Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands

Abstract The island species–area relationship (ISAR) describes how the number of species increases with increasing size of an island (or island‐like habitat), and is of fundamental importance in island biogeography and conservation. Here, we use a framework based on individual‐based rarefaction to i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leana D. Gooriah, Priya Davidar, Jonathan M. Chase
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-07-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6480
id doaj-8d01a793df7c449cbc16086929ede448
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d01a793df7c449cbc16086929ede4482021-04-02T12:31:39ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582020-07-0110147551755910.1002/ece3.6480Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islandsLeana D. Gooriah0Priya Davidar1Jonathan M. Chase2German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig GermanyDepartment of Ecology & Environmental Sciences Pondicherry University Pondicherry IndiaGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig GermanyAbstract The island species–area relationship (ISAR) describes how the number of species increases with increasing size of an island (or island‐like habitat), and is of fundamental importance in island biogeography and conservation. Here, we use a framework based on individual‐based rarefaction to infer whether ISARs result from passive sampling, or whether some processes are acting beyond sampling (e.g., disproportionate effects and/or habitat heterogeneity). Using data on total and relative abundances of four taxa (birds, butterflies, amphibians, and reptiles) from multiple islands in the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago, we examine how different metrics of biodiversity (total species richness, rarefied species richness, and abundance‐weighted effective numbers of species emphasizing common species) vary with island area. Total species richness increased for all taxa, as did rarefied species richness controlling for a given sampling effort. This indicates that the ISAR did not result because of passive sampling, but that instead, some species were disproportionately favored on larger islands. For birds, frogs, and lizards, this disproportionate effect was only associated with species that were rarer in the samples, but for butterflies, both more common and rarer species were affected. Furthermore, for the two taxa for which we had plot‐level data (reptiles and amphibians), within‐island β‐diversity did not increase with island size, suggesting that within‐island compositional effects were unlikely to be driving these ISARs. Overall, our results indicate that the ISARs of these taxa are most likely driven by disproportionate effects, that is, where larger islands are important sources of biodiversity beyond a simple sampling expectation, especially through their influence on rarer species, thus emphasizing their role in the preservation and conservation of species.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6480alpha diversitybeta diversitydisproportionate effectsgamma diversityheterogeneityindividual‐based rarefaction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leana D. Gooriah
Priya Davidar
Jonathan M. Chase
spellingShingle Leana D. Gooriah
Priya Davidar
Jonathan M. Chase
Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands
Ecology and Evolution
alpha diversity
beta diversity
disproportionate effects
gamma diversity
heterogeneity
individual‐based rarefaction
author_facet Leana D. Gooriah
Priya Davidar
Jonathan M. Chase
author_sort Leana D. Gooriah
title Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands
title_short Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands
title_full Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands
title_fullStr Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands
title_full_unstemmed Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands
title_sort species–area relationships in the andaman and nicobar islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract The island species–area relationship (ISAR) describes how the number of species increases with increasing size of an island (or island‐like habitat), and is of fundamental importance in island biogeography and conservation. Here, we use a framework based on individual‐based rarefaction to infer whether ISARs result from passive sampling, or whether some processes are acting beyond sampling (e.g., disproportionate effects and/or habitat heterogeneity). Using data on total and relative abundances of four taxa (birds, butterflies, amphibians, and reptiles) from multiple islands in the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago, we examine how different metrics of biodiversity (total species richness, rarefied species richness, and abundance‐weighted effective numbers of species emphasizing common species) vary with island area. Total species richness increased for all taxa, as did rarefied species richness controlling for a given sampling effort. This indicates that the ISAR did not result because of passive sampling, but that instead, some species were disproportionately favored on larger islands. For birds, frogs, and lizards, this disproportionate effect was only associated with species that were rarer in the samples, but for butterflies, both more common and rarer species were affected. Furthermore, for the two taxa for which we had plot‐level data (reptiles and amphibians), within‐island β‐diversity did not increase with island size, suggesting that within‐island compositional effects were unlikely to be driving these ISARs. Overall, our results indicate that the ISARs of these taxa are most likely driven by disproportionate effects, that is, where larger islands are important sources of biodiversity beyond a simple sampling expectation, especially through their influence on rarer species, thus emphasizing their role in the preservation and conservation of species.
topic alpha diversity
beta diversity
disproportionate effects
gamma diversity
heterogeneity
individual‐based rarefaction
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6480
work_keys_str_mv AT leanadgooriah speciesarearelationshipsintheandamanandnicobarislandsemergebecauserarerspeciesaredisproportionatelyfavoredonlargerislands
AT priyadavidar speciesarearelationshipsintheandamanandnicobarislandsemergebecauserarerspeciesaredisproportionatelyfavoredonlargerislands
AT jonathanmchase speciesarearelationshipsintheandamanandnicobarislandsemergebecauserarerspeciesaredisproportionatelyfavoredonlargerislands
_version_ 1721568616148631552