Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation

In his review of my recent book, Abstract Market Theory, Johnson mistakes my investigation into the conditions and limits of probabilistic reasoning as a rejection of its sense and utility. The same misunderstanding also appears in a review by Munger published recently. In both cases this leads to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jon Roffe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2016-12-01
Series:Finance and Society
Online Access:http://financeandsociety.ed.ac.uk/article/view/1735
id doaj-8d5a2bc6146e4a589478c4a3594b3ce7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d5a2bc6146e4a589478c4a3594b3ce72020-11-24T21:11:47ZengUniversity of EdinburghFinance and Society2059-59992016-12-01222172410.2218/finsoc.v2i2.17351735Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentationJon Roffe0University of New South WalesIn his review of my recent book, Abstract Market Theory, Johnson mistakes my investigation into the conditions and limits of probabilistic reasoning as a rejection of its sense and utility. The same misunderstanding also appears in a review by Munger published recently. In both cases this leads to a skewed and reductive understanding of my reconception of the relationship between price and value. In this response, I present an outline of the philosophical goals of Abstract Market Theory. My intent is not just to show that these reviews are incorrect in their presentation of my argument, but to also indicate why a philosophical perspective remains indispensable for our understanding of the market.http://financeandsociety.ed.ac.uk/article/view/1735
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jon Roffe
spellingShingle Jon Roffe
Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation
Finance and Society
author_facet Jon Roffe
author_sort Jon Roffe
title Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation
title_short Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation
title_full Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation
title_fullStr Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation
title_full_unstemmed Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation
title_sort model hagiography: a reply to johnson and munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation
publisher University of Edinburgh
series Finance and Society
issn 2059-5999
publishDate 2016-12-01
description In his review of my recent book, Abstract Market Theory, Johnson mistakes my investigation into the conditions and limits of probabilistic reasoning as a rejection of its sense and utility. The same misunderstanding also appears in a review by Munger published recently. In both cases this leads to a skewed and reductive understanding of my reconception of the relationship between price and value. In this response, I present an outline of the philosophical goals of Abstract Market Theory. My intent is not just to show that these reviews are incorrect in their presentation of my argument, but to also indicate why a philosophical perspective remains indispensable for our understanding of the market.
url http://financeandsociety.ed.ac.uk/article/view/1735
work_keys_str_mv AT jonroffe modelhagiographyareplytojohnsonandmungeronprobabilityphilosophyandtranscendentalargumentation
_version_ 1716752733531275264