Numerical Simulations of the 1 May 2012 Deep Convection Event over Cuba: Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysical Schemes in a High-Resolution Model

This paper evaluates the sensitivity to cumulus and microphysics schemes, as represented in numerical simulations of the Weather Research and Forecasting model, in characterizing a deep convection event over the Cuban island on 1 May 2012. To this end, 30 experiments combining five cumulus and six m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yandy G. Mayor, Michel D. S. Mesquita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Advances in Meteorology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/973151
id doaj-8d8212037de4490fbc54cded17b88bf7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d8212037de4490fbc54cded17b88bf72020-11-24T22:54:25ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Meteorology1687-93091687-93172015-01-01201510.1155/2015/973151973151Numerical Simulations of the 1 May 2012 Deep Convection Event over Cuba: Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysical Schemes in a High-Resolution ModelYandy G. Mayor0Michel D. S. Mesquita1Instituto de Meteorología, Apartado 17032, 11700 La Habana, CubaUni Research Climate, The Bjerknes Center for Climate Research, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, NorwayThis paper evaluates the sensitivity to cumulus and microphysics schemes, as represented in numerical simulations of the Weather Research and Forecasting model, in characterizing a deep convection event over the Cuban island on 1 May 2012. To this end, 30 experiments combining five cumulus and six microphysics schemes, in addition to two experiments in which the cumulus parameterization was turned off, are tested in order to choose the combination that represents the event precipitation more accurately. ERA Interim is used as lateral boundary condition data for the downscaling procedure. Results show that convective schemes are more important than microphysics schemes for determining the precipitation areas within a high-resolution domain simulation. Also, while one cumulus scheme captures the overall spatial convective structure of the event more accurately than others, it fails to capture the precipitation intensity. This apparent discrepancy leads to sensitivity related to the verification method used to rank the scheme combinations. This sensitivity is also observed in a comparison between parameterized and explicit cumulus formation when the Kain-Fritsch scheme was used. A loss of added value is also found when the Grell-Freitas cumulus scheme was activated at 1 km grid spacing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/973151
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yandy G. Mayor
Michel D. S. Mesquita
spellingShingle Yandy G. Mayor
Michel D. S. Mesquita
Numerical Simulations of the 1 May 2012 Deep Convection Event over Cuba: Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysical Schemes in a High-Resolution Model
Advances in Meteorology
author_facet Yandy G. Mayor
Michel D. S. Mesquita
author_sort Yandy G. Mayor
title Numerical Simulations of the 1 May 2012 Deep Convection Event over Cuba: Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysical Schemes in a High-Resolution Model
title_short Numerical Simulations of the 1 May 2012 Deep Convection Event over Cuba: Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysical Schemes in a High-Resolution Model
title_full Numerical Simulations of the 1 May 2012 Deep Convection Event over Cuba: Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysical Schemes in a High-Resolution Model
title_fullStr Numerical Simulations of the 1 May 2012 Deep Convection Event over Cuba: Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysical Schemes in a High-Resolution Model
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Simulations of the 1 May 2012 Deep Convection Event over Cuba: Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysical Schemes in a High-Resolution Model
title_sort numerical simulations of the 1 may 2012 deep convection event over cuba: sensitivity to cumulus and microphysical schemes in a high-resolution model
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Meteorology
issn 1687-9309
1687-9317
publishDate 2015-01-01
description This paper evaluates the sensitivity to cumulus and microphysics schemes, as represented in numerical simulations of the Weather Research and Forecasting model, in characterizing a deep convection event over the Cuban island on 1 May 2012. To this end, 30 experiments combining five cumulus and six microphysics schemes, in addition to two experiments in which the cumulus parameterization was turned off, are tested in order to choose the combination that represents the event precipitation more accurately. ERA Interim is used as lateral boundary condition data for the downscaling procedure. Results show that convective schemes are more important than microphysics schemes for determining the precipitation areas within a high-resolution domain simulation. Also, while one cumulus scheme captures the overall spatial convective structure of the event more accurately than others, it fails to capture the precipitation intensity. This apparent discrepancy leads to sensitivity related to the verification method used to rank the scheme combinations. This sensitivity is also observed in a comparison between parameterized and explicit cumulus formation when the Kain-Fritsch scheme was used. A loss of added value is also found when the Grell-Freitas cumulus scheme was activated at 1 km grid spacing.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/973151
work_keys_str_mv AT yandygmayor numericalsimulationsofthe1may2012deepconvectioneventovercubasensitivitytocumulusandmicrophysicalschemesinahighresolutionmodel
AT micheldsmesquita numericalsimulationsofthe1may2012deepconvectioneventovercubasensitivitytocumulusandmicrophysicalschemesinahighresolutionmodel
_version_ 1725659959891329024