Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors

Missing Not at Random (MNAR) data present challenges for the social sciences, especially when combined with Missing Completely at Random (MCAR) data for dichotomous test items. Missing data on a Grade 8 Science test for one school out of seven could not be excluded as the MNAR data were required for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Celeste Combrinck, Vanessa Scherman, David Maree, Sarah Howie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-02-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018757584
id doaj-8ceb612d9d43488fa29a9a939a00f4bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ceb612d9d43488fa29a9a939a00f4bf2020-11-25T03:38:40ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402018-02-01810.1177/2158244018757584Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as PredictorsCeleste Combrinck0Vanessa Scherman1David Maree2Sarah Howie3University of Pretoria, South AfricaUniversity of South Africa, Pretoria, South AfricaUniversity of Pretoria, South AfricaUniversity of Pretoria, South AfricaMissing Not at Random (MNAR) data present challenges for the social sciences, especially when combined with Missing Completely at Random (MCAR) data for dichotomous test items. Missing data on a Grade 8 Science test for one school out of seven could not be excluded as the MNAR data were required for tracking learning progression onto the next grade. Multiple imputation (MI) was identified as a solution, and the missingness patterns were modeled with IBM Amos applying recursive structural equation modeling (SEM) for 358 cases. Rasch person measures were utilized as predictors. The final imputations were done in SPSS with logistic regression MI. Diagnostic checks of the imputations showed that the structure of the data had been maintained, and that differences between MNAR and non-MNAR missing data had been accounted for in the imputation process.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018757584
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Celeste Combrinck
Vanessa Scherman
David Maree
Sarah Howie
spellingShingle Celeste Combrinck
Vanessa Scherman
David Maree
Sarah Howie
Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors
SAGE Open
author_facet Celeste Combrinck
Vanessa Scherman
David Maree
Sarah Howie
author_sort Celeste Combrinck
title Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors
title_short Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors
title_full Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors
title_fullStr Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Imputation for Dichotomous MNAR Items Using Recursive Structural Equation Modeling With Rasch Measures as Predictors
title_sort multiple imputation for dichotomous mnar items using recursive structural equation modeling with rasch measures as predictors
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Missing Not at Random (MNAR) data present challenges for the social sciences, especially when combined with Missing Completely at Random (MCAR) data for dichotomous test items. Missing data on a Grade 8 Science test for one school out of seven could not be excluded as the MNAR data were required for tracking learning progression onto the next grade. Multiple imputation (MI) was identified as a solution, and the missingness patterns were modeled with IBM Amos applying recursive structural equation modeling (SEM) for 358 cases. Rasch person measures were utilized as predictors. The final imputations were done in SPSS with logistic regression MI. Diagnostic checks of the imputations showed that the structure of the data had been maintained, and that differences between MNAR and non-MNAR missing data had been accounted for in the imputation process.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018757584
work_keys_str_mv AT celestecombrinck multipleimputationfordichotomousmnaritemsusingrecursivestructuralequationmodelingwithraschmeasuresaspredictors
AT vanessascherman multipleimputationfordichotomousmnaritemsusingrecursivestructuralequationmodelingwithraschmeasuresaspredictors
AT davidmaree multipleimputationfordichotomousmnaritemsusingrecursivestructuralequationmodelingwithraschmeasuresaspredictors
AT sarahhowie multipleimputationfordichotomousmnaritemsusingrecursivestructuralequationmodelingwithraschmeasuresaspredictors
_version_ 1724541205070479360