these genes differed by gender, but the estimated fold-changes (expression in males / expression in females) were small. The largest observed fold-change was 1.55. The 95 % confidence bounds on the estimated fold-changes were less than 1.4 fold for 79.3 %, and few (1.1%) exceed 2-fold.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Observed gender differences in gene expression were small. When selecting genes with gender differences based upon their p-values, false discovery rates exceed 80 % for any set of genes, essentially making it impossible to identify any specific genes with a gender difference.</p>
work_keys_str_mv AT dialstacey genomewideestimationofgenderdifferencesinthegeneexpressionofhumanliversstatisticaldesignandanalysis
AT velascocruz genomewideestimationofgenderdifferencesinthegeneexpressionofhumanliversstatisticaldesignandanalysis
AT delongchamprobertr genomewideestimationofgenderdifferencesinthegeneexpressionofhumanliversstatisticaldesignandanalysis
AT harrisangelaj genomewideestimationofgenderdifferencesinthegeneexpressionofhumanliversstatisticaldesignandanalysis
_version_ 1725215525411225600