Systematic variation in reviewer practice according to country and gender in the field of ecology and evolution.
The characteristics of referees and the potential subsequent effects on the peer-review process are an important consideration for science since the integrity of the system depends on the appropriate evaluation of merit. In 2006, we conducted an online survey of 1334 ecologists and evolutionary biol...
Main Authors: | Olyana N Grod, Amber E Budden, Tom Tregenza, Julia Koricheva, Roosa Leimu, Lonnie W Aarssen, Christopher J Lortie |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2008-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2527679?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
by: Lonnie W Aarssen, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01) -
With great power comes great responsibility: the importance of rejection, power, and editors in the practice of scientific publishing.
by: Christopher J Lortie, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Are peer-review filters optimal for the progress of science in ecology and evolution?
by: Lonnie Aarssen
Published: (2012-05-01) -
Science Open Reviewed: An online community connecting authors with reviewers for journals
by: Lonnie Aarssen, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01) -
Ideas in Ecology and Evolution – A new open-access model dedicated to the rapid release of creativity in peer-review publication
by: Lonnie W. Aarssen
Published: (2008-12-01)