A randomized trial evaluating Prosaptide for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.

To examine the efficacy and safety of Prosaptide (PRO) for the treatment of painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathies (HIV-SN).A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in participants with sensory neuropathy. Pain modulating therapy was discontinued prior to baseline. Part...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott R Evans, David M Simpson, Douglas W Kitch, Agnes King, David B Clifford, Bruce A Cohen, Justin C McArthur, Neurologic AIDS Research Consortium, AIDS Clinical Trials Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-07-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1919427?pdf=render
id doaj-8dec7aa912914839b208b751bc9f7dbe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8dec7aa912914839b208b751bc9f7dbe2020-11-25T02:47:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-07-0126e55110.1371/journal.pone.0000551A randomized trial evaluating Prosaptide for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.Scott R EvansDavid M SimpsonDouglas W KitchAgnes KingDavid B CliffordBruce A CohenJustin C McArthurNeurologic AIDS Research ConsortiumAIDS Clinical Trials GroupTo examine the efficacy and safety of Prosaptide (PRO) for the treatment of painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathies (HIV-SN).A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in participants with sensory neuropathy. Pain modulating therapy was discontinued prior to baseline. Participants were stratified by sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude. Participants were trained to use an electronic diary (ED) to record pain.Peripheral neuropathies are common complications of HIV infection. The pathogenesis is unknown and currently treatments are restricted to symptomatic measures. We examined PRO against placebo (PBO) for treatment of painful HIV-SN and performed a post-hoc evaluation of an electronic diary (ED) to record HIV-associated neuropathic pain.Eligible participants included adults with neurologist-confirmed painful HIV-SN.2, 4, 8, or 16 mg/d PRO or PBO administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection for six weeks. Neurotoxic antiretroviral drug usage was held constant.Changes from baseline in the weekly average of evaluable daily random prompts measuring pain using the Gracely pain scale and adverse events.237 participants were randomized. The study was stopped after a planned futility analysis. There were no between-group differences in the frequency of adverse events or laboratory toxicities. The 6-week mean (sd) Gracely pain scale changes were -0.12 (0.23), -0.24 (0.35), -0.15 (0.32), -0.18 (0.34), and -0.18 (0.32) for the 2, 4, 8, 16 mg, and PBO arms respectively. A similar variability of pain changes recorded using the ED were noted compared to previous trials that used paper collection methods.6-week treatment with PRO was safe but not effective at reducing HIV-associated neuropathic pain. Use of an ED to record neuropathic pain is novel in HIV-SN, resulted in reasonable compliance in recording pain data, but did not decrease the variability of pain scores compared to historical paper collection methods.Current Controlled Trials NCT00286377.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1919427?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Scott R Evans
David M Simpson
Douglas W Kitch
Agnes King
David B Clifford
Bruce A Cohen
Justin C McArthur
Neurologic AIDS Research Consortium
AIDS Clinical Trials Group
spellingShingle Scott R Evans
David M Simpson
Douglas W Kitch
Agnes King
David B Clifford
Bruce A Cohen
Justin C McArthur
Neurologic AIDS Research Consortium
AIDS Clinical Trials Group
A randomized trial evaluating Prosaptide for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Scott R Evans
David M Simpson
Douglas W Kitch
Agnes King
David B Clifford
Bruce A Cohen
Justin C McArthur
Neurologic AIDS Research Consortium
AIDS Clinical Trials Group
author_sort Scott R Evans
title A randomized trial evaluating Prosaptide for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.
title_short A randomized trial evaluating Prosaptide for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.
title_full A randomized trial evaluating Prosaptide for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.
title_fullStr A randomized trial evaluating Prosaptide for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.
title_full_unstemmed A randomized trial evaluating Prosaptide for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.
title_sort randomized trial evaluating prosaptide for hiv-associated sensory neuropathies: use of an electronic diary to record neuropathic pain.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-07-01
description To examine the efficacy and safety of Prosaptide (PRO) for the treatment of painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathies (HIV-SN).A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in participants with sensory neuropathy. Pain modulating therapy was discontinued prior to baseline. Participants were stratified by sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude. Participants were trained to use an electronic diary (ED) to record pain.Peripheral neuropathies are common complications of HIV infection. The pathogenesis is unknown and currently treatments are restricted to symptomatic measures. We examined PRO against placebo (PBO) for treatment of painful HIV-SN and performed a post-hoc evaluation of an electronic diary (ED) to record HIV-associated neuropathic pain.Eligible participants included adults with neurologist-confirmed painful HIV-SN.2, 4, 8, or 16 mg/d PRO or PBO administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection for six weeks. Neurotoxic antiretroviral drug usage was held constant.Changes from baseline in the weekly average of evaluable daily random prompts measuring pain using the Gracely pain scale and adverse events.237 participants were randomized. The study was stopped after a planned futility analysis. There were no between-group differences in the frequency of adverse events or laboratory toxicities. The 6-week mean (sd) Gracely pain scale changes were -0.12 (0.23), -0.24 (0.35), -0.15 (0.32), -0.18 (0.34), and -0.18 (0.32) for the 2, 4, 8, 16 mg, and PBO arms respectively. A similar variability of pain changes recorded using the ED were noted compared to previous trials that used paper collection methods.6-week treatment with PRO was safe but not effective at reducing HIV-associated neuropathic pain. Use of an ED to record neuropathic pain is novel in HIV-SN, resulted in reasonable compliance in recording pain data, but did not decrease the variability of pain scores compared to historical paper collection methods.Current Controlled Trials NCT00286377.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1919427?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT scottrevans arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT davidmsimpson arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT douglaswkitch arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT agnesking arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT davidbclifford arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT bruceacohen arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT justincmcarthur arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT neurologicaidsresearchconsortium arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT aidsclinicaltrialsgroup arandomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT scottrevans randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT davidmsimpson randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT douglaswkitch randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT agnesking randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT davidbclifford randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT bruceacohen randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT justincmcarthur randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT neurologicaidsresearchconsortium randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
AT aidsclinicaltrialsgroup randomizedtrialevaluatingprosaptideforhivassociatedsensoryneuropathiesuseofanelectronicdiarytorecordneuropathicpain
_version_ 1724754762651402240