Safety assessment of the process Veolia URRC used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials

• Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP), Vittorio Silano, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Riccardo Crebelli, David Michael Gott, Konrad Grob, Claude Lambré, Marcel Mengelers, Alicja Mortensen, Gilles Rivière, Inger‐Lise Steffensen, Christina Tlustos, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Holger Zorn, Vincent Dudler, Maria Rosaria Milana, Constantine Papaspyrides, Maria de Fátima Tavares Poças, Eric Barthélémy, Evgenia Lampi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020-05-01
• Series: EFSA Journal
• Subjects: food contact materials; plastic; poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET); recycling; URRC; safety assessment
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6125

Abstract The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP) assessed the safety of the recycling process Veolia (EU register number RECYC160) based on the URRC technology. The input material is hot caustic and surfactants‐washed and dried flakes obtained from collected post‐consumer PET containers, mainly bottles, containing no more than 5% of PET from non‐food applications. The flakes are coated with a sodium or potassium hydroxide solution, heated, then dried before being further heated in a continuous rotary reactor to a high temperature with a counter flow of air. The recycled flakes are intended to be used at up to 100% for the manufacture of new food packaging materials and articles, typically bottles and thermoformed sheets. These recycled materials and articles are intended to be used in direct contact with all kind of foodstuffs for long term storage at room temperature, with or without hotfill. The dossier does not satisfy the requirements of the EFSA guidelines. In particular, the Panel was unable to derive an adequate description and understanding of the main steps and the operating parameters of the technology. Furthermore, the Panel considered the challenge tests as not suitable for demonstrating the required cleaning efficiency of the process. Despite a request for clarification, fundamental issues were not satisfactorily addressed. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the process URRC Veolia is not adequately characterised. Based on the information submitted to EFSA, the applicant has not demonstrated in an adequately performed challenge test or by other appropriate evidence that the recycling process is able to reduce contamination of the PET flake input to a concentration that does not pose a risk to human health.