Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation

Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucy eFoulkes, Essi eViding, Eamon J McCrory, Craig S Neumann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201/full
id doaj-8d57ddcc93494998ab406f55a0bc22ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d57ddcc93494998ab406f55a0bc22ce2020-11-24T23:00:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-03-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0020181305Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validationLucy eFoulkes0Essi eViding1Eamon J McCrory2Craig S Neumann3University College LondonUniversity College LondonUniversity College LondonUniversity of North TexasHuman beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N=305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N=505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI=.96, RSMEA=.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201/fullconfirmatory factor analysisDark triadexploratory factor analysissocial motivationsocial rewardscale development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucy eFoulkes
Essi eViding
Eamon J McCrory
Craig S Neumann
spellingShingle Lucy eFoulkes
Essi eViding
Eamon J McCrory
Craig S Neumann
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation
Frontiers in Psychology
confirmatory factor analysis
Dark triad
exploratory factor analysis
social motivation
social reward
scale development
author_facet Lucy eFoulkes
Essi eViding
Eamon J McCrory
Craig S Neumann
author_sort Lucy eFoulkes
title Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation
title_short Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation
title_full Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation
title_fullStr Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation
title_full_unstemmed Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation
title_sort social reward questionnaire (srq): development and validation
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N=305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N=505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI=.96, RSMEA=.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards.
topic confirmatory factor analysis
Dark triad
exploratory factor analysis
social motivation
social reward
scale development
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lucyefoulkes socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT essieviding socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT eamonjmccrory socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT craigsneumann socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation
_version_ 1725642176564559872