Comparison of the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimation

Objective: A new ultrasound formula for fetal weight estimation was proposed from the INTERGROWTH-21 project in 2017. There is no comparison of its accuracy with other ultrasound formulae. This study aims to compare the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula in fetal weight estimation with the tradition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Choi Wah Kong, William Wing Kee To
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-03-01
Series:Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455919300191
id doaj-8d7e4a21d5074464aecc9682374bb894
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d7e4a21d5074464aecc9682374bb8942020-11-24T22:08:22ZengElsevierTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology1028-45592019-03-01582273277Comparison of the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimationChoi Wah Kong0William Wing Kee To1Corresponding author. Department of O&G, United Christian Hospital, 130 Hip Wo Street, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong. Fax: +852 39495535; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, United Christian Hospital, Hong KongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, United Christian Hospital, Hong KongObjective: A new ultrasound formula for fetal weight estimation was proposed from the INTERGROWTH-21 project in 2017. There is no comparison of its accuracy with other ultrasound formulae. This study aims to compare the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula in fetal weight estimation with the traditional Hadlock1 and Shepard formula. Materials and methods: All pregnant patients who had delivery in United Christian Hospital between January to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Those who had prenatal ultrasound scan performed within 7 days of delivery were recruited. Hadlock1, Shepard and INTERGROWTH-21 formula were used to estimate the fetal weight and their accuracies were compared with the actual birthweight of neonates. Results: A total of 403 patients were recruited. Hadlock1 was the most accurate with the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) 7.34 when compared with Shepard (9.00; p < 0.001) and INTERGROWTH-21 (9.07; p < 0.001). INTERGROWTH-21 had the lowest proportion of patients having estimated fetal weight within 10% discrepancy from the actual birthweight (57.6%) compared with Hadlock1 (71.2%; p < 0.001) and Shepard (66.3; p = 0.011). Presence of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) or fetal macrosomia (>=4000 g) were both associated with significantly higher MAPE in Hadlock1 and INTERGROWTH-21. IUGR (p = 0.005) and macrosomia (p = 0.004) remained significant in the final equation of logistic regression model that affect the precision of fetal weight estimation in Hadlock1, while only IUGR was significant in INTERGROWTH-21 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: INTERGROWTH-21 formula was not shown to be better than the traditional Hadlock1 or Shepard formulae. Future prospective studies would be required to evaluate the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula especially at the extremes of birthweight. Keywords: Birth weight, Fetal growth retardation, Fetal macrosomia, Fetal weight, Ultrasonographyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455919300191
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Choi Wah Kong
William Wing Kee To
spellingShingle Choi Wah Kong
William Wing Kee To
Comparison of the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimation
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
author_facet Choi Wah Kong
William Wing Kee To
author_sort Choi Wah Kong
title Comparison of the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimation
title_short Comparison of the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimation
title_full Comparison of the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimation
title_fullStr Comparison of the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimation
title_sort comparison of the accuracy of intergrowth-21 formula with other ultrasound formulae in fetal weight estimation
publisher Elsevier
series Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
issn 1028-4559
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Objective: A new ultrasound formula for fetal weight estimation was proposed from the INTERGROWTH-21 project in 2017. There is no comparison of its accuracy with other ultrasound formulae. This study aims to compare the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula in fetal weight estimation with the traditional Hadlock1 and Shepard formula. Materials and methods: All pregnant patients who had delivery in United Christian Hospital between January to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Those who had prenatal ultrasound scan performed within 7 days of delivery were recruited. Hadlock1, Shepard and INTERGROWTH-21 formula were used to estimate the fetal weight and their accuracies were compared with the actual birthweight of neonates. Results: A total of 403 patients were recruited. Hadlock1 was the most accurate with the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) 7.34 when compared with Shepard (9.00; p < 0.001) and INTERGROWTH-21 (9.07; p < 0.001). INTERGROWTH-21 had the lowest proportion of patients having estimated fetal weight within 10% discrepancy from the actual birthweight (57.6%) compared with Hadlock1 (71.2%; p < 0.001) and Shepard (66.3; p = 0.011). Presence of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) or fetal macrosomia (>=4000 g) were both associated with significantly higher MAPE in Hadlock1 and INTERGROWTH-21. IUGR (p = 0.005) and macrosomia (p = 0.004) remained significant in the final equation of logistic regression model that affect the precision of fetal weight estimation in Hadlock1, while only IUGR was significant in INTERGROWTH-21 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: INTERGROWTH-21 formula was not shown to be better than the traditional Hadlock1 or Shepard formulae. Future prospective studies would be required to evaluate the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 formula especially at the extremes of birthweight. Keywords: Birth weight, Fetal growth retardation, Fetal macrosomia, Fetal weight, Ultrasonography
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455919300191
work_keys_str_mv AT choiwahkong comparisonoftheaccuracyofintergrowth21formulawithotherultrasoundformulaeinfetalweightestimation
AT williamwingkeeto comparisonoftheaccuracyofintergrowth21formulawithotherultrasoundformulaeinfetalweightestimation
_version_ 1725816362297720832