Optimasi Penempatan Recloser untuk Meningkatkan Keandalan Menggunakan Metode Virus Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (VEGA)

Kutampi Diesel Power Plant that supplies the Lembongan Island electrical system has a reliability value index that has not met the standard with SAIDI 95.85 hours / customer / year and SAIFI 76 times / customer / year while the WCS standard for SAIDI is 2.5 hours / customer / year and SAIFI is 3 tim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Novadianto Yudha Irawan, Anak Agung Ngurah Amrita, Widyadi Setiawan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Udayana 2018-05-01
Series:Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro
Online Access:https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/32751
id doaj-8df1ea65616f4d2c8606410ba0956c08
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8df1ea65616f4d2c8606410ba0956c082020-11-25T03:24:57ZengUniversitas UdayanaMajalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro1693-29512503-23722018-05-0117217718410.24843/MITE.2018.v17i02.P0332751Optimasi Penempatan Recloser untuk Meningkatkan Keandalan Menggunakan Metode Virus Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (VEGA)Novadianto Yudha IrawanAnak Agung Ngurah AmritaWidyadi SetiawanKutampi Diesel Power Plant that supplies the Lembongan Island electrical system has a reliability value index that has not met the standard with SAIDI 95.85 hours / customer / year and SAIFI 76 times / customer / year while the WCS standard for SAIDI is 2.5 hours / customer / year and SAIFI is 3 times / customers / year. Reliability value can be improved one of them by adding recloser. The addition of the recloser should pay attention to the area of frequent interference, the percentage of load and impedance of the electricity system. The VEGA method was used to determine the optimal recloser location by minimizing the SAIDI and SAIFI values. The result of the optimization method using VEGA shows optimal recloser location in the group 5 with the highest fitness 8,8396 with SAIDI 0,0070 hour / customer / year and SAIFI 0,0061 times / customer / year with program running time ± 3,6 minutes. These values indicate the VEGA method is more accurate than the fuzzy and genetic algorithm combination method but requires a longer running time.https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/32751
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Novadianto Yudha Irawan
Anak Agung Ngurah Amrita
Widyadi Setiawan
spellingShingle Novadianto Yudha Irawan
Anak Agung Ngurah Amrita
Widyadi Setiawan
Optimasi Penempatan Recloser untuk Meningkatkan Keandalan Menggunakan Metode Virus Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (VEGA)
Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro
author_facet Novadianto Yudha Irawan
Anak Agung Ngurah Amrita
Widyadi Setiawan
author_sort Novadianto Yudha Irawan
title Optimasi Penempatan Recloser untuk Meningkatkan Keandalan Menggunakan Metode Virus Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (VEGA)
title_short Optimasi Penempatan Recloser untuk Meningkatkan Keandalan Menggunakan Metode Virus Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (VEGA)
title_full Optimasi Penempatan Recloser untuk Meningkatkan Keandalan Menggunakan Metode Virus Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (VEGA)
title_fullStr Optimasi Penempatan Recloser untuk Meningkatkan Keandalan Menggunakan Metode Virus Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (VEGA)
title_full_unstemmed Optimasi Penempatan Recloser untuk Meningkatkan Keandalan Menggunakan Metode Virus Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (VEGA)
title_sort optimasi penempatan recloser untuk meningkatkan keandalan menggunakan metode virus evolutionary genetic algorithm (vega)
publisher Universitas Udayana
series Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro
issn 1693-2951
2503-2372
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Kutampi Diesel Power Plant that supplies the Lembongan Island electrical system has a reliability value index that has not met the standard with SAIDI 95.85 hours / customer / year and SAIFI 76 times / customer / year while the WCS standard for SAIDI is 2.5 hours / customer / year and SAIFI is 3 times / customers / year. Reliability value can be improved one of them by adding recloser. The addition of the recloser should pay attention to the area of frequent interference, the percentage of load and impedance of the electricity system. The VEGA method was used to determine the optimal recloser location by minimizing the SAIDI and SAIFI values. The result of the optimization method using VEGA shows optimal recloser location in the group 5 with the highest fitness 8,8396 with SAIDI 0,0070 hour / customer / year and SAIFI 0,0061 times / customer / year with program running time ± 3,6 minutes. These values indicate the VEGA method is more accurate than the fuzzy and genetic algorithm combination method but requires a longer running time.
url https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/32751
work_keys_str_mv AT novadiantoyudhairawan optimasipenempatanrecloseruntukmeningkatkankeandalanmenggunakanmetodevirusevolutionarygeneticalgorithmvega
AT anakagungngurahamrita optimasipenempatanrecloseruntukmeningkatkankeandalanmenggunakanmetodevirusevolutionarygeneticalgorithmvega
AT widyadisetiawan optimasipenempatanrecloseruntukmeningkatkankeandalanmenggunakanmetodevirusevolutionarygeneticalgorithmvega
_version_ 1724598912493289472