Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparison

The paper addresses the issue of the current ability of art. 28 Workers’ Statute to safeguard the constitutional rights involved in industrial relations. The analysis starts from three decisions of the Court of Florence, Milan and Bologna concerning digital platforms’ conducts that the Trade Unions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Annamaria Donini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bologna 2021-06-01
Series:Labour & Law Issues
Subjects:
Online Access:https://labourlaw.unibo.it/article/view/13180
id doaj-8d3da041715a4d8b834906aafe3f233d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d3da041715a4d8b834906aafe3f233d2021-06-29T13:41:33ZengUniversity of BolognaLabour & Law Issues2421-26952021-06-01711R.3310.6092/issn.2421-2695/1318011492Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparisonAnnamaria Donini0Università di GenovaThe paper addresses the issue of the current ability of art. 28 Workers’ Statute to safeguard the constitutional rights involved in industrial relations. The analysis starts from three decisions of the Court of Florence, Milan and Bologna concerning digital platforms’ conducts that the Trade Unions considered harmful to the freedom of association and to collective bargaining. Particular attention is also given to the legitimacy of Trade Unions to take legal action under art. 28 when the anti-union conduct affects autonomous platform workers (especially riders and shoppers).https://labourlaw.unibo.it/article/view/13180art.28 act. n. 300/1970digital platformsridersshoppersfreedom of associationcollective bargaining
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annamaria Donini
spellingShingle Annamaria Donini
Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparison
Labour & Law Issues
art.28 act. n. 300/1970
digital platforms
riders
shoppers
freedom of association
collective bargaining
author_facet Annamaria Donini
author_sort Annamaria Donini
title Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparison
title_short Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparison
title_full Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparison
title_fullStr Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparison
title_full_unstemmed Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparison
title_sort art. 28 of the workers' statute and autonomous collaborations: three decisions under comparison
publisher University of Bologna
series Labour & Law Issues
issn 2421-2695
publishDate 2021-06-01
description The paper addresses the issue of the current ability of art. 28 Workers’ Statute to safeguard the constitutional rights involved in industrial relations. The analysis starts from three decisions of the Court of Florence, Milan and Bologna concerning digital platforms’ conducts that the Trade Unions considered harmful to the freedom of association and to collective bargaining. Particular attention is also given to the legitimacy of Trade Unions to take legal action under art. 28 when the anti-union conduct affects autonomous platform workers (especially riders and shoppers).
topic art.28 act. n. 300/1970
digital platforms
riders
shoppers
freedom of association
collective bargaining
url https://labourlaw.unibo.it/article/view/13180
work_keys_str_mv AT annamariadonini art28oftheworkersstatuteandautonomouscollaborationsthreedecisionsundercomparison
_version_ 1721354850770354176