Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation
Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developi...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201/full |
id |
doaj-8d57ddcc93494998ab406f55a0bc22ce |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8d57ddcc93494998ab406f55a0bc22ce2020-11-24T23:00:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-03-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0020181305Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validationLucy eFoulkes0Essi eViding1Eamon J McCrory2Craig S Neumann3University College LondonUniversity College LondonUniversity College LondonUniversity of North TexasHuman beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N=305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N=505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI=.96, RSMEA=.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201/fullconfirmatory factor analysisDark triadexploratory factor analysissocial motivationsocial rewardscale development |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lucy eFoulkes Essi eViding Eamon J McCrory Craig S Neumann |
spellingShingle |
Lucy eFoulkes Essi eViding Eamon J McCrory Craig S Neumann Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation Frontiers in Psychology confirmatory factor analysis Dark triad exploratory factor analysis social motivation social reward scale development |
author_facet |
Lucy eFoulkes Essi eViding Eamon J McCrory Craig S Neumann |
author_sort |
Lucy eFoulkes |
title |
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation |
title_short |
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation |
title_full |
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation |
title_fullStr |
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation |
title_sort |
social reward questionnaire (srq): development and validation |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2014-03-01 |
description |
Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N=305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N=505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI=.96, RSMEA=.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards. |
topic |
confirmatory factor analysis Dark triad exploratory factor analysis social motivation social reward scale development |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lucyefoulkes socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation AT essieviding socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation AT eamonjmccrory socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation AT craigsneumann socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation |
_version_ |
1725642176564559872 |