Assessing Turbulence Models on the Simulation of Launch Vehicle Base Heating

Launch vehicles suffer from severe base heating during ascents. To predict launch vehicle base heat flux, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools are widely used. The selection of the turbulence model determines the numerical simulation results of launch vehicle base heating, which may instruct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pengyu Pu, Yi Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4240980
id doaj-8cb0cb887fda497a8c4b83c7a6bebcd8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8cb0cb887fda497a8c4b83c7a6bebcd82020-11-25T02:34:05ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering1687-59661687-59742019-01-01201910.1155/2019/42409804240980Assessing Turbulence Models on the Simulation of Launch Vehicle Base HeatingPengyu Pu0Yi Jiang1School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, Beijing 100081, ChinaSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, Beijing 100081, ChinaLaunch vehicles suffer from severe base heating during ascents. To predict launch vehicle base heat flux, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools are widely used. The selection of the turbulence model determines the numerical simulation results of launch vehicle base heating, which may instruct the thermal protection design for the launch vehicle base. To assess performances, several Reynolds-averaged turbulence models have been investigated for the base heating simulation based on a four-nozzle launch vehicle model. The finite-rate chemistry model was used for afterburning. The results showed that all the turbulence models have provided nearly identical mean flow properties at the nozzle exit. Menter’s baseline (BSL) and shear stress transport (SST) models have estimated the highest collision pressure and have best predicted base heat flux compared to the experiment. The Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model and the renormalization group (RNG) model have performed best in temperature estimation, respectively, in around r/rb=0~0.2 and r/rb=0.6~1. The realizable k‐ε (RKE) model has underestimated the reverse flow and failed to correctly reflect the recirculation in the base region, thus poorly predicted base heating. Among all the investigated turbulence models, the BSL and SST models are more suitable for launch vehicle base heating simulation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4240980
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pengyu Pu
Yi Jiang
spellingShingle Pengyu Pu
Yi Jiang
Assessing Turbulence Models on the Simulation of Launch Vehicle Base Heating
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
author_facet Pengyu Pu
Yi Jiang
author_sort Pengyu Pu
title Assessing Turbulence Models on the Simulation of Launch Vehicle Base Heating
title_short Assessing Turbulence Models on the Simulation of Launch Vehicle Base Heating
title_full Assessing Turbulence Models on the Simulation of Launch Vehicle Base Heating
title_fullStr Assessing Turbulence Models on the Simulation of Launch Vehicle Base Heating
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Turbulence Models on the Simulation of Launch Vehicle Base Heating
title_sort assessing turbulence models on the simulation of launch vehicle base heating
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
issn 1687-5966
1687-5974
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Launch vehicles suffer from severe base heating during ascents. To predict launch vehicle base heat flux, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools are widely used. The selection of the turbulence model determines the numerical simulation results of launch vehicle base heating, which may instruct the thermal protection design for the launch vehicle base. To assess performances, several Reynolds-averaged turbulence models have been investigated for the base heating simulation based on a four-nozzle launch vehicle model. The finite-rate chemistry model was used for afterburning. The results showed that all the turbulence models have provided nearly identical mean flow properties at the nozzle exit. Menter’s baseline (BSL) and shear stress transport (SST) models have estimated the highest collision pressure and have best predicted base heat flux compared to the experiment. The Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model and the renormalization group (RNG) model have performed best in temperature estimation, respectively, in around r/rb=0~0.2 and r/rb=0.6~1. The realizable k‐ε (RKE) model has underestimated the reverse flow and failed to correctly reflect the recirculation in the base region, thus poorly predicted base heating. Among all the investigated turbulence models, the BSL and SST models are more suitable for launch vehicle base heating simulation.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4240980
work_keys_str_mv AT pengyupu assessingturbulencemodelsonthesimulationoflaunchvehiclebaseheating
AT yijiang assessingturbulencemodelsonthesimulationoflaunchvehiclebaseheating
_version_ 1724810285511868416