Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture

Introduction: Although the treatment of choice for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients has been internal fixation for a long time, several studies have shown mechanical and technical failures. Primary cemented bipolar (PCB) hemiarthroplasty has been proposed as an alternative wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gashi YN, Elhadi AS, Elbushra IM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2018-03-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
DHS
Online Access:http://www.morthoj.org/2018/v12n1/primary-cemented-bipolar.pdf
id doaj-8d5dd6d718334d9d82f261575bdb8055
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d5dd6d718334d9d82f261575bdb80552021-05-02T03:47:36ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332232-111X2018-03-01121364110.5704/MOJ.1803.007Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric FractureGashi YN0 Elhadi AS1Elbushra IM2MDMDMDIntroduction: Although the treatment of choice for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients has been internal fixation for a long time, several studies have shown mechanical and technical failures. Primary cemented bipolar (PCB) hemiarthroplasty has been proposed as an alternative with some advantages concerning earlier mobilization and minimal postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cohort hospital-based study conducted at three tertiary hospitals over a period of two years. A total of 98 patients were enrolled in the study, 38 patients treated with Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and 60 patients treated with PCB hemiarthroplasty. Intraoperative events (e.g. duration of surgery and blood loss), hospital stay, weight bearing, Harris Hip score and post-operative complications were used as predictors of final outcome. Mean follow-up was 13.66±5.9 months in hemiarthroplasty group and 11.8±2.7 months at internal fixation group. Results: The two groups were comparable in age, sex, comorbidity, mode of trauma, and classification of fracture. Early mobilisation was significantly better in hemiarthroplasty (p<0.001) where 93.3% of patients started partial weight bearing on postoperative Day 1, while in the DHS group, 73.7% of patients started partial weight bearing after two weeks postoperatively. At the final follow-up, the mortality rate did not differ between the two groups, but general and mechanical complications were more common in the DHS group. The mean Harris Hip score was better in the hemiarthroplasty group (91.14 vs 74.11). Conclusion: Primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty is a safe and valid option in treating unstable intertrochanteric fracture. Although it has been shown to have some advantages over DHS in certain circumstances, lack of randomization and difficulties in standardization of patients and treating surgeon raise a need for more studies with bigger sample size and proper randomization.http://www.morthoj.org/2018/v12n1/primary-cemented-bipolar.pdfunstableintertrochanteric fracturebipolar hemiarthroplastyDHS
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gashi YN
Elhadi AS
Elbushra IM
spellingShingle Gashi YN
Elhadi AS
Elbushra IM
Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
unstable
intertrochanteric fracture
bipolar hemiarthroplasty
DHS
author_facet Gashi YN
Elhadi AS
Elbushra IM
author_sort Gashi YN
title Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture
title_short Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture
title_full Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture
title_fullStr Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture
title_sort outcome of primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty compared with dynamic hip screw in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
issn 1985-2533
2232-111X
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Introduction: Although the treatment of choice for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients has been internal fixation for a long time, several studies have shown mechanical and technical failures. Primary cemented bipolar (PCB) hemiarthroplasty has been proposed as an alternative with some advantages concerning earlier mobilization and minimal postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cohort hospital-based study conducted at three tertiary hospitals over a period of two years. A total of 98 patients were enrolled in the study, 38 patients treated with Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and 60 patients treated with PCB hemiarthroplasty. Intraoperative events (e.g. duration of surgery and blood loss), hospital stay, weight bearing, Harris Hip score and post-operative complications were used as predictors of final outcome. Mean follow-up was 13.66±5.9 months in hemiarthroplasty group and 11.8±2.7 months at internal fixation group. Results: The two groups were comparable in age, sex, comorbidity, mode of trauma, and classification of fracture. Early mobilisation was significantly better in hemiarthroplasty (p<0.001) where 93.3% of patients started partial weight bearing on postoperative Day 1, while in the DHS group, 73.7% of patients started partial weight bearing after two weeks postoperatively. At the final follow-up, the mortality rate did not differ between the two groups, but general and mechanical complications were more common in the DHS group. The mean Harris Hip score was better in the hemiarthroplasty group (91.14 vs 74.11). Conclusion: Primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty is a safe and valid option in treating unstable intertrochanteric fracture. Although it has been shown to have some advantages over DHS in certain circumstances, lack of randomization and difficulties in standardization of patients and treating surgeon raise a need for more studies with bigger sample size and proper randomization.
topic unstable
intertrochanteric fracture
bipolar hemiarthroplasty
DHS
url http://www.morthoj.org/2018/v12n1/primary-cemented-bipolar.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gashiyn outcomeofprimarycementedbipolarhemiarthroplastycomparedwithdynamichipscrewinelderlypatientswithunstableintertrochantericfracture
AT elhadias outcomeofprimarycementedbipolarhemiarthroplastycomparedwithdynamichipscrewinelderlypatientswithunstableintertrochantericfracture
AT elbushraim outcomeofprimarycementedbipolarhemiarthroplastycomparedwithdynamichipscrewinelderlypatientswithunstableintertrochantericfracture
_version_ 1721495529116925952