Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material

Aims: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatment on shear bond strength (SBS) of a hard chairsidereline material to denture base resin. Materials and methods: Cylindric columns of denture reline materialwere bonded to columns of denture base resin. Fifty specimens were prepared and divide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radhwan H Hasan
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry 2009-08-01
Series:Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9110_647195c2f7e5143a90973701ed43f5e0.html
id doaj-8c72ab8374584b6fb94a8e6e1b2f354b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c72ab8374584b6fb94a8e6e1b2f354b2020-11-25T02:26:59ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal 1812-12171998-03452009-08-019220321010.33899/rden.2009.9110Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base MaterialRadhwan H HasanAims: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatment on shear bond strength (SBS) of a hard chairsidereline material to denture base resin. Materials and methods: Cylindric columns of denture reline materialwere bonded to columns of denture base resin. Fifty specimens were prepared and divided into 5 groupsaccording to the surface treatment used. Group I: Untreated; group II: Wetting with denture base resin monomer(180 s); group III: Wetting with Kooliner monomer (180 s); group IV: Wetting with acetone (10 s);and group V: Wetting with chloroform (5 s). The strength at which the bond failed under shear was recordedand fracture site on the specimens was tested by visual examination and reflecting light microscope. Thedata were statistically analyzed using one–way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Duncan’s Multiple RangeTest and Chi–square test. Results: All surface treatments caused significantly increase (p < 0.0001) in SBS.Chloroform caused significantly higher SBS, and untreated group showed significantly lower SBS. Mixedfailure mode was predominant in groups with higher SBS, while adhesive failure mode was predominant ingroups with lower SBS. Conclusions: All surface treatments (Monomer, Kooliner monomer, acetone, chloroform)achieved significantly higher SBS.https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9110_647195c2f7e5143a90973701ed43f5e0.htmlshear strengthreline resindenture base resinbond strength
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Radhwan H Hasan
spellingShingle Radhwan H Hasan
Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material
Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
shear strength
reline resin
denture base resin
bond strength
author_facet Radhwan H Hasan
author_sort Radhwan H Hasan
title Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material
title_short Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material
title_full Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material
title_fullStr Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material
title_full_unstemmed Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material
title_sort shear bond strength of hard chairside reline material to denture base material
publisher University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
series Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
issn 1812-1217
1998-0345
publishDate 2009-08-01
description Aims: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatment on shear bond strength (SBS) of a hard chairsidereline material to denture base resin. Materials and methods: Cylindric columns of denture reline materialwere bonded to columns of denture base resin. Fifty specimens were prepared and divided into 5 groupsaccording to the surface treatment used. Group I: Untreated; group II: Wetting with denture base resin monomer(180 s); group III: Wetting with Kooliner monomer (180 s); group IV: Wetting with acetone (10 s);and group V: Wetting with chloroform (5 s). The strength at which the bond failed under shear was recordedand fracture site on the specimens was tested by visual examination and reflecting light microscope. Thedata were statistically analyzed using one–way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Duncan’s Multiple RangeTest and Chi–square test. Results: All surface treatments caused significantly increase (p < 0.0001) in SBS.Chloroform caused significantly higher SBS, and untreated group showed significantly lower SBS. Mixedfailure mode was predominant in groups with higher SBS, while adhesive failure mode was predominant ingroups with lower SBS. Conclusions: All surface treatments (Monomer, Kooliner monomer, acetone, chloroform)achieved significantly higher SBS.
topic shear strength
reline resin
denture base resin
bond strength
url https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9110_647195c2f7e5143a90973701ed43f5e0.html
work_keys_str_mv AT radhwanhhasan shearbondstrengthofhardchairsiderelinematerialtodenturebasematerial
_version_ 1724844755550994432