IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical sub...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Brasileira de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva
|
Series: | Ciência & Saúde Coletiva |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017001204001&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-8d674867a7cf4dd0a86648ece4475c3d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8d674867a7cf4dd0a86648ece4475c3d2020-11-25T00:20:54ZengAssociação Brasileira de Pós-Graduação em Saúde ColetivaCiência & Saúde Coletiva1678-456122124001401210.1590/1413-812320172212.14112016S1413-81232017001204001IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisMaria Ines RosaMaria Fernandes dos ReisCarla SimonEduardo DondossolaMaria Cecília AlexandreTamy ColonettiFernanda Oliveira MellerAbstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017001204001&lng=en&tlng=enLeptospirose humanaELISA IgMDiagnósticoMeta-análise |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maria Ines Rosa Maria Fernandes dos Reis Carla Simon Eduardo Dondossola Maria Cecília Alexandre Tamy Colonetti Fernanda Oliveira Meller |
spellingShingle |
Maria Ines Rosa Maria Fernandes dos Reis Carla Simon Eduardo Dondossola Maria Cecília Alexandre Tamy Colonetti Fernanda Oliveira Meller IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ciência & Saúde Coletiva Leptospirose humana ELISA IgM Diagnóstico Meta-análise |
author_facet |
Maria Ines Rosa Maria Fernandes dos Reis Carla Simon Eduardo Dondossola Maria Cecília Alexandre Tamy Colonetti Fernanda Oliveira Meller |
author_sort |
Maria Ines Rosa |
title |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
igm elisa for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Associação Brasileira de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva |
series |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva |
issn |
1678-4561 |
description |
Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections. |
topic |
Leptospirose humana ELISA IgM Diagnóstico Meta-análise |
url |
http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017001204001&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariainesrosa igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mariafernandesdosreis igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT carlasimon igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT eduardodondossola igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mariaceciliaalexandre igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tamycolonetti igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fernandaoliveirameller igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1725365168210182144 |