The Events and Participants of the Time of Troubles in the Russian Memorial Culture

Introduction. The study of historical memory has recently become one of the most relevant research areas. The Time of Troubles of the early 17th century is one of the most acute socio-political crises in the history of the country which has been arousing the interest of many historians. At the same...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evgeny F. Krinko, Evgeniya M. Goryushina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Volgograd State University 2019-04-01
Series:Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1922
id doaj-8d2ce113e7bb4af3a6bd3238414a8855
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d2ce113e7bb4af3a6bd3238414a88552020-11-25T01:14:47ZrusVolgograd State UniversityVestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ1998-99382312-87042019-04-0124220321410.15688/jvolsu4.2019.2.17The Events and Participants of the Time of Troubles in the Russian Memorial CultureEvgeny F. Krinko0Evgeniya M. Goryushina1Laboratory of History and Ethnography, Southern Scientific Center, RAS, Rostov-on-Don, Russian FederationSouthern Scientific Center, RAS, Rostov-on-Don, Russian FederationIntroduction. The study of historical memory has recently become one of the most relevant research areas. The Time of Troubles of the early 17th century is one of the most acute socio-political crises in the history of the country which has been arousing the interest of many historians. At the same time, the features of reflecting events and participants of the Time of Troubles in various forms of historical memory are becoming the subject of special studies. Methods and materials. The authors used the institutional approach,general scientific methods of logical analysis, the comparative historical and problem chronological methods, the situational analysis. The article is based on the authors’ field observations, historiographic sources and mass media publications. Analysis. Three periods can be distinguished in the memorialization of events and participants of the Time of Troubles: pre-revolutionary, Soviet, and post-Soviet. They are closely related to the periods in the history of the Russian and Soviet states and the policy of memory. In addition, each of them is divided into two stages. Results. In the 17th – 18th centuries, honoring events, heroes and martyrs of the Time of Troubles took religious forms. In the 19th century, the policy of memory was separated from the church and became an independent area of activity. But its dependence on the state was increasing, especially in the era of Nicholas I’s reign. This was evidenced by forming the cult of Susanin. The largest ideological campaign of imperial Russia which caused a significant increase in the number of memorial events and objects dedicated to the Time of Troubles was the celebration of the 300th anniversary of the House of Romanov. After the revolution of 1917, a program of monumental propaganda was implemented. It included overthrowing old monuments of the monarchy and establishing new ones, including ones dedicated to popular movements and their leaders, and Bolotnikov was one of them. Closing and destructing temples acquired a massive character. It involved temples dedicated to the Time of Troubles as well. But since the late 1930s, Soviet policy of memory returned to patriotic principles, which led to creating new monuments to Susanin, Minin and Pozharsky. The modern period in the Soviet policy of memory development is characterized by restoring destroyed temples and erecting new monuments to participants of the Time of Troubles, including those who were “omitted figures”. National Unity Day gave a significant impetus to creating memorial objects in honor of the events and heroes of the Time of Troubles. Monuments of regional and local significance appeared in many places. They were designed not only to “fit” the fate of a particular locality into the general history of the country, but also to make it more attractive for tourists.https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1922the Time of Troublesmemorial culturepolicy of memoryKuzma MininDmitry PozharskyIvan Susanin
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Evgeny F. Krinko
Evgeniya M. Goryushina
spellingShingle Evgeny F. Krinko
Evgeniya M. Goryushina
The Events and Participants of the Time of Troubles in the Russian Memorial Culture
Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
the Time of Troubles
memorial culture
policy of memory
Kuzma Minin
Dmitry Pozharsky
Ivan Susanin
author_facet Evgeny F. Krinko
Evgeniya M. Goryushina
author_sort Evgeny F. Krinko
title The Events and Participants of the Time of Troubles in the Russian Memorial Culture
title_short The Events and Participants of the Time of Troubles in the Russian Memorial Culture
title_full The Events and Participants of the Time of Troubles in the Russian Memorial Culture
title_fullStr The Events and Participants of the Time of Troubles in the Russian Memorial Culture
title_full_unstemmed The Events and Participants of the Time of Troubles in the Russian Memorial Culture
title_sort events and participants of the time of troubles in the russian memorial culture
publisher Volgograd State University
series Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
issn 1998-9938
2312-8704
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Introduction. The study of historical memory has recently become one of the most relevant research areas. The Time of Troubles of the early 17th century is one of the most acute socio-political crises in the history of the country which has been arousing the interest of many historians. At the same time, the features of reflecting events and participants of the Time of Troubles in various forms of historical memory are becoming the subject of special studies. Methods and materials. The authors used the institutional approach,general scientific methods of logical analysis, the comparative historical and problem chronological methods, the situational analysis. The article is based on the authors’ field observations, historiographic sources and mass media publications. Analysis. Three periods can be distinguished in the memorialization of events and participants of the Time of Troubles: pre-revolutionary, Soviet, and post-Soviet. They are closely related to the periods in the history of the Russian and Soviet states and the policy of memory. In addition, each of them is divided into two stages. Results. In the 17th – 18th centuries, honoring events, heroes and martyrs of the Time of Troubles took religious forms. In the 19th century, the policy of memory was separated from the church and became an independent area of activity. But its dependence on the state was increasing, especially in the era of Nicholas I’s reign. This was evidenced by forming the cult of Susanin. The largest ideological campaign of imperial Russia which caused a significant increase in the number of memorial events and objects dedicated to the Time of Troubles was the celebration of the 300th anniversary of the House of Romanov. After the revolution of 1917, a program of monumental propaganda was implemented. It included overthrowing old monuments of the monarchy and establishing new ones, including ones dedicated to popular movements and their leaders, and Bolotnikov was one of them. Closing and destructing temples acquired a massive character. It involved temples dedicated to the Time of Troubles as well. But since the late 1930s, Soviet policy of memory returned to patriotic principles, which led to creating new monuments to Susanin, Minin and Pozharsky. The modern period in the Soviet policy of memory development is characterized by restoring destroyed temples and erecting new monuments to participants of the Time of Troubles, including those who were “omitted figures”. National Unity Day gave a significant impetus to creating memorial objects in honor of the events and heroes of the Time of Troubles. Monuments of regional and local significance appeared in many places. They were designed not only to “fit” the fate of a particular locality into the general history of the country, but also to make it more attractive for tourists.
topic the Time of Troubles
memorial culture
policy of memory
Kuzma Minin
Dmitry Pozharsky
Ivan Susanin
url https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1922
work_keys_str_mv AT evgenyfkrinko theeventsandparticipantsofthetimeoftroublesintherussianmemorialculture
AT evgeniyamgoryushina theeventsandparticipantsofthetimeoftroublesintherussianmemorialculture
AT evgenyfkrinko eventsandparticipantsofthetimeoftroublesintherussianmemorialculture
AT evgeniyamgoryushina eventsandparticipantsofthetimeoftroublesintherussianmemorialculture
_version_ 1725156580730601472