Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia”

Addressing the entangled histories of deliberative decision making, political representation, and constitutionalism in several geographic and temporal contexts, this Special Issue offers nuanced political and intellectual histories and anthropologies of parliamentarism in Eurasia. It explores parlia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ivan Sablin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Eurasian Studies
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366519900992
id doaj-8d40081fddec48e29ee055686d3b901d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d40081fddec48e29ee055686d3b901d2020-11-25T04:01:41ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Eurasian Studies1879-36651879-36732020-01-011110.1177/1879366519900992Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia”Ivan SablinAddressing the entangled histories of deliberative decision making, political representation, and constitutionalism in several geographic and temporal contexts, this Special Issue offers nuanced political and intellectual histories and anthropologies of parliamentarism in Eurasia. It explores parliaments and quasi-parliamentary formations and the designs of such in the Qing and Russian Empires, the late Soviet Union, Ukraine, the Russian Far East, and the Russian-Mongolian borderlands (from Buryat and Mongolian perspectives) in seven contributions. Apart from the regional interconnections, the Special Issue foregrounds the concepts of diversity and empire to enable an interdisciplinary discussion. Understanding empires as composite spaces, where the ambivalent and situational difference is central for the governing repertoires, the articles discuss social (ethnic, religious, regional, etc.) diversity in particular contexts and the ways it affected the parliamentary designs. The multitude of the latter is understood as institutional diversity and is discussed in relation to different levels of administration, as well as the positions of respective parliamentary formations within political systems and their performance within regimes. The contributions also investigate different forms of deliberative decision-making, including the soviet, the Congress of People’s Deputies, and the national congress, which allows to include conceptual diversity of Eurasian parliamentarisms into the discussions in area and global studies. The Special Issue highlights the role of (quasi-)parliaments in dissembling and reassembling imperial formations and the ways in which parliaments were eclipsed by other institutions of power, both political and economic.https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366519900992
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ivan Sablin
spellingShingle Ivan Sablin
Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia”
Journal of Eurasian Studies
author_facet Ivan Sablin
author_sort Ivan Sablin
title Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia”
title_short Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia”
title_full Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia”
title_fullStr Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia”
title_full_unstemmed Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia”
title_sort introduction to the special issue “parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial eurasia”
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Eurasian Studies
issn 1879-3665
1879-3673
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Addressing the entangled histories of deliberative decision making, political representation, and constitutionalism in several geographic and temporal contexts, this Special Issue offers nuanced political and intellectual histories and anthropologies of parliamentarism in Eurasia. It explores parliaments and quasi-parliamentary formations and the designs of such in the Qing and Russian Empires, the late Soviet Union, Ukraine, the Russian Far East, and the Russian-Mongolian borderlands (from Buryat and Mongolian perspectives) in seven contributions. Apart from the regional interconnections, the Special Issue foregrounds the concepts of diversity and empire to enable an interdisciplinary discussion. Understanding empires as composite spaces, where the ambivalent and situational difference is central for the governing repertoires, the articles discuss social (ethnic, religious, regional, etc.) diversity in particular contexts and the ways it affected the parliamentary designs. The multitude of the latter is understood as institutional diversity and is discussed in relation to different levels of administration, as well as the positions of respective parliamentary formations within political systems and their performance within regimes. The contributions also investigate different forms of deliberative decision-making, including the soviet, the Congress of People’s Deputies, and the national congress, which allows to include conceptual diversity of Eurasian parliamentarisms into the discussions in area and global studies. The Special Issue highlights the role of (quasi-)parliaments in dissembling and reassembling imperial formations and the ways in which parliaments were eclipsed by other institutions of power, both political and economic.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1879366519900992
work_keys_str_mv AT ivansablin introductiontothespecialissueparliamentaryformationsanddiversitiesinpostimperialeurasia
_version_ 1724445738261282816