Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.

<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa, Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta, Edélcio de Souza Rendohl, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800
id doaj-8c8e334c41f1441cbf3f6dba4b2a8ba2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c8e334c41f1441cbf3f6dba4b2a8ba22021-07-29T04:32:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01162e024580010.1371/journal.pone.0245800Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.Fabricia Teixeira BarbosaLuiz Carlos Silveira ZanattaEdélcio de Souza RendohlSergio Alexandre Gehrke<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for a one-piece implant (group G1), a narrow diameter of 3.0 mm for a one-piece implant (group G2) and a narrow diameter of 3.5 mm for a two-piece implant with a Morse taper connection (group G3). A three-dimensional model was designed with cortical and cancellous bone, a crown and an implant/abutment set of each group. Axial and angled (30°) loads of 150 N was applied. The equivalent von Mises stress was used for the implants and peri-implant bone plus the Mohr-Coulomb analysis to confirm the data of the peri-implant bone.<h4>Results</h4>In the axial load, the maximum stress value of the cortical bone for the group G1 was 22.35% higher than that the group G2 and 321.23% than the group G3. Whereas in angled load, the groups G1 and G2 showing a similar value (# 3.5%) and a highest difference for the group G3 (391.8%). In the implant structure, the group G1 showed a value of 2188MPa, 93.6% higher than the limit.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The results of this study show that the extra-narrow one-piece implant should be used with great caution, especially in areas of non-axial loads, whereas the one- and two-piece narrow-diameter implants show adequate behavior in both directions of the applied load.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa
Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta
Edélcio de Souza Rendohl
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
spellingShingle Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa
Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta
Edélcio de Souza Rendohl
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa
Luiz Carlos Silveira Zanatta
Edélcio de Souza Rendohl
Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
author_sort Fabricia Teixeira Barbosa
title Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.
title_short Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.
title_full Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.
title_sort comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: a finite element study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the stress distribution on three implant models with narrow and extra-narrow diameters using the finite element method (FEA).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Dental implants of extra-narrow diameter of 2.5 mm for a one-piece implant (group G1), a narrow diameter of 3.0 mm for a one-piece implant (group G2) and a narrow diameter of 3.5 mm for a two-piece implant with a Morse taper connection (group G3). A three-dimensional model was designed with cortical and cancellous bone, a crown and an implant/abutment set of each group. Axial and angled (30°) loads of 150 N was applied. The equivalent von Mises stress was used for the implants and peri-implant bone plus the Mohr-Coulomb analysis to confirm the data of the peri-implant bone.<h4>Results</h4>In the axial load, the maximum stress value of the cortical bone for the group G1 was 22.35% higher than that the group G2 and 321.23% than the group G3. Whereas in angled load, the groups G1 and G2 showing a similar value (# 3.5%) and a highest difference for the group G3 (391.8%). In the implant structure, the group G1 showed a value of 2188MPa, 93.6% higher than the limit.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The results of this study show that the extra-narrow one-piece implant should be used with great caution, especially in areas of non-axial loads, whereas the one- and two-piece narrow-diameter implants show adequate behavior in both directions of the applied load.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245800
work_keys_str_mv AT fabriciateixeirabarbosa comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy
AT luizcarlossilveirazanatta comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy
AT edelciodesouzarendohl comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy
AT sergioalexandregehrke comparativeanalysisofstressdistributioninonepieceandtwopieceimplantswithnarrowandextranarrowdiametersafiniteelementstudy
_version_ 1721259423933923328