Stanley Cavell and Film: Scepticism and Self-Reliance at the Cinema, by Catherine Wheatley

Stanley Cavell and Film is Catherine Wheatley’s entry in Bloomsbury’s “Film Thinks”, a series dedicated to explorations of cinema’s influence on thinkers such as Noël Carroll, Roland Barthes and Georges Didi-Huberman. Wheatley offers a thorough evaluation of Cavell’s canonical place in the history o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Glen W. Norton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University College Cork 2021-01-01
Series:Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue20/HTML/ReviewNorton.html
id doaj-8c9b33b1560b4276b4b6695493cd9560
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c9b33b1560b4276b4b6695493cd95602021-04-07T09:16:33ZengUniversity College CorkAlphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media2009-40782021-01-0120237242https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.20.19Stanley Cavell and Film: Scepticism and Self-Reliance at the Cinema, by Catherine WheatleyGlen W. NortonStanley Cavell and Film is Catherine Wheatley’s entry in Bloomsbury’s “Film Thinks”, a series dedicated to explorations of cinema’s influence on thinkers such as Noël Carroll, Roland Barthes and Georges Didi-Huberman. Wheatley offers a thorough evaluation of Cavell’s canonical place in the history of Film Studies, and in doing so charts the tortuous trajectory of how Film Studies in turn has critically understood and misunderstood his work. Fortified by the idea that film is central to all of Cavell’s thought, Wheatley takes a chronological approach, with each chapter charting the evolution of main Cavellian concepts/principles (the promise of ordinary language philosophy; problems of everyday scepticism and acknowledgement; the reconceptualisation of moral perfectionism) by delving into works in which they receive their fullest consideration. The ultimate aim is to reveal the full depth behind Cavell’s longstanding claim that, rather than treating film as an immutable object, his work is an “accounting for his own experience of movies”, which in turn requires “taking responsibility for his responses” (14). http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue20/HTML/ReviewNorton.htmlstanley cavellfilmscepticismperfectionism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Glen W. Norton
spellingShingle Glen W. Norton
Stanley Cavell and Film: Scepticism and Self-Reliance at the Cinema, by Catherine Wheatley
Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media
stanley cavell
film
scepticism
perfectionism
author_facet Glen W. Norton
author_sort Glen W. Norton
title Stanley Cavell and Film: Scepticism and Self-Reliance at the Cinema, by Catherine Wheatley
title_short Stanley Cavell and Film: Scepticism and Self-Reliance at the Cinema, by Catherine Wheatley
title_full Stanley Cavell and Film: Scepticism and Self-Reliance at the Cinema, by Catherine Wheatley
title_fullStr Stanley Cavell and Film: Scepticism and Self-Reliance at the Cinema, by Catherine Wheatley
title_full_unstemmed Stanley Cavell and Film: Scepticism and Self-Reliance at the Cinema, by Catherine Wheatley
title_sort stanley cavell and film: scepticism and self-reliance at the cinema, by catherine wheatley
publisher University College Cork
series Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media
issn 2009-4078
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Stanley Cavell and Film is Catherine Wheatley’s entry in Bloomsbury’s “Film Thinks”, a series dedicated to explorations of cinema’s influence on thinkers such as Noël Carroll, Roland Barthes and Georges Didi-Huberman. Wheatley offers a thorough evaluation of Cavell’s canonical place in the history of Film Studies, and in doing so charts the tortuous trajectory of how Film Studies in turn has critically understood and misunderstood his work. Fortified by the idea that film is central to all of Cavell’s thought, Wheatley takes a chronological approach, with each chapter charting the evolution of main Cavellian concepts/principles (the promise of ordinary language philosophy; problems of everyday scepticism and acknowledgement; the reconceptualisation of moral perfectionism) by delving into works in which they receive their fullest consideration. The ultimate aim is to reveal the full depth behind Cavell’s longstanding claim that, rather than treating film as an immutable object, his work is an “accounting for his own experience of movies”, which in turn requires “taking responsibility for his responses” (14).
topic stanley cavell
film
scepticism
perfectionism
url http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue20/HTML/ReviewNorton.html
work_keys_str_mv AT glenwnorton stanleycavellandfilmscepticismandselfrelianceatthecinemabycatherinewheatley
_version_ 1721536090737737728