Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands
Abstract The island species–area relationship (ISAR) describes how the number of species increases with increasing size of an island (or island‐like habitat), and is of fundamental importance in island biogeography and conservation. Here, we use a framework based on individual‐based rarefaction to i...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6480 |
id |
doaj-8d01a793df7c449cbc16086929ede448 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8d01a793df7c449cbc16086929ede4482021-04-02T12:31:39ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582020-07-0110147551755910.1002/ece3.6480Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islandsLeana D. Gooriah0Priya Davidar1Jonathan M. Chase2German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig GermanyDepartment of Ecology & Environmental Sciences Pondicherry University Pondicherry IndiaGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig GermanyAbstract The island species–area relationship (ISAR) describes how the number of species increases with increasing size of an island (or island‐like habitat), and is of fundamental importance in island biogeography and conservation. Here, we use a framework based on individual‐based rarefaction to infer whether ISARs result from passive sampling, or whether some processes are acting beyond sampling (e.g., disproportionate effects and/or habitat heterogeneity). Using data on total and relative abundances of four taxa (birds, butterflies, amphibians, and reptiles) from multiple islands in the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago, we examine how different metrics of biodiversity (total species richness, rarefied species richness, and abundance‐weighted effective numbers of species emphasizing common species) vary with island area. Total species richness increased for all taxa, as did rarefied species richness controlling for a given sampling effort. This indicates that the ISAR did not result because of passive sampling, but that instead, some species were disproportionately favored on larger islands. For birds, frogs, and lizards, this disproportionate effect was only associated with species that were rarer in the samples, but for butterflies, both more common and rarer species were affected. Furthermore, for the two taxa for which we had plot‐level data (reptiles and amphibians), within‐island β‐diversity did not increase with island size, suggesting that within‐island compositional effects were unlikely to be driving these ISARs. Overall, our results indicate that the ISARs of these taxa are most likely driven by disproportionate effects, that is, where larger islands are important sources of biodiversity beyond a simple sampling expectation, especially through their influence on rarer species, thus emphasizing their role in the preservation and conservation of species.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6480alpha diversitybeta diversitydisproportionate effectsgamma diversityheterogeneityindividual‐based rarefaction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Leana D. Gooriah Priya Davidar Jonathan M. Chase |
spellingShingle |
Leana D. Gooriah Priya Davidar Jonathan M. Chase Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands Ecology and Evolution alpha diversity beta diversity disproportionate effects gamma diversity heterogeneity individual‐based rarefaction |
author_facet |
Leana D. Gooriah Priya Davidar Jonathan M. Chase |
author_sort |
Leana D. Gooriah |
title |
Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands |
title_short |
Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands |
title_full |
Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands |
title_fullStr |
Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands |
title_full_unstemmed |
Species–area relationships in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands |
title_sort |
species–area relationships in the andaman and nicobar islands emerge because rarer species are disproportionately favored on larger islands |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Ecology and Evolution |
issn |
2045-7758 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Abstract The island species–area relationship (ISAR) describes how the number of species increases with increasing size of an island (or island‐like habitat), and is of fundamental importance in island biogeography and conservation. Here, we use a framework based on individual‐based rarefaction to infer whether ISARs result from passive sampling, or whether some processes are acting beyond sampling (e.g., disproportionate effects and/or habitat heterogeneity). Using data on total and relative abundances of four taxa (birds, butterflies, amphibians, and reptiles) from multiple islands in the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago, we examine how different metrics of biodiversity (total species richness, rarefied species richness, and abundance‐weighted effective numbers of species emphasizing common species) vary with island area. Total species richness increased for all taxa, as did rarefied species richness controlling for a given sampling effort. This indicates that the ISAR did not result because of passive sampling, but that instead, some species were disproportionately favored on larger islands. For birds, frogs, and lizards, this disproportionate effect was only associated with species that were rarer in the samples, but for butterflies, both more common and rarer species were affected. Furthermore, for the two taxa for which we had plot‐level data (reptiles and amphibians), within‐island β‐diversity did not increase with island size, suggesting that within‐island compositional effects were unlikely to be driving these ISARs. Overall, our results indicate that the ISARs of these taxa are most likely driven by disproportionate effects, that is, where larger islands are important sources of biodiversity beyond a simple sampling expectation, especially through their influence on rarer species, thus emphasizing their role in the preservation and conservation of species. |
topic |
alpha diversity beta diversity disproportionate effects gamma diversity heterogeneity individual‐based rarefaction |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6480 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leanadgooriah speciesarearelationshipsintheandamanandnicobarislandsemergebecauserarerspeciesaredisproportionatelyfavoredonlargerislands AT priyadavidar speciesarearelationshipsintheandamanandnicobarislandsemergebecauserarerspeciesaredisproportionatelyfavoredonlargerislands AT jonathanmchase speciesarearelationshipsintheandamanandnicobarislandsemergebecauserarerspeciesaredisproportionatelyfavoredonlargerislands |
_version_ |
1721568616148631552 |