Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment

This work investigated the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) and a hybrid ABR (HABR) for the treatment of municipal wastewater (MWW) under ambient conditions and compared the ability of the two systems to meet effluent discharge standards. The reactors were studied under hydraulic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Aqanaghad, Ghoamreza Mousavi, Reza Ghanbari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment 2018-06-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijhse.ir/index.php/IJHSE/article/view/324
id doaj-8d02635ff9a442c8a450d837d915e754
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d02635ff9a442c8a450d837d915e7542020-11-25T01:17:18ZengIranian Journal of Health, Safety and EnvironmentIranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment2345-32062345-55352018-06-015310271034152Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater TreatmentMohammad AqanaghadGhoamreza MousaviReza GhanbariThis work investigated the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) and a hybrid ABR (HABR) for the treatment of municipal wastewater (MWW) under ambient conditions and compared the ability of the two systems to meet effluent discharge standards. The reactors were studied under hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 48, 36, and 24 hours and effluent recycling (ER) rates of 0.25-1. The startup success was determined by the COD removal efficiency. The startup lasted for 107 days. In steady state COD removal efficiency decreased from 91.4% using a 48-hour HRT to 83.5% using a 24-hour HRT in the ABR, while the COD removal efficiencies of the HABR were 2.2% greater than those of the ABR at all HRTs. The HABR met COD and BOD5 effluent discharge standards using a 36-hour HRT, while the ABR achieved these standards only with a 48-hour HRT. Using a 36-hour HRT, the HABR total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiencies were 14.9% and 26.6%, while those of the ABR were 1.3% and 1% lower, respectively. The ABR and HABR met both the TSS and TP effluent standards using 48- and 36-hour HRTs, respectively, but neither met the TN effluent standard. ER did not have a positive effect on the total efficiency of either reactor. The HABR was found to be suitable for conventional MWW treatment, particularly in small cities and on-site treatment facilities.http://ijhse.ir/index.php/IJHSE/article/view/324Anaerobic Baffled Reactor, Municipal Wastewater Anaerobic Treatment, Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Aqanaghad
Ghoamreza Mousavi
Reza Ghanbari
spellingShingle Mohammad Aqanaghad
Ghoamreza Mousavi
Reza Ghanbari
Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment
Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment
Anaerobic Baffled Reactor, Municipal Wastewater Anaerobic Treatment, Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor
author_facet Mohammad Aqanaghad
Ghoamreza Mousavi
Reza Ghanbari
author_sort Mohammad Aqanaghad
title Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment
title_short Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment
title_full Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment
title_fullStr Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Anaerobic Baffled Reactor and Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Performances Evaluation in Municipal Wastewater Treatment
title_sort anaerobic baffled reactor and hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor performances evaluation in municipal wastewater treatment
publisher Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment
series Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment
issn 2345-3206
2345-5535
publishDate 2018-06-01
description This work investigated the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) and a hybrid ABR (HABR) for the treatment of municipal wastewater (MWW) under ambient conditions and compared the ability of the two systems to meet effluent discharge standards. The reactors were studied under hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 48, 36, and 24 hours and effluent recycling (ER) rates of 0.25-1. The startup success was determined by the COD removal efficiency. The startup lasted for 107 days. In steady state COD removal efficiency decreased from 91.4% using a 48-hour HRT to 83.5% using a 24-hour HRT in the ABR, while the COD removal efficiencies of the HABR were 2.2% greater than those of the ABR at all HRTs. The HABR met COD and BOD5 effluent discharge standards using a 36-hour HRT, while the ABR achieved these standards only with a 48-hour HRT. Using a 36-hour HRT, the HABR total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiencies were 14.9% and 26.6%, while those of the ABR were 1.3% and 1% lower, respectively. The ABR and HABR met both the TSS and TP effluent standards using 48- and 36-hour HRTs, respectively, but neither met the TN effluent standard. ER did not have a positive effect on the total efficiency of either reactor. The HABR was found to be suitable for conventional MWW treatment, particularly in small cities and on-site treatment facilities.
topic Anaerobic Baffled Reactor, Municipal Wastewater Anaerobic Treatment, Hybrid Anaerobic Baffled Reactor
url http://ijhse.ir/index.php/IJHSE/article/view/324
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadaqanaghad anaerobicbaffledreactorandhybridanaerobicbaffledreactorperformancesevaluationinmunicipalwastewatertreatment
AT ghoamrezamousavi anaerobicbaffledreactorandhybridanaerobicbaffledreactorperformancesevaluationinmunicipalwastewatertreatment
AT rezaghanbari anaerobicbaffledreactorandhybridanaerobicbaffledreactorperformancesevaluationinmunicipalwastewatertreatment
_version_ 1725146805162737664