Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs

The sample consisted of 480 hatching eggs of Japanese quails and was divided into 4 groups. Before the transfer to the incubator, the first group was not disinfected (negative control). In the second group, eggs were disinfected by means of formaldehyde fumigation (positive control). In the third an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukasz Wlazlo, Kamil Drabik, Karrar I.A. Al-Shammari, Justyna Batkowska, Bozena Nowakowicz-Debek, Magdalena Gryzińska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-05-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579120300171
id doaj-8dc9ce14b72f4912961356714392540c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8dc9ce14b72f4912961356714392540c2020-11-25T03:32:44ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912020-05-0199524782484Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggsLukasz Wlazlo0Kamil Drabik1Karrar I.A. Al-Shammari2Justyna Batkowska3Bozena Nowakowicz-Debek4Magdalena Gryzińska5Department of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Hazards, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, PolandInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, PolandDepartment of Animal Production Techniques, Al-Musaib Technical College, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Babylon, IraqInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland; Corresponding author:Department of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Hazards, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, PolandInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, PolandThe sample consisted of 480 hatching eggs of Japanese quails and was divided into 4 groups. Before the transfer to the incubator, the first group was not disinfected (negative control). In the second group, eggs were disinfected by means of formaldehyde fumigation (positive control). In the third and fourth group, reactive oxygen forms were used for disinfection— perhydrol (H2O2) and ozone (O3), respectively. Eggs were incubated under standard conditions. On the 14th D, eggs were candled, and proportions of fertilized eggs and died embryos were calculated. In addition, samples were collected for microbiological examination. After 17.5 D, the results of the whole hatching were evaluated. Chicks were reared for 14 D. Their survivability and body weight gain were recorded. Disinfection by means of reactive oxygen forms did not prove to be more effective in reducing the number of bacterial colonies on the shell. Reduced hatching and significantly increased mortality in the O3 group may indicate the negative impact of this gas on developing embryos. The results of hatching from eggs disinfected with H2O2 did not differ from those obtained in control groups. The biggest chicks were obtained from O3 disinfected eggs. However, during rearing, their growth did not match the one observed for birds in the remaining groups. Chicks hatched from eggs disinfected with H2O2 were characterized by the largest survivability. Disinfection with reactive oxygen forms did not significantly improve the hygiene of hatching eggs, hatching performance, and quality of hatched chicks. Hydrogen peroxide, whose application offered satisfactory hatching results, may be the recommended disinfectant. On the other hand, O3 appears to be undesirable because of its negative impact on bird embryos.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579120300171ozonehydrogen peroxidedisinfectionhatching egg
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lukasz Wlazlo
Kamil Drabik
Karrar I.A. Al-Shammari
Justyna Batkowska
Bozena Nowakowicz-Debek
Magdalena Gryzińska
spellingShingle Lukasz Wlazlo
Kamil Drabik
Karrar I.A. Al-Shammari
Justyna Batkowska
Bozena Nowakowicz-Debek
Magdalena Gryzińska
Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs
Poultry Science
ozone
hydrogen peroxide
disinfection
hatching egg
author_facet Lukasz Wlazlo
Kamil Drabik
Karrar I.A. Al-Shammari
Justyna Batkowska
Bozena Nowakowicz-Debek
Magdalena Gryzińska
author_sort Lukasz Wlazlo
title Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs
title_short Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs
title_full Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs
title_fullStr Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs
title_full_unstemmed Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs
title_sort use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs
publisher Elsevier
series Poultry Science
issn 0032-5791
publishDate 2020-05-01
description The sample consisted of 480 hatching eggs of Japanese quails and was divided into 4 groups. Before the transfer to the incubator, the first group was not disinfected (negative control). In the second group, eggs were disinfected by means of formaldehyde fumigation (positive control). In the third and fourth group, reactive oxygen forms were used for disinfection— perhydrol (H2O2) and ozone (O3), respectively. Eggs were incubated under standard conditions. On the 14th D, eggs were candled, and proportions of fertilized eggs and died embryos were calculated. In addition, samples were collected for microbiological examination. After 17.5 D, the results of the whole hatching were evaluated. Chicks were reared for 14 D. Their survivability and body weight gain were recorded. Disinfection by means of reactive oxygen forms did not prove to be more effective in reducing the number of bacterial colonies on the shell. Reduced hatching and significantly increased mortality in the O3 group may indicate the negative impact of this gas on developing embryos. The results of hatching from eggs disinfected with H2O2 did not differ from those obtained in control groups. The biggest chicks were obtained from O3 disinfected eggs. However, during rearing, their growth did not match the one observed for birds in the remaining groups. Chicks hatched from eggs disinfected with H2O2 were characterized by the largest survivability. Disinfection with reactive oxygen forms did not significantly improve the hygiene of hatching eggs, hatching performance, and quality of hatched chicks. Hydrogen peroxide, whose application offered satisfactory hatching results, may be the recommended disinfectant. On the other hand, O3 appears to be undesirable because of its negative impact on bird embryos.
topic ozone
hydrogen peroxide
disinfection
hatching egg
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579120300171
work_keys_str_mv AT lukaszwlazlo useofreactiveoxygenspeciesozonehydrogenperoxidefordisinfectionofhatchingeggs
AT kamildrabik useofreactiveoxygenspeciesozonehydrogenperoxidefordisinfectionofhatchingeggs
AT karrariaalshammari useofreactiveoxygenspeciesozonehydrogenperoxidefordisinfectionofhatchingeggs
AT justynabatkowska useofreactiveoxygenspeciesozonehydrogenperoxidefordisinfectionofhatchingeggs
AT bozenanowakowiczdebek useofreactiveoxygenspeciesozonehydrogenperoxidefordisinfectionofhatchingeggs
AT magdalenagryzinska useofreactiveoxygenspeciesozonehydrogenperoxidefordisinfectionofhatchingeggs
_version_ 1724566315374477312