Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice

This commentary reflects on my experience of compiling the Value of Sport Monitor—an on-line resource of policy-relevant, research on the social impacts of sport—for eight years. The commentary critically evaluates the assumption of the Value of Sport Monitor that social science research in sport is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fred Coalter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2017-06-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/852
id doaj-8cda3953677f4e9eb4bc0bfe2bef3c3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8cda3953677f4e9eb4bc0bfe2bef3c3a2020-11-25T02:25:07ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032017-06-015214114910.17645/si.v5i2.852513Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and PracticeFred Coalter0Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, UK, and Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BelgiumThis commentary reflects on my experience of compiling the Value of Sport Monitor—an on-line resource of policy-relevant, research on the social impacts of sport—for eight years. The commentary critically evaluates the assumption of the Value of Sport Monitor that social science research in sport is cumulative and it explores sports interest groups’ varying attitudes to the nature of evidence. It illustrates that widespread conceptual and methodological inconsistencies and weaknesses in research greatly reduce the ability to identify best practice and ‘best buys’ as a basis for policy. The commentary concludes by proposing that a way forward for research to contribute to policy and practice is via theory-based evaluation.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/852evidence-based policymethodological weaknesses, sports researchtheory-based evaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fred Coalter
spellingShingle Fred Coalter
Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice
Social Inclusion
evidence-based policy
methodological weaknesses, sports research
theory-based evaluation
author_facet Fred Coalter
author_sort Fred Coalter
title Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice
title_short Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice
title_full Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice
title_fullStr Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice
title_full_unstemmed Sport and Social Inclusion: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice
title_sort sport and social inclusion: evidence-based policy and practice
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2017-06-01
description This commentary reflects on my experience of compiling the Value of Sport Monitor—an on-line resource of policy-relevant, research on the social impacts of sport—for eight years. The commentary critically evaluates the assumption of the Value of Sport Monitor that social science research in sport is cumulative and it explores sports interest groups’ varying attitudes to the nature of evidence. It illustrates that widespread conceptual and methodological inconsistencies and weaknesses in research greatly reduce the ability to identify best practice and ‘best buys’ as a basis for policy. The commentary concludes by proposing that a way forward for research to contribute to policy and practice is via theory-based evaluation.
topic evidence-based policy
methodological weaknesses, sports research
theory-based evaluation
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/852
work_keys_str_mv AT fredcoalter sportandsocialinclusionevidencebasedpolicyandpractice
_version_ 1724852624849633280