Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United States

Backgrounds. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) negatively affects transplant outcomes. The current geographic distribution of CMV risk within the US has not been described. Methods. CMV serostatus of donors and recipients in each US state were collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients betw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margaret R. Jorgenson, PharmD, Sandesh Parajuli, MBBS, Nicholas Marka, PhD, Glen E. Leverson, PhD, Jeannina A. Smith, MD, Didier A. Mandelbrot, MD, Jon S. Odorico, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2021-06-01
Series:Transplantation Direct
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001147
id doaj-8d6c233b6bc34d6288b6795c156bda55
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d6c233b6bc34d6288b6795c156bda552021-06-28T03:16:19ZengWolters KluwerTransplantation Direct2373-87312021-06-0176e70410.1097/TXD.0000000000001147202106000-00009Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United StatesMargaret R. Jorgenson, PharmD0Sandesh Parajuli, MBBS1Nicholas Marka, PhD2Glen E. Leverson, PhD3Jeannina A. Smith, MD4Didier A. Mandelbrot, MD5Jon S. Odorico, MD61 Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI.2 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.3 Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.3 Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.4 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.4 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.5 Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.Backgrounds. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) negatively affects transplant outcomes. The current geographic distribution of CMV risk within the US has not been described. Methods. CMV serostatus of donors and recipients in each US state were collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2019. The objective was to describe rates of CMV recipient seropositivity (R+) and high-risk serostatus (D+/R−) across the US in kidney transplant recipient (KTR) and pancreas transplant recipient (PTR) and explore geographic disparities. Results. A total of 79 276 KTRs and 4023 PTRs were included. The average KTR R+ rate across states was 59.5% (range 39%–76%); PTR R+ rate was 49.5% but with a broader range (0%–100%). The average KTR D+/R− rate across the US was 19% (range 8.7%–25%); PTR D+/R− rate was notably higher (26.9%, range 0%–50%). KTR seropositivity varied geographically with more R+ recipients in the southern states, Alaska, and Hawaii. D+/R− KTRs also varied by region, with higher rates in the Rocky Mountain Region as well as the Midwest and the northern-most states of the Northeast. Trends found in KTR persisted in PTR. Conclusions. The distribution of CMV serostatus in the US varies by state and allograft type. These data may be useful in further discussion of national CMV donor-matching strategies.http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001147
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Margaret R. Jorgenson, PharmD
Sandesh Parajuli, MBBS
Nicholas Marka, PhD
Glen E. Leverson, PhD
Jeannina A. Smith, MD
Didier A. Mandelbrot, MD
Jon S. Odorico, MD
spellingShingle Margaret R. Jorgenson, PharmD
Sandesh Parajuli, MBBS
Nicholas Marka, PhD
Glen E. Leverson, PhD
Jeannina A. Smith, MD
Didier A. Mandelbrot, MD
Jon S. Odorico, MD
Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United States
Transplantation Direct
author_facet Margaret R. Jorgenson, PharmD
Sandesh Parajuli, MBBS
Nicholas Marka, PhD
Glen E. Leverson, PhD
Jeannina A. Smith, MD
Didier A. Mandelbrot, MD
Jon S. Odorico, MD
author_sort Margaret R. Jorgenson, PharmD
title Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United States
title_short Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United States
title_full Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United States
title_fullStr Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Geographic Distribution of Cytomegalovirus Serology in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients in the United States
title_sort geographic distribution of cytomegalovirus serology in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients in the united states
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Transplantation Direct
issn 2373-8731
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Backgrounds. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) negatively affects transplant outcomes. The current geographic distribution of CMV risk within the US has not been described. Methods. CMV serostatus of donors and recipients in each US state were collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2019. The objective was to describe rates of CMV recipient seropositivity (R+) and high-risk serostatus (D+/R−) across the US in kidney transplant recipient (KTR) and pancreas transplant recipient (PTR) and explore geographic disparities. Results. A total of 79 276 KTRs and 4023 PTRs were included. The average KTR R+ rate across states was 59.5% (range 39%–76%); PTR R+ rate was 49.5% but with a broader range (0%–100%). The average KTR D+/R− rate across the US was 19% (range 8.7%–25%); PTR D+/R− rate was notably higher (26.9%, range 0%–50%). KTR seropositivity varied geographically with more R+ recipients in the southern states, Alaska, and Hawaii. D+/R− KTRs also varied by region, with higher rates in the Rocky Mountain Region as well as the Midwest and the northern-most states of the Northeast. Trends found in KTR persisted in PTR. Conclusions. The distribution of CMV serostatus in the US varies by state and allograft type. These data may be useful in further discussion of national CMV donor-matching strategies.
url http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001147
work_keys_str_mv AT margaretrjorgensonpharmd geographicdistributionofcytomegalovirusserologyinkidneyandpancreastransplantrecipientsintheunitedstates
AT sandeshparajulimbbs geographicdistributionofcytomegalovirusserologyinkidneyandpancreastransplantrecipientsintheunitedstates
AT nicholasmarkaphd geographicdistributionofcytomegalovirusserologyinkidneyandpancreastransplantrecipientsintheunitedstates
AT gleneleversonphd geographicdistributionofcytomegalovirusserologyinkidneyandpancreastransplantrecipientsintheunitedstates
AT jeanninaasmithmd geographicdistributionofcytomegalovirusserologyinkidneyandpancreastransplantrecipientsintheunitedstates
AT didieramandelbrotmd geographicdistributionofcytomegalovirusserologyinkidneyandpancreastransplantrecipientsintheunitedstates
AT jonsodoricomd geographicdistributionofcytomegalovirusserologyinkidneyandpancreastransplantrecipientsintheunitedstates
_version_ 1721357003924701184