Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in gene expression were estimated in liver samples from 9 males and 9 females. The study tested 31,110 genes for a gender difference using a design that adjusted for sources of variation associated with cDNA arrays...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2005-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Bioinformatics |
id |
doaj-8e07fe727a124244a472d8cd53a67afa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8e07fe727a124244a472d8cd53a67afa2020-11-25T00:59:52ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052005-07-016Suppl 2S1310.1186/1471-2105-6-S2-S13Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysisDial StaceyVelasco CruzDelongchamp Robert RHarris Angela J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in gene expression were estimated in liver samples from 9 males and 9 females. The study tested 31,110 genes for a gender difference using a design that adjusted for sources of variation associated with cDNA arrays, normalization, hybridizations and processing conditions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The genes were split into 2,800 that were clearly expressed (expressed genes) and 28,310 that had expression levels in the background range (not expressed genes). The distribution of p-values from the 'not expressed' group was consistent with no gender differences. The distribution of p-values from the 'expressed' group suggested that 8 % of these genes differed by gender, but the estimated fold-changes (expression in males / expression in females) were small. The largest observed fold-change was 1.55. The 95 % confidence bounds on the estimated fold-changes were less than 1.4 fold for 79.3 %, and few (1.1%) exceed 2-fold.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Observed gender differences in gene expression were small. When selecting genes with gender differences based upon their p-values, false discovery rates exceed 80 % for any set of genes, essentially making it impossible to identify any specific genes with a gender difference.</p> |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dial Stacey Velasco Cruz Delongchamp Robert R Harris Angela J |
spellingShingle |
Dial Stacey Velasco Cruz Delongchamp Robert R Harris Angela J Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis BMC Bioinformatics |
author_facet |
Dial Stacey Velasco Cruz Delongchamp Robert R Harris Angela J |
author_sort |
Dial Stacey |
title |
Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis |
title_short |
Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis |
title_full |
Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis |
title_fullStr |
Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: Statistical design and analysis |
title_sort |
genome-wide estimation of gender differences in the gene expression of human livers: statistical design and analysis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Bioinformatics |
issn |
1471-2105 |
publishDate |
2005-07-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in gene expression were estimated in liver samples from 9 males and 9 females. The study tested 31,110 genes for a gender difference using a design that adjusted for sources of variation associated with cDNA arrays, normalization, hybridizations and processing conditions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The genes were split into 2,800 that were clearly expressed (expressed genes) and 28,310 that had expression levels in the background range (not expressed genes). The distribution of p-values from the 'not expressed' group was consistent with no gender differences. The distribution of p-values from the 'expressed' group suggested that 8 % of these genes differed by gender, but the estimated fold-changes (expression in males / expression in females) were small. The largest observed fold-change was 1.55. The 95 % confidence bounds on the estimated fold-changes were less than 1.4 fold for 79.3 %, and few (1.1%) exceed 2-fold.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Observed gender differences in gene expression were small. When selecting genes with gender differences based upon their p-values, false discovery rates exceed 80 % for any set of genes, essentially making it impossible to identify any specific genes with a gender difference.</p> |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dialstacey genomewideestimationofgenderdifferencesinthegeneexpressionofhumanliversstatisticaldesignandanalysis AT velascocruz genomewideestimationofgenderdifferencesinthegeneexpressionofhumanliversstatisticaldesignandanalysis AT delongchamprobertr genomewideestimationofgenderdifferencesinthegeneexpressionofhumanliversstatisticaldesignandanalysis AT harrisangelaj genomewideestimationofgenderdifferencesinthegeneexpressionofhumanliversstatisticaldesignandanalysis |
_version_ |
1725215525411225600 |