Deep Disagreement and the Virtues of Argumentative and Epistemic Incapacity

Fogelin’s (1985) Wittgensteinian view of deep disagreement as allowing no rational resolution has been criticized from both argumentation theoretic and epistemological perspectives. These criticisms typically do not recognize how his point applies to the very argumentative resources on which they r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jeremy Barris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2018-09-01
Series:Informal Logic
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5040

Similar Items