Deep Disagreement and the Virtues of Argumentative and Epistemic Incapacity
Fogelin’s (1985) Wittgensteinian view of deep disagreement as allowing no rational resolution has been criticized from both argumentation theoretic and epistemological perspectives. These criticisms typically do not recognize how his point applies to the very argumentative resources on which they r...
Main Author: | Jeremy Barris |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5040 |
Similar Items
-
Deep Disagreement and Patience as an Argumentative Virtue
by: Kathryn Phillips
Published: (2021-03-01) -
The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements
by: Kirk Lougheed
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Arguing, Arguments, and Deep Disagreements
by: Peter Davson-Galle
Published: (1992-01-01) -
The Epistemic Problems of Peer Disagreement
by: Tung-Ying Wu, et al.
Published: (2014) -
The Epistemic Good of Epistemic Responsibilist Virtues
by: Nastasia Müller
Published: (2021-07-01)