The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?
In this case, the CJEU answers the question whether Article 1(3) of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant must be interpreted as meaning that when there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe Article 4 of the Charter, the executing judic...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2016-09-01
|
Series: | Utrecht Journal of International and European Law |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.utrechtjournal.org/articles/337 |
id |
doaj-8db20150198b42f2832afa33b4dbf72b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8db20150198b42f2832afa33b4dbf72b2020-11-24T20:52:26ZengUbiquity PressUtrecht Journal of International and European Law2053-53412016-09-01328311212110.5334/ujiel.337125The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?Koen Bovend'Eerdt0Utrecht UniversityIn this case, the CJEU answers the question whether Article 1(3) of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant must be interpreted as meaning that when there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe Article 4 of the Charter, the executing judicial authority must refuse surrender of the person against whom a European arrest warrant is issued. The CJEU rules that if, after a two-stage assessment, the executing judicial authority finds that there is a real risk of an Article 4 violation for the requested person once surrendered, the execution of the arrest warrant must initially be deferred and, where such a risk cannot be discounted, the executing judicial authority must decide whether or not to terminate the surrender procedure. This conclusion shakes the system of mutual trust upon which the principle of mutual recognition is built.http://www.utrechtjournal.org/articles/337Framework Decision 2002/584JHAGrounds for non-executionMutual recognitionMutual trustArticle 4 Charter |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Koen Bovend'Eerdt |
spellingShingle |
Koen Bovend'Eerdt The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice? Utrecht Journal of International and European Law Framework Decision 2002/584JHA Grounds for non-execution Mutual recognition Mutual trust Article 4 Charter |
author_facet |
Koen Bovend'Eerdt |
author_sort |
Koen Bovend'Eerdt |
title |
The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice? |
title_short |
The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice? |
title_full |
The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice? |
title_fullStr |
The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice? |
title_sort |
joined cases aranyosi and căldăraru: a new limit to the mutual trust presumption in the area of freedom, security, and justice? |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Utrecht Journal of International and European Law |
issn |
2053-5341 |
publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
description |
In this case, the CJEU answers the question whether Article 1(3) of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant must be interpreted as meaning that when there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe Article 4 of the Charter, the executing judicial authority must refuse surrender of the person against whom a European arrest warrant is issued. The CJEU rules that if, after a two-stage assessment, the executing judicial authority finds that there is a real risk of an Article 4 violation for the requested person once surrendered, the execution of the arrest warrant must initially be deferred and, where such a risk cannot be discounted, the executing judicial authority must decide whether or not to terminate the surrender procedure. This conclusion shakes the system of mutual trust upon which the principle of mutual recognition is built. |
topic |
Framework Decision 2002/584JHA Grounds for non-execution Mutual recognition Mutual trust Article 4 Charter |
url |
http://www.utrechtjournal.org/articles/337 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT koenbovendeerdt thejoinedcasesaranyosiandcaldararuanewlimittothemutualtrustpresumptionintheareaoffreedomsecurityandjustice AT koenbovendeerdt joinedcasesaranyosiandcaldararuanewlimittothemutualtrustpresumptionintheareaoffreedomsecurityandjustice |
_version_ |
1716799648130138112 |