Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States
The negotiation of trade in services in the context of a free trade agreement is particularly challenging for developing countries in view of the diverse nature of the services sector, the broad regulation applicable to the supply of services, the different modes of supply and the different approach...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2016-12-01
|
Series: | British Journal of American Legal Studies |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/bjals-2016-0013 |
id |
doaj-8ccb42888d7b4b069eaff8380eef7cd7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8ccb42888d7b4b069eaff8380eef7cd72021-09-05T20:42:28ZengSciendoBritish Journal of American Legal Studies2049-40922016-12-015237139410.1515/bjals-2016-0013bjals-2016-0013Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United StatesMonardes V RodrigoThe negotiation of trade in services in the context of a free trade agreement is particularly challenging for developing countries in view of the diverse nature of the services sector, the broad regulation applicable to the supply of services, the different modes of supply and the different approaches available for the adoption of the rules governing bilateral trade in services. Two main approaches are available for these negotiations, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) model or positive list approach, and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) model or negative list approach. Even though these two models are similar with respect to the substantive obligations covering the conditions for supplying services, they differ significantly with respect to the manner and the structure of commitments.https://doi.org/10.1515/bjals-2016-0013 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Monardes V Rodrigo |
spellingShingle |
Monardes V Rodrigo Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States British Journal of American Legal Studies |
author_facet |
Monardes V Rodrigo |
author_sort |
Monardes V Rodrigo |
title |
Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States |
title_short |
Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States |
title_full |
Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States |
title_fullStr |
Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States |
title_full_unstemmed |
Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States |
title_sort |
challenges for countries in trade in services’ negotiations with the nafta approach: the experience of chile in the free trade agreement with the united states |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
British Journal of American Legal Studies |
issn |
2049-4092 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
The negotiation of trade in services in the context of a free trade agreement is particularly challenging for developing countries in view of the diverse nature of the services sector, the broad regulation applicable to the supply of services, the different modes of supply and the different approaches available for the adoption of the rules governing bilateral trade in services. Two main approaches are available for these negotiations, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) model or positive list approach, and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) model or negative list approach. Even though these two models are similar with respect to the substantive obligations covering the conditions for supplying services, they differ significantly with respect to the manner and the structure of commitments. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/bjals-2016-0013 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT monardesvrodrigo challengesforcountriesintradeinservicesnegotiationswiththenaftaapproachtheexperienceofchileinthefreetradeagreementwiththeunitedstates |
_version_ |
1717785622208315392 |