Developing and Demonstrating Climate Indicators for Monitoring the Changing Water Cycle

In this study, we developed a suite of spatially and temporally scalable Water Cycle Indicators (WCI) to examine the long-term changes in water cycle variability and demonstrated their use over the contiguous US (CONUS) during 1979–2013 using the MERRA reanalysis product. The WCI indicators consist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xia Feng, Paul Houser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Advances in Meteorology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5481731
id doaj-8d828b15a51f4c34868467f1f281ef1c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d828b15a51f4c34868467f1f281ef1c2020-11-24T23:06:02ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Meteorology1687-93091687-93172016-01-01201610.1155/2016/54817315481731Developing and Demonstrating Climate Indicators for Monitoring the Changing Water CycleXia Feng0Paul Houser1Department of Geography and Geoinformation Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USADepartment of Geography and Geoinformation Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USAIn this study, we developed a suite of spatially and temporally scalable Water Cycle Indicators (WCI) to examine the long-term changes in water cycle variability and demonstrated their use over the contiguous US (CONUS) during 1979–2013 using the MERRA reanalysis product. The WCI indicators consist of six water balance variables monitoring the mean conditions and extreme aspects of the changing water cycle. The variables include precipitation (P), evaporation (E), runoff (R), terrestrial water storage (dS/dt), moisture convergence flux (C), and atmospheric moisture content (dW/dt). Means are determined as the daily total value, while extremes include wet and dry extremes, defined as the upper and lower 10th percentile of daily distribution. Trends are assessed for annual and seasonal indicators at several different spatial scales. Our results indicate that significant changes have occurred in most of the indicators, and these changes are geographically and seasonally dependent. There are more upward trends than downward trends in all eighteen annual indicators averaged over the CONUS. The spatial correlations between the annual trends in means and extremes are statistically significant across the country and are stronger for P, E, R, and C compared to dS/dt and dW/dt.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5481731
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xia Feng
Paul Houser
spellingShingle Xia Feng
Paul Houser
Developing and Demonstrating Climate Indicators for Monitoring the Changing Water Cycle
Advances in Meteorology
author_facet Xia Feng
Paul Houser
author_sort Xia Feng
title Developing and Demonstrating Climate Indicators for Monitoring the Changing Water Cycle
title_short Developing and Demonstrating Climate Indicators for Monitoring the Changing Water Cycle
title_full Developing and Demonstrating Climate Indicators for Monitoring the Changing Water Cycle
title_fullStr Developing and Demonstrating Climate Indicators for Monitoring the Changing Water Cycle
title_full_unstemmed Developing and Demonstrating Climate Indicators for Monitoring the Changing Water Cycle
title_sort developing and demonstrating climate indicators for monitoring the changing water cycle
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Meteorology
issn 1687-9309
1687-9317
publishDate 2016-01-01
description In this study, we developed a suite of spatially and temporally scalable Water Cycle Indicators (WCI) to examine the long-term changes in water cycle variability and demonstrated their use over the contiguous US (CONUS) during 1979–2013 using the MERRA reanalysis product. The WCI indicators consist of six water balance variables monitoring the mean conditions and extreme aspects of the changing water cycle. The variables include precipitation (P), evaporation (E), runoff (R), terrestrial water storage (dS/dt), moisture convergence flux (C), and atmospheric moisture content (dW/dt). Means are determined as the daily total value, while extremes include wet and dry extremes, defined as the upper and lower 10th percentile of daily distribution. Trends are assessed for annual and seasonal indicators at several different spatial scales. Our results indicate that significant changes have occurred in most of the indicators, and these changes are geographically and seasonally dependent. There are more upward trends than downward trends in all eighteen annual indicators averaged over the CONUS. The spatial correlations between the annual trends in means and extremes are statistically significant across the country and are stronger for P, E, R, and C compared to dS/dt and dW/dt.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5481731
work_keys_str_mv AT xiafeng developinganddemonstratingclimateindicatorsformonitoringthechangingwatercycle
AT paulhouser developinganddemonstratingclimateindicatorsformonitoringthechangingwatercycle
_version_ 1725624158894686208