Revisited analysis of a SHIVA01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcome
It still remains to be demonstrated that using molecular profiling to guide therapy improves patient outcome in oncology. Classification of somatic variants is not straightforward, rendering treatment decisions based on variants with unknown significance (VUS) hard to implement. The oncogenic activi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Molecular Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12180 |
id |
doaj-8ccbc3a7f951415ab3e910883c870dbd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8ccbc3a7f951415ab3e910883c870dbd2020-11-25T03:54:59ZengWileyMolecular Oncology1574-78911878-02612018-05-0112559460110.1002/1878-0261.12180Revisited analysis of a SHIVA01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcomeMaud Kamal0Gabi Tarcic1Sylvain Dureau2Oded Edelheit3Zohar Barbash4Charlotte Lecerf5Claire Morel6Benjamin Miron7Celine Callens8Nicolas Servant9Ivan Bieche10Michael Vidne11Christophe Le Tourneau12Department of Drug Development and Innovation Institut Curie Paris & Saint‐Cloud FranceNovellusDx Jerusalem IsraelDepartment of Biostatistics Institut Curie Paris FranceNovellusDx Jerusalem IsraelNovellusDx Jerusalem IsraelDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation Institut Curie Paris & Saint‐Cloud FranceDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation Institut Curie Paris & Saint‐Cloud FranceNovellusDx Jerusalem IsraelDepartment of genetics Institut Curie Paris FranceInstitut Curie/INSERM U900 Saint‐Cloud FranceDepartment of genetics Institut Curie Paris FranceNovellusDx Jerusalem IsraelDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation Institut Curie Paris & Saint‐Cloud FranceIt still remains to be demonstrated that using molecular profiling to guide therapy improves patient outcome in oncology. Classification of somatic variants is not straightforward, rendering treatment decisions based on variants with unknown significance (VUS) hard to implement. The oncogenic activity of VUS and mutations identified in 12 patients treated with molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) in the frame of SHIVA01 trial was assessed using Functional Annotation for Cancer Treatment (FACT). MTA response prediction was measured in vitro, blinded to the actual clinical trial results, and survival predictions according to FACT were correlated with the actual PFS of SHIVA01 patients. Patients with positive prediction had a median PFS of 5.8 months versus 1.7 months in patients with negative prediction (P < 0.05). Our results highlight the role of the functional interpretation of molecular profiles to predict MTA response.https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12180drug responsein vitro functional assaymutationoncogenic activityvariant with unknown significance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maud Kamal Gabi Tarcic Sylvain Dureau Oded Edelheit Zohar Barbash Charlotte Lecerf Claire Morel Benjamin Miron Celine Callens Nicolas Servant Ivan Bieche Michael Vidne Christophe Le Tourneau |
spellingShingle |
Maud Kamal Gabi Tarcic Sylvain Dureau Oded Edelheit Zohar Barbash Charlotte Lecerf Claire Morel Benjamin Miron Celine Callens Nicolas Servant Ivan Bieche Michael Vidne Christophe Le Tourneau Revisited analysis of a SHIVA01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcome Molecular Oncology drug response in vitro functional assay mutation oncogenic activity variant with unknown significance |
author_facet |
Maud Kamal Gabi Tarcic Sylvain Dureau Oded Edelheit Zohar Barbash Charlotte Lecerf Claire Morel Benjamin Miron Celine Callens Nicolas Servant Ivan Bieche Michael Vidne Christophe Le Tourneau |
author_sort |
Maud Kamal |
title |
Revisited analysis of a SHIVA01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcome |
title_short |
Revisited analysis of a SHIVA01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcome |
title_full |
Revisited analysis of a SHIVA01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcome |
title_fullStr |
Revisited analysis of a SHIVA01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcome |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisited analysis of a SHIVA01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcome |
title_sort |
revisited analysis of a shiva01 trial cohort using functional mutational analyses successfully predicted treatment outcome |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Molecular Oncology |
issn |
1574-7891 1878-0261 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
It still remains to be demonstrated that using molecular profiling to guide therapy improves patient outcome in oncology. Classification of somatic variants is not straightforward, rendering treatment decisions based on variants with unknown significance (VUS) hard to implement. The oncogenic activity of VUS and mutations identified in 12 patients treated with molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) in the frame of SHIVA01 trial was assessed using Functional Annotation for Cancer Treatment (FACT). MTA response prediction was measured in vitro, blinded to the actual clinical trial results, and survival predictions according to FACT were correlated with the actual PFS of SHIVA01 patients. Patients with positive prediction had a median PFS of 5.8 months versus 1.7 months in patients with negative prediction (P < 0.05). Our results highlight the role of the functional interpretation of molecular profiles to predict MTA response. |
topic |
drug response in vitro functional assay mutation oncogenic activity variant with unknown significance |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12180 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maudkamal revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT gabitarcic revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT sylvaindureau revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT odededelheit revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT zoharbarbash revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT charlottelecerf revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT clairemorel revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT benjaminmiron revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT celinecallens revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT nicolasservant revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT ivanbieche revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT michaelvidne revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome AT christopheletourneau revisitedanalysisofashiva01trialcohortusingfunctionalmutationalanalysessuccessfullypredictedtreatmentoutcome |
_version_ |
1724471343063236608 |