IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Ines Rosa, Maria Fernandes dos Reis, Carla Simon, Eduardo Dondossola, Maria Cecília Alexandre, Tamy Colonetti, Fernanda Oliveira Meller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva
Series:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017001204001&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-8d674867a7cf4dd0a86648ece4475c3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d674867a7cf4dd0a86648ece4475c3d2020-11-25T00:20:54ZengAssociação Brasileira de Pós-Graduação em Saúde ColetivaCiência & Saúde Coletiva1678-456122124001401210.1590/1413-812320172212.14112016S1413-81232017001204001IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisMaria Ines RosaMaria Fernandes dos ReisCarla SimonEduardo DondossolaMaria Cecília AlexandreTamy ColonettiFernanda Oliveira MellerAbstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017001204001&lng=en&tlng=enLeptospirose humanaELISA IgMDiagnósticoMeta-análise
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Ines Rosa
Maria Fernandes dos Reis
Carla Simon
Eduardo Dondossola
Maria Cecília Alexandre
Tamy Colonetti
Fernanda Oliveira Meller
spellingShingle Maria Ines Rosa
Maria Fernandes dos Reis
Carla Simon
Eduardo Dondossola
Maria Cecília Alexandre
Tamy Colonetti
Fernanda Oliveira Meller
IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
Leptospirose humana
ELISA IgM
Diagnóstico
Meta-análise
author_facet Maria Ines Rosa
Maria Fernandes dos Reis
Carla Simon
Eduardo Dondossola
Maria Cecília Alexandre
Tamy Colonetti
Fernanda Oliveira Meller
author_sort Maria Ines Rosa
title IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort igm elisa for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva
series Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
issn 1678-4561
description Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.
topic Leptospirose humana
ELISA IgM
Diagnóstico
Meta-análise
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232017001204001&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT mariainesrosa igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariafernandesdosreis igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carlasimon igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eduardodondossola igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariaceciliaalexandre igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tamycolonetti igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fernandaoliveirameller igmelisaforleptospirosisdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725365168210182144