Socio-Political Significance of Herodotos' Hybris and Phthonos and Thucydides' Rule of Power and Tyche

Hybris (arrogance) and the states potentially caused by hybris, phthonos (zealousy or envy), and ate (disaster) or nemesis (punishment), in Herodotus frequently are attributed to Xerxes. And hybris does not refer to the monarchic domination itself, but the ambition for an excessive scale of territ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jayoung Che
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athens Institute for Education and Research 2015-01-01
Series:Athens Journal of History
Online Access:http://www.atiner.gr/journals/history/2015-1-1-5-Che.pdf
id doaj-8db3d78682cf4ee89881c6f4098d67fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8db3d78682cf4ee89881c6f4098d67fc2021-07-15T06:58:01ZengAthens Institute for Education and ResearchAthens Journal of History2407-96772015-01-0111658210.30958/ajhis.1-1-5Socio-Political Significance of Herodotos' Hybris and Phthonos and Thucydides' Rule of Power and TycheJayoung Che0Assistant Professor, Busan University of Foreign Studies, Republic of Korea Hybris (arrogance) and the states potentially caused by hybris, phthonos (zealousy or envy), and ate (disaster) or nemesis (punishment), in Herodotus frequently are attributed to Xerxes. And hybris does not refer to the monarchic domination itself, but the ambition for an excessive scale of territory. A king's conquest used to result in a temporary increase of military power, and the power of Persia was almost irresistible, many times greater than the target of its conquest. Once the conquest was completed and the king's sovereignty recognized, however, his rule pretended to follow conventional usage. And the ruled under the king were regarded as 'king's slaves,' who were dominated not necessarily under the oppression and control of standing army. Thucydides hybris, however, refers to the Athenians as a community. The target of Athenian’s conquest was not the slaves, and the military forces of the Athenian rivals were a close match for the Athenians. So the Athenian militaristic hegemony could be sustained only by superiority of military power, irrelevant to any traditional custom. In this kind of balance of power, human errors or insolence could bring about fatal disasters much more in war time than in peace, as human mistakes bear more risk in the situation of war. And, different from the Persian king’s ambition for a larger territory, the principle, 'rule of power' as a natural law, applicable even to small area, irrelevant of territorial extent. The punishment in Herodotos was inflicted by deity against the hybris committed by individuals, but in Thucydides by Tyche (Fortune) which alters situations unexpectedly and causes disaster to a community, irrelevant of whether one commits hybris or not.http://www.atiner.gr/journals/history/2015-1-1-5-Che.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jayoung Che
spellingShingle Jayoung Che
Socio-Political Significance of Herodotos' Hybris and Phthonos and Thucydides' Rule of Power and Tyche
Athens Journal of History
author_facet Jayoung Che
author_sort Jayoung Che
title Socio-Political Significance of Herodotos' Hybris and Phthonos and Thucydides' Rule of Power and Tyche
title_short Socio-Political Significance of Herodotos' Hybris and Phthonos and Thucydides' Rule of Power and Tyche
title_full Socio-Political Significance of Herodotos' Hybris and Phthonos and Thucydides' Rule of Power and Tyche
title_fullStr Socio-Political Significance of Herodotos' Hybris and Phthonos and Thucydides' Rule of Power and Tyche
title_full_unstemmed Socio-Political Significance of Herodotos' Hybris and Phthonos and Thucydides' Rule of Power and Tyche
title_sort socio-political significance of herodotos' hybris and phthonos and thucydides' rule of power and tyche
publisher Athens Institute for Education and Research
series Athens Journal of History
issn 2407-9677
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Hybris (arrogance) and the states potentially caused by hybris, phthonos (zealousy or envy), and ate (disaster) or nemesis (punishment), in Herodotus frequently are attributed to Xerxes. And hybris does not refer to the monarchic domination itself, but the ambition for an excessive scale of territory. A king's conquest used to result in a temporary increase of military power, and the power of Persia was almost irresistible, many times greater than the target of its conquest. Once the conquest was completed and the king's sovereignty recognized, however, his rule pretended to follow conventional usage. And the ruled under the king were regarded as 'king's slaves,' who were dominated not necessarily under the oppression and control of standing army. Thucydides hybris, however, refers to the Athenians as a community. The target of Athenian’s conquest was not the slaves, and the military forces of the Athenian rivals were a close match for the Athenians. So the Athenian militaristic hegemony could be sustained only by superiority of military power, irrelevant to any traditional custom. In this kind of balance of power, human errors or insolence could bring about fatal disasters much more in war time than in peace, as human mistakes bear more risk in the situation of war. And, different from the Persian king’s ambition for a larger territory, the principle, 'rule of power' as a natural law, applicable even to small area, irrelevant of territorial extent. The punishment in Herodotos was inflicted by deity against the hybris committed by individuals, but in Thucydides by Tyche (Fortune) which alters situations unexpectedly and causes disaster to a community, irrelevant of whether one commits hybris or not.
url http://www.atiner.gr/journals/history/2015-1-1-5-Che.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jayoungche sociopoliticalsignificanceofherodotoshybrisandphthonosandthucydidesruleofpowerandtyche
_version_ 1721301550759936000