The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?

In this case, the CJEU answers the question whether Article 1(3) of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant must be interpreted as meaning that when there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe Article 4 of the Charter, the executing judic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Koen Bovend'Eerdt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2016-09-01
Series:Utrecht Journal of International and European Law
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtjournal.org/articles/337
id doaj-8db20150198b42f2832afa33b4dbf72b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8db20150198b42f2832afa33b4dbf72b2020-11-24T20:52:26ZengUbiquity PressUtrecht Journal of International and European Law2053-53412016-09-01328311212110.5334/ujiel.337125The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?Koen Bovend'Eerdt0Utrecht UniversityIn this case, the CJEU answers the question whether Article 1(3) of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant must be interpreted as meaning that when there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe Article 4 of the Charter, the executing judicial authority must refuse surrender of the person against whom a European arrest warrant is issued. The CJEU rules that if, after a two-stage assessment, the executing judicial authority finds that there is a real risk of an Article 4 violation for the requested person once surrendered, the execution of the arrest warrant must initially be deferred and, where such a risk cannot be discounted, the executing judicial authority must decide whether or not to terminate the surrender procedure. This conclusion shakes the system of mutual trust upon which the principle of mutual recognition is built.http://www.utrechtjournal.org/articles/337Framework Decision 2002/584JHAGrounds for non-executionMutual recognitionMutual trustArticle 4 Charter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Koen Bovend'Eerdt
spellingShingle Koen Bovend'Eerdt
The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?
Utrecht Journal of International and European Law
Framework Decision 2002/584JHA
Grounds for non-execution
Mutual recognition
Mutual trust
Article 4 Charter
author_facet Koen Bovend'Eerdt
author_sort Koen Bovend'Eerdt
title The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?
title_short The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?
title_full The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?
title_fullStr The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?
title_full_unstemmed The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?
title_sort joined cases aranyosi and căldăraru: a new limit to the mutual trust presumption in the area of freedom, security, and justice?
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Utrecht Journal of International and European Law
issn 2053-5341
publishDate 2016-09-01
description In this case, the CJEU answers the question whether Article 1(3) of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant must be interpreted as meaning that when there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe Article 4 of the Charter, the executing judicial authority must refuse surrender of the person against whom a European arrest warrant is issued. The CJEU rules that if, after a two-stage assessment, the executing judicial authority finds that there is a real risk of an Article 4 violation for the requested person once surrendered, the execution of the arrest warrant must initially be deferred and, where such a risk cannot be discounted, the executing judicial authority must decide whether or not to terminate the surrender procedure. This conclusion shakes the system of mutual trust upon which the principle of mutual recognition is built.
topic Framework Decision 2002/584JHA
Grounds for non-execution
Mutual recognition
Mutual trust
Article 4 Charter
url http://www.utrechtjournal.org/articles/337
work_keys_str_mv AT koenbovendeerdt thejoinedcasesaranyosiandcaldararuanewlimittothemutualtrustpresumptionintheareaoffreedomsecurityandjustice
AT koenbovendeerdt joinedcasesaranyosiandcaldararuanewlimittothemutualtrustpresumptionintheareaoffreedomsecurityandjustice
_version_ 1716799648130138112