Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analyses

Abstract Background The aim of this article is to give more insight into what ethical challenges clinicians in mental healthcare experience and discuss with a Clinical Ethics Committee in psychiatry in the Region of Southern Denmark. Ethical considerations are an important part of the daily decision...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Bruun, S. G. Lystbaek, E. Stenager, L. Huniche, R. Pedersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-018-0308-z
id doaj-8cc9a2ffd4034dde8f68a484ac0c1029
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8cc9a2ffd4034dde8f68a484ac0c10292020-11-25T01:22:55ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392018-06-0119111310.1186/s12910-018-0308-zEthical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analysesH. Bruun0S. G. Lystbaek1E. Stenager2L. Huniche3R. Pedersen4Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern DenmarkPsychiatric hospitals, the Region of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern DenmarkUser Perspectives, Department of Public Health, University of Southern DenmarkCenter for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of OsloAbstract Background The aim of this article is to give more insight into what ethical challenges clinicians in mental healthcare experience and discuss with a Clinical Ethics Committee in psychiatry in the Region of Southern Denmark. Ethical considerations are an important part of the daily decision-making processes and thereby for the quality of care in mental healthcare. However, such ethical challenges have been given little systematic attention – both in research and in practices. Methods A qualitative content analysis of 55 written case-reports from the Clinical Ethics Committee. The Committee offers clinicians in mental healthcare structured ethical analyses of ethical challenges and makes a thorough written case-report. Results The ethical challenges are grouped into three overarching topics: 1. Clinicians and their relation to patients and relatives. 2. Clinicians and institutional aspects of mental healthcare 3. Clinicians and mental healthcare in a wider social context. Through presentation of illustrative examples the complexity of daily clinical life in mental healthcare becomes evident, as well as typical interests, values and arguments. Conclusions This qualitative study indicates that difficult ethical challenges are an inherent part of mental healthcare that requires time, space and competence to be dealt with adequately.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-018-0308-zClinical ethics committeeMental healthcareEthical challengesHealth-care professionalsQualitative content analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. Bruun
S. G. Lystbaek
E. Stenager
L. Huniche
R. Pedersen
spellingShingle H. Bruun
S. G. Lystbaek
E. Stenager
L. Huniche
R. Pedersen
Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analyses
BMC Medical Ethics
Clinical ethics committee
Mental healthcare
Ethical challenges
Health-care professionals
Qualitative content analysis
author_facet H. Bruun
S. G. Lystbaek
E. Stenager
L. Huniche
R. Pedersen
author_sort H. Bruun
title Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analyses
title_short Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analyses
title_full Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analyses
title_fullStr Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analyses
title_full_unstemmed Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analyses
title_sort ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics committee of psychiatry in the region of southern denmark in 2010–2015: a qualitative content analyses
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background The aim of this article is to give more insight into what ethical challenges clinicians in mental healthcare experience and discuss with a Clinical Ethics Committee in psychiatry in the Region of Southern Denmark. Ethical considerations are an important part of the daily decision-making processes and thereby for the quality of care in mental healthcare. However, such ethical challenges have been given little systematic attention – both in research and in practices. Methods A qualitative content analysis of 55 written case-reports from the Clinical Ethics Committee. The Committee offers clinicians in mental healthcare structured ethical analyses of ethical challenges and makes a thorough written case-report. Results The ethical challenges are grouped into three overarching topics: 1. Clinicians and their relation to patients and relatives. 2. Clinicians and institutional aspects of mental healthcare 3. Clinicians and mental healthcare in a wider social context. Through presentation of illustrative examples the complexity of daily clinical life in mental healthcare becomes evident, as well as typical interests, values and arguments. Conclusions This qualitative study indicates that difficult ethical challenges are an inherent part of mental healthcare that requires time, space and competence to be dealt with adequately.
topic Clinical ethics committee
Mental healthcare
Ethical challenges
Health-care professionals
Qualitative content analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-018-0308-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hbruun ethicalchallengesassessedintheclinicalethicscommitteeofpsychiatryintheregionofsoutherndenmarkin20102015aqualitativecontentanalyses
AT sglystbaek ethicalchallengesassessedintheclinicalethicscommitteeofpsychiatryintheregionofsoutherndenmarkin20102015aqualitativecontentanalyses
AT estenager ethicalchallengesassessedintheclinicalethicscommitteeofpsychiatryintheregionofsoutherndenmarkin20102015aqualitativecontentanalyses
AT lhuniche ethicalchallengesassessedintheclinicalethicscommitteeofpsychiatryintheregionofsoutherndenmarkin20102015aqualitativecontentanalyses
AT rpedersen ethicalchallengesassessedintheclinicalethicscommitteeofpsychiatryintheregionofsoutherndenmarkin20102015aqualitativecontentanalyses
_version_ 1725124650535485440