Does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?

Species richness and composition of current vegetation may reflect historical land use. We develop and examine the hypothesis that regional distribution and richness of fleshy-fruited woody plants, a group sharing life-form and dispersal system, reflect historical land use in open or semi-open habit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matilda Arnell, Sara A O Cousins, Ove Eriksson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225791
id doaj-8cf2c2f8e9484b3aa8b5364b8037fa43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8cf2c2f8e9484b3aa8b5364b8037fa432021-03-03T21:16:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011412e022579110.1371/journal.pone.0225791Does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?Matilda ArnellSara A O CousinsOve ErikssonSpecies richness and composition of current vegetation may reflect historical land use. We develop and examine the hypothesis that regional distribution and richness of fleshy-fruited woody plants, a group sharing life-form and dispersal system, reflect historical land use in open or semi-open habitats. Historical land use was based on maps from around the year 1900 for two regions in Sweden, and field data was gathered from surveys made in these regions. Species richness was positively related to historical land use indicated as open habitat in 1900. In one of the regions, five out of nine examined species were positively related to historical land use (with historical effect R2 ranging between 0.03 and 0.22). In the other region, we found a weaker positive relationship with historical land use in two out of nine examined species (R2 0.01 and 0.02). We conclude that current occurrence and richness of fleshy-fruited woody species is partly a legacy of historical land use, and that regions may vary in this respect. Based on a comparison between the two regions examined here, we discuss some potential causes behind this variation.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225791
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matilda Arnell
Sara A O Cousins
Ove Eriksson
spellingShingle Matilda Arnell
Sara A O Cousins
Ove Eriksson
Does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Matilda Arnell
Sara A O Cousins
Ove Eriksson
author_sort Matilda Arnell
title Does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?
title_short Does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?
title_full Does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?
title_fullStr Does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?
title_full_unstemmed Does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?
title_sort does historical land use affect the regional distribution of fleshy-fruited woody plants?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Species richness and composition of current vegetation may reflect historical land use. We develop and examine the hypothesis that regional distribution and richness of fleshy-fruited woody plants, a group sharing life-form and dispersal system, reflect historical land use in open or semi-open habitats. Historical land use was based on maps from around the year 1900 for two regions in Sweden, and field data was gathered from surveys made in these regions. Species richness was positively related to historical land use indicated as open habitat in 1900. In one of the regions, five out of nine examined species were positively related to historical land use (with historical effect R2 ranging between 0.03 and 0.22). In the other region, we found a weaker positive relationship with historical land use in two out of nine examined species (R2 0.01 and 0.02). We conclude that current occurrence and richness of fleshy-fruited woody species is partly a legacy of historical land use, and that regions may vary in this respect. Based on a comparison between the two regions examined here, we discuss some potential causes behind this variation.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225791
work_keys_str_mv AT matildaarnell doeshistoricallanduseaffecttheregionaldistributionoffleshyfruitedwoodyplants
AT saraaocousins doeshistoricallanduseaffecttheregionaldistributionoffleshyfruitedwoodyplants
AT oveeriksson doeshistoricallanduseaffecttheregionaldistributionoffleshyfruitedwoodyplants
_version_ 1714817842097946624