Phenotyping as disciplinary practice: Data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in California

The narrative of the digital phenotype as a transformative vector in healthcare is nearly identical to the concept of “data drivenness” in other fields such as law enforcement. We examine the role of a prescription drug monitoring program in California—a computerized law enforcement surveillance pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mustafa I Hussain, Geoffrey C Bowker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-08-01
Series:Big Data & Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211031258
id doaj-8ccf7e73647c4cbb8cbe1a6a5cb1b8db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ccf7e73647c4cbb8cbe1a6a5cb1b8db2021-08-16T21:33:26ZengSAGE PublishingBig Data & Society2053-95172021-08-01810.1177/20539517211031258Phenotyping as disciplinary practice: Data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in CaliforniaMustafa I HussainGeoffrey C BowkerThe narrative of the digital phenotype as a transformative vector in healthcare is nearly identical to the concept of “data drivenness” in other fields such as law enforcement. We examine the role of a prescription drug monitoring program in California—a computerized law enforcement surveillance program enabled by a landmark Supreme Court case that upheld “broad police powers”—in the interprofessional conflict between physicians and law enforcement over the jurisdiction of drug use. We bring together interview passages, clinical artifacts, and academic and gray literature to investigate the power relations between police, physicians, and patients to show that prescribing data appear to the physician as evidence of problematic patient behavior by the patients, and to law enforcement as evidence of physician misconduct. In turn, physicians have adopted a disciplinary approach to patients, using quasi-legalistic documents to litigate patient behavior. We conclude that police powers have been used to pave data infrastructure through a contested jurisdiction, and law enforcement have used that infrastructure to enroll physicians into the work of disciplining patients.https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211031258
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mustafa I Hussain
Geoffrey C Bowker
spellingShingle Mustafa I Hussain
Geoffrey C Bowker
Phenotyping as disciplinary practice: Data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in California
Big Data & Society
author_facet Mustafa I Hussain
Geoffrey C Bowker
author_sort Mustafa I Hussain
title Phenotyping as disciplinary practice: Data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in California
title_short Phenotyping as disciplinary practice: Data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in California
title_full Phenotyping as disciplinary practice: Data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in California
title_fullStr Phenotyping as disciplinary practice: Data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in California
title_full_unstemmed Phenotyping as disciplinary practice: Data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in California
title_sort phenotyping as disciplinary practice: data infrastructure and the interprofessional conflict over drug use in california
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Big Data & Society
issn 2053-9517
publishDate 2021-08-01
description The narrative of the digital phenotype as a transformative vector in healthcare is nearly identical to the concept of “data drivenness” in other fields such as law enforcement. We examine the role of a prescription drug monitoring program in California—a computerized law enforcement surveillance program enabled by a landmark Supreme Court case that upheld “broad police powers”—in the interprofessional conflict between physicians and law enforcement over the jurisdiction of drug use. We bring together interview passages, clinical artifacts, and academic and gray literature to investigate the power relations between police, physicians, and patients to show that prescribing data appear to the physician as evidence of problematic patient behavior by the patients, and to law enforcement as evidence of physician misconduct. In turn, physicians have adopted a disciplinary approach to patients, using quasi-legalistic documents to litigate patient behavior. We conclude that police powers have been used to pave data infrastructure through a contested jurisdiction, and law enforcement have used that infrastructure to enroll physicians into the work of disciplining patients.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211031258
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafaihussain phenotypingasdisciplinarypracticedatainfrastructureandtheinterprofessionalconflictoverdruguseincalifornia
AT geoffreycbowker phenotypingasdisciplinarypracticedatainfrastructureandtheinterprofessionalconflictoverdruguseincalifornia
_version_ 1721205689908461568