Global Names in the Russian Language: The Development of Figurative Meanings

This paper is devoted to semantic transformations of global names that have changed or developed new figurative (evaluative) meanings in the recent two decades. The title refers to onyms of various classes (toponyms, anthroponyms, names of goods and services, enterprises, movies, events, etc.), whic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Irina V. Kryukova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta 2020-07-01
Series:Voprosy Onomastiki
Subjects:
Online Access:http://onomastics.ru/en/content/2020-volume-17-issue-2-10
id doaj-8d71a9c371e84a0885805e25cce9c81e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d71a9c371e84a0885805e25cce9c81e2020-11-25T03:04:31ZrusIzdatelstvo Uralskogo UniversitetaVoprosy Onomastiki1994-24001994-24512020-07-0117224125510.15826/vopr_onom.2020.17.2.026Global Names in the Russian Language: The Development of Figurative MeaningsIrina V. Kryukova0Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical UniversityThis paper is devoted to semantic transformations of global names that have changed or developed new figurative (evaluative) meanings in the recent two decades. The title refers to onyms of various classes (toponyms, anthroponyms, names of goods and services, enterprises, movies, events, etc.), which are used worldwide. They are well-known to a wide number of native speakers involved in cross-cultural communication and frequently used in speech. This study aims to trace the semantic transformations of global names in the Russian language and culture, reflected in the media and mass literature of the post-Soviet era. A contextual analysis of 110 global names showcasing semantic transfers led the author to draw the following conclusions: 1) in certain contexts, global names can lose their onomastic status, acquire lexico-grammatical features of a precedent name and become part of metaphorical expressions; in this capacity, they turn into a tool of social assessment: considering the domestic culture on a par with another develops a “foreign” perspective in its evaluation; 2) each single global name can develop several figurative meanings with different degrees of metaphorization, graphic design, negative or positive connotations, and spheres of usage; 3) the development of figurative meanings of a multivalent global name is not a synchronic process. The two snapshot surveys (of 1998–2008 and 2009–2018) the author has undertaken show the expansion of the names’ meanings; the drift of meanings from nominative to symbolic; the development of ambivalent figurative meanings reflecting the ambiguous and changing attitude of the Russian native speakers to globalization and its consequences..http://onomastics.ru/en/content/2020-volume-17-issue-2-10global nameconnotationprecedent namecomparisonmetaphorironypolysemyevolution of connotative meanings
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Irina V. Kryukova
spellingShingle Irina V. Kryukova
Global Names in the Russian Language: The Development of Figurative Meanings
Voprosy Onomastiki
global name
connotation
precedent name
comparison
metaphor
irony
polysemy
evolution of connotative meanings
author_facet Irina V. Kryukova
author_sort Irina V. Kryukova
title Global Names in the Russian Language: The Development of Figurative Meanings
title_short Global Names in the Russian Language: The Development of Figurative Meanings
title_full Global Names in the Russian Language: The Development of Figurative Meanings
title_fullStr Global Names in the Russian Language: The Development of Figurative Meanings
title_full_unstemmed Global Names in the Russian Language: The Development of Figurative Meanings
title_sort global names in the russian language: the development of figurative meanings
publisher Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta
series Voprosy Onomastiki
issn 1994-2400
1994-2451
publishDate 2020-07-01
description This paper is devoted to semantic transformations of global names that have changed or developed new figurative (evaluative) meanings in the recent two decades. The title refers to onyms of various classes (toponyms, anthroponyms, names of goods and services, enterprises, movies, events, etc.), which are used worldwide. They are well-known to a wide number of native speakers involved in cross-cultural communication and frequently used in speech. This study aims to trace the semantic transformations of global names in the Russian language and culture, reflected in the media and mass literature of the post-Soviet era. A contextual analysis of 110 global names showcasing semantic transfers led the author to draw the following conclusions: 1) in certain contexts, global names can lose their onomastic status, acquire lexico-grammatical features of a precedent name and become part of metaphorical expressions; in this capacity, they turn into a tool of social assessment: considering the domestic culture on a par with another develops a “foreign” perspective in its evaluation; 2) each single global name can develop several figurative meanings with different degrees of metaphorization, graphic design, negative or positive connotations, and spheres of usage; 3) the development of figurative meanings of a multivalent global name is not a synchronic process. The two snapshot surveys (of 1998–2008 and 2009–2018) the author has undertaken show the expansion of the names’ meanings; the drift of meanings from nominative to symbolic; the development of ambivalent figurative meanings reflecting the ambiguous and changing attitude of the Russian native speakers to globalization and its consequences..
topic global name
connotation
precedent name
comparison
metaphor
irony
polysemy
evolution of connotative meanings
url http://onomastics.ru/en/content/2020-volume-17-issue-2-10
work_keys_str_mv AT irinavkryukova globalnamesintherussianlanguagethedevelopmentoffigurativemeanings
_version_ 1724681334039773184