Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.
<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800 |
id |
doaj-8c8e334c41f1441cbf3f6dba4b2a8ba2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8c8e334c41f1441cbf3f6dba4b2a8ba22021-07-29T04:32:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01162e024580010.1371/journal.pone.0245800Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.Fabricia Teixeira BarbosaLuiz Carlos Silveira ZanattaEdélcio de Souza RendohlSergio Alexandre Gehrke<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for a one-piece implant (group G1), a narrow diameter of 3.0 mm for a one-piece implant (group G2) and a narrow diameter of 3.5 mm for a two-piece implant with a Morse taper connection (group G3). A three-dimensional model was designed with cortical and cancellous bone, a crown and an implant/abutment set of each group. Axial and angled (30°) loads of 150 N was applied. The equivalent von Mises stress was used for the implants and peri-implant bone plus the Mohr-Coulomb analysis to confirm the data of the peri-implant bone.<h4>Results</h4>In the axial load, the maximum stress value of the cortical bone for the group G1 was 22.35% higher than that the group G2 and 321.23% than the group G3. Whereas in angled load, the groups G1 and G2 showing a similar value (# 3.5%) and a highest difference for the group G3 (391.8%). In the implant structure, the group G1 showed a value of 2188MPa, 93.6% higher than the limit.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The results of this study show that the extra-narrow one-piece implant should be used with great caution, especially in areas of non-axial loads, whereas the one- and two-piece narrow-diameter implants show adequate behavior in both directions of the applied load.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta Edélcio de Souza Rendohl Sergio Alexandre Gehrke |
spellingShingle |
Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta Edélcio de Souza Rendohl Sergio Alexandre Gehrke Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta Edélcio de Souza Rendohl Sergio Alexandre Gehrke |
author_sort |
Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa |
title |
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study. |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study. |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study. |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study. |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: a finite element study. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for a one-piece implant (group G1), a narrow diameter of 3.0 mm for a one-piece implant (group G2) and a narrow diameter of 3.5 mm for a two-piece implant with a Morse taper connection (group G3). A three-dimensional model was designed with cortical and cancellous bone, a crown and an implant/abutment set of each group. Axial and angled (30°) loads of 150 N was applied. The equivalent von Mises stress was used for the implants and peri-implant bone plus the Mohr-Coulomb analysis to confirm the data of the peri-implant bone.<h4>Results</h4>In the axial load, the maximum stress value of the cortical bone for the group G1 was 22.35% higher than that the group G2 and 321.23% than the group G3. Whereas in angled load, the groups G1 and G2 showing a similar value (# 3.5%) and a highest difference for the group G3 (391.8%). In the implant structure, the group G1 showed a value of 2188MPa, 93.6% higher than the limit.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The results of this study show that the extra-narrow one-piece implant should be used with great caution, especially in areas of non-axial loads, whereas the one- and two-piece narrow-diameter implants show adequate behavior in both directions of the applied load. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fabriciateixeirabarbosa comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy AT luizcarlossilveirazanatta comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy AT edelciodesouzarendohl comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy AT sergioalexandregehrke comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy |
_version_ |
1721259423933923328 |