Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States

The negotiation of trade in services in the context of a free trade agreement is particularly challenging for developing countries in view of the diverse nature of the services sector, the broad regulation applicable to the supply of services, the different modes of supply and the different approach...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Monardes V Rodrigo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-12-01
Series:British Journal of American Legal Studies
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/bjals-2016-0013
id doaj-8ccb42888d7b4b069eaff8380eef7cd7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ccb42888d7b4b069eaff8380eef7cd72021-09-05T20:42:28ZengSciendoBritish Journal of American Legal Studies2049-40922016-12-015237139410.1515/bjals-2016-0013bjals-2016-0013Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United StatesMonardes V RodrigoThe negotiation of trade in services in the context of a free trade agreement is particularly challenging for developing countries in view of the diverse nature of the services sector, the broad regulation applicable to the supply of services, the different modes of supply and the different approaches available for the adoption of the rules governing bilateral trade in services. Two main approaches are available for these negotiations, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) model or positive list approach, and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) model or negative list approach. Even though these two models are similar with respect to the substantive obligations covering the conditions for supplying services, they differ significantly with respect to the manner and the structure of commitments.https://doi.org/10.1515/bjals-2016-0013
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monardes V Rodrigo
spellingShingle Monardes V Rodrigo
Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States
British Journal of American Legal Studies
author_facet Monardes V Rodrigo
author_sort Monardes V Rodrigo
title Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States
title_short Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States
title_full Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States
title_fullStr Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States
title_full_unstemmed Challenges For Countries In Trade In Services’ Negotiations With The Nafta Approach: The Experience Of Chile In The Free Trade Agreement With The United States
title_sort challenges for countries in trade in services’ negotiations with the nafta approach: the experience of chile in the free trade agreement with the united states
publisher Sciendo
series British Journal of American Legal Studies
issn 2049-4092
publishDate 2016-12-01
description The negotiation of trade in services in the context of a free trade agreement is particularly challenging for developing countries in view of the diverse nature of the services sector, the broad regulation applicable to the supply of services, the different modes of supply and the different approaches available for the adoption of the rules governing bilateral trade in services. Two main approaches are available for these negotiations, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) model or positive list approach, and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) model or negative list approach. Even though these two models are similar with respect to the substantive obligations covering the conditions for supplying services, they differ significantly with respect to the manner and the structure of commitments.
url https://doi.org/10.1515/bjals-2016-0013
work_keys_str_mv AT monardesvrodrigo challengesforcountriesintradeinservicesnegotiationswiththenaftaapproachtheexperienceofchileinthefreetradeagreementwiththeunitedstates
_version_ 1717785622208315392