Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia

Background: Interventions targeting cognition in people with schizophrenia have shown moderate effects on improving functioning. Recent cognitive remediation (CR) approaches have begun to target metacognition to improve functioning outcomes. This study aims to develop a novel measure of metacognitio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matteo Cella, Clementine Edwards, Sarah Swan, Kay Elliot, Clare Reeder, Til Wykes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808719826846
id doaj-8cf5aea6f01c42eb80cfe722c035651c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8cf5aea6f01c42eb80cfe722c035651c2020-11-25T03:38:39ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Experimental Psychopathology2043-80872019-03-011010.1177/2043808719826846Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophreniaMatteo CellaClementine EdwardsSarah SwanKay ElliotClare ReederTil WykesBackground: Interventions targeting cognition in people with schizophrenia have shown moderate effects on improving functioning. Recent cognitive remediation (CR) approaches have begun to target metacognition to improve functioning outcomes. This study aims to develop a novel measure of metacognition and assess whether metacognitive-based CR (mCR) can improve metacognition. Method: We use data from a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing mCR plus treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone in people with schizophrenia. Participants were assessed with measures of cognition, functioning, and a new measure of metacognition at three time points: Week 0 (baseline), Week 12, and Week 24. Results: The evaluation of the novel metacognition assessment suggests that it is a reliable and valid measure. The measure positively correlates with cognitive measures, in particular with executive function and IQ but also with a measure of functioning. We found that a course of mCR was able to increase metacognition compared to TAU by Week 24. Conclusions: Metacognition may be an important mechanism to explain how CR affects functioning outcomes in people with psychosis. The systematic assessment of metacognition as part of CR studies may help to evaluate more clearly its role and relevance to functioning.https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808719826846
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matteo Cella
Clementine Edwards
Sarah Swan
Kay Elliot
Clare Reeder
Til Wykes
spellingShingle Matteo Cella
Clementine Edwards
Sarah Swan
Kay Elliot
Clare Reeder
Til Wykes
Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
author_facet Matteo Cella
Clementine Edwards
Sarah Swan
Kay Elliot
Clare Reeder
Til Wykes
author_sort Matteo Cella
title Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia
title_short Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia
title_full Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia
title_fullStr Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia
title_sort exploring the effects of cognitive remediation on metacognition in people with schizophrenia
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
issn 2043-8087
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Background: Interventions targeting cognition in people with schizophrenia have shown moderate effects on improving functioning. Recent cognitive remediation (CR) approaches have begun to target metacognition to improve functioning outcomes. This study aims to develop a novel measure of metacognition and assess whether metacognitive-based CR (mCR) can improve metacognition. Method: We use data from a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing mCR plus treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU alone in people with schizophrenia. Participants were assessed with measures of cognition, functioning, and a new measure of metacognition at three time points: Week 0 (baseline), Week 12, and Week 24. Results: The evaluation of the novel metacognition assessment suggests that it is a reliable and valid measure. The measure positively correlates with cognitive measures, in particular with executive function and IQ but also with a measure of functioning. We found that a course of mCR was able to increase metacognition compared to TAU by Week 24. Conclusions: Metacognition may be an important mechanism to explain how CR affects functioning outcomes in people with psychosis. The systematic assessment of metacognition as part of CR studies may help to evaluate more clearly its role and relevance to functioning.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808719826846
work_keys_str_mv AT matteocella exploringtheeffectsofcognitiveremediationonmetacognitioninpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT clementineedwards exploringtheeffectsofcognitiveremediationonmetacognitioninpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT sarahswan exploringtheeffectsofcognitiveremediationonmetacognitioninpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT kayelliot exploringtheeffectsofcognitiveremediationonmetacognitioninpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT clarereeder exploringtheeffectsofcognitiveremediationonmetacognitioninpeoplewithschizophrenia
AT tilwykes exploringtheeffectsofcognitiveremediationonmetacognitioninpeoplewithschizophrenia
_version_ 1724541282258255872