Gene expression variation between mouse inbred strains

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In this study, we investigated the effect of genetic background on expression profiles. We analysed the transcriptome of mouse hindlimb muscle of five frequently used mouse inbred strains using spotted oligonucleotide microarrays.<...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boer Judith M, de Meijer Emile J, de Menezes Renée X, Sterrenburg Ellen, 't Hoen Peter AC, Turk Rolf, van Ommen Gert-Jan B, den Dunnen Johan T
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-08-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/5/57
id doaj-8c9e0609e7884baabbf1dd481a4828e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c9e0609e7884baabbf1dd481a4828e82020-11-24T22:12:50ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642004-08-01515710.1186/1471-2164-5-57Gene expression variation between mouse inbred strainsBoer Judith Mde Meijer Emile Jde Menezes Renée XSterrenburg Ellen't Hoen Peter ACTurk Rolfvan Ommen Gert-Jan Bden Dunnen Johan T<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In this study, we investigated the effect of genetic background on expression profiles. We analysed the transcriptome of mouse hindlimb muscle of five frequently used mouse inbred strains using spotted oligonucleotide microarrays.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Through ANOVA analysis with a false discovery rate of 10%, we show that 1.4% of the analysed genes is significantly differentially expressed between these mouse strains. Differential expression of several of these genes has been confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. The number of genes affected by genetic background is approximately ten-fold lower than the number of differentially expressed genes caused by a dystrophic genetic defect.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We conclude that evaluation of the effect of background on gene expression profiles in the tissue under study is an effective and sensible approach when comparing expression patterns in animal models with heterogeneous genetic backgrounds. Genes affected by the genetic background can be excluded in subsequent analyses of the disease-related changes in expression profiles. This is often a more effective strategy than backcrossing and inbreeding to obtain isogenic backgrounds.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/5/57
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Boer Judith M
de Meijer Emile J
de Menezes Renée X
Sterrenburg Ellen
't Hoen Peter AC
Turk Rolf
van Ommen Gert-Jan B
den Dunnen Johan T
spellingShingle Boer Judith M
de Meijer Emile J
de Menezes Renée X
Sterrenburg Ellen
't Hoen Peter AC
Turk Rolf
van Ommen Gert-Jan B
den Dunnen Johan T
Gene expression variation between mouse inbred strains
BMC Genomics
author_facet Boer Judith M
de Meijer Emile J
de Menezes Renée X
Sterrenburg Ellen
't Hoen Peter AC
Turk Rolf
van Ommen Gert-Jan B
den Dunnen Johan T
author_sort Boer Judith M
title Gene expression variation between mouse inbred strains
title_short Gene expression variation between mouse inbred strains
title_full Gene expression variation between mouse inbred strains
title_fullStr Gene expression variation between mouse inbred strains
title_full_unstemmed Gene expression variation between mouse inbred strains
title_sort gene expression variation between mouse inbred strains
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2004-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In this study, we investigated the effect of genetic background on expression profiles. We analysed the transcriptome of mouse hindlimb muscle of five frequently used mouse inbred strains using spotted oligonucleotide microarrays.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Through ANOVA analysis with a false discovery rate of 10%, we show that 1.4% of the analysed genes is significantly differentially expressed between these mouse strains. Differential expression of several of these genes has been confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. The number of genes affected by genetic background is approximately ten-fold lower than the number of differentially expressed genes caused by a dystrophic genetic defect.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We conclude that evaluation of the effect of background on gene expression profiles in the tissue under study is an effective and sensible approach when comparing expression patterns in animal models with heterogeneous genetic backgrounds. Genes affected by the genetic background can be excluded in subsequent analyses of the disease-related changes in expression profiles. This is often a more effective strategy than backcrossing and inbreeding to obtain isogenic backgrounds.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/5/57
work_keys_str_mv AT boerjudithm geneexpressionvariationbetweenmouseinbredstrains
AT demeijeremilej geneexpressionvariationbetweenmouseinbredstrains
AT demenezesreneex geneexpressionvariationbetweenmouseinbredstrains
AT sterrenburgellen geneexpressionvariationbetweenmouseinbredstrains
AT thoenpeterac geneexpressionvariationbetweenmouseinbredstrains
AT turkrolf geneexpressionvariationbetweenmouseinbredstrains
AT vanommengertjanb geneexpressionvariationbetweenmouseinbredstrains
AT dendunnenjohant geneexpressionvariationbetweenmouseinbredstrains
_version_ 1725802236151332864