Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review
Systematic reviews have provided some insight into the impact of interprofessional collaborative practice on patient outcomes. Despite strong interest in interprofessional collaborative practice, relatively little is known about its impact in primary care settings. This scoping literature review des...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-06-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020935899 |
id |
doaj-8d241ce5d880440789e3642ee225a5cb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8d241ce5d880440789e3642ee225a5cb2020-11-25T03:26:29ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402020-06-011010.1177/2158244020935899Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping ReviewLivia R. M. McCutcheon0Stuart T. Haines1Ruta Valaitis2Deborah A. Sturpe3Grant Russell4Ahlam A. Saleh5Kevin A. Clauson6Jeannie K. Lee7Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USAThe University of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, USAMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USAMonash University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USALipscomb University, Nashville, TN, USAThe University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USASystematic reviews have provided some insight into the impact of interprofessional collaborative practice on patient outcomes. Despite strong interest in interprofessional collaborative practice, relatively little is known about its impact in primary care settings. This scoping literature review describes the essential elements of an interprofessional primary care practice and explores what is known about its impact on patient care including clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. We completed a review of the literature examining the breadth of knowledge related to interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care settings. A search was conducted to identify studies based on predefined criteria. A total of 51 studies met the criteria. A total of 27 studies reported a significantly positive clinical outcome with the interprofessional collaborative practice model, 27 studies reported no difference, and one study reported negative outcome in mortality. A total of 15 studies reported a significantly positive humanistic outcome. There was little to no difference in economic outcomes. This study provides new insights for future research that examines the impact of interprofessional primary care practice.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020935899 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Livia R. M. McCutcheon Stuart T. Haines Ruta Valaitis Deborah A. Sturpe Grant Russell Ahlam A. Saleh Kevin A. Clauson Jeannie K. Lee |
spellingShingle |
Livia R. M. McCutcheon Stuart T. Haines Ruta Valaitis Deborah A. Sturpe Grant Russell Ahlam A. Saleh Kevin A. Clauson Jeannie K. Lee Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Livia R. M. McCutcheon Stuart T. Haines Ruta Valaitis Deborah A. Sturpe Grant Russell Ahlam A. Saleh Kevin A. Clauson Jeannie K. Lee |
author_sort |
Livia R. M. McCutcheon |
title |
Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review |
title_short |
Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review |
title_full |
Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr |
Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review |
title_sort |
impact of interprofessional primary care practice on patient outcomes: a scoping review |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Systematic reviews have provided some insight into the impact of interprofessional collaborative practice on patient outcomes. Despite strong interest in interprofessional collaborative practice, relatively little is known about its impact in primary care settings. This scoping literature review describes the essential elements of an interprofessional primary care practice and explores what is known about its impact on patient care including clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. We completed a review of the literature examining the breadth of knowledge related to interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care settings. A search was conducted to identify studies based on predefined criteria. A total of 51 studies met the criteria. A total of 27 studies reported a significantly positive clinical outcome with the interprofessional collaborative practice model, 27 studies reported no difference, and one study reported negative outcome in mortality. A total of 15 studies reported a significantly positive humanistic outcome. There was little to no difference in economic outcomes. This study provides new insights for future research that examines the impact of interprofessional primary care practice. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020935899 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liviarmmccutcheon impactofinterprofessionalprimarycarepracticeonpatientoutcomesascopingreview AT stuartthaines impactofinterprofessionalprimarycarepracticeonpatientoutcomesascopingreview AT rutavalaitis impactofinterprofessionalprimarycarepracticeonpatientoutcomesascopingreview AT deborahasturpe impactofinterprofessionalprimarycarepracticeonpatientoutcomesascopingreview AT grantrussell impactofinterprofessionalprimarycarepracticeonpatientoutcomesascopingreview AT ahlamasaleh impactofinterprofessionalprimarycarepracticeonpatientoutcomesascopingreview AT kevinaclauson impactofinterprofessionalprimarycarepracticeonpatientoutcomesascopingreview AT jeannieklee impactofinterprofessionalprimarycarepracticeonpatientoutcomesascopingreview |
_version_ |
1724592461939998720 |