The Relationship Between Central Auditory Tests and Neurocognitive Domains in Adults Living With HIV

Objective: Tests requiring central auditory processing, such as speech perception-in-noise, are simple, time efficient, and correlate with cognitive processing. These tests may be useful for tracking brain function. Doing this effectively requires information on which tests correlate with overall co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher E. Niemczak, Jonathan D. Lichtenstein, Albert Magohe, Jennifer T. Amato, Abigail M. Fellows, Jiang Gui, Michael Huang, Catherine C. Rieke, Enica R. Massawe, Michael J. Boivin, Ndeserua Moshi, Jay C. Buckey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
HIV
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.696513/full
id doaj-8c611d44f30349018869b048e4d9b17e
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher E. Niemczak
Jonathan D. Lichtenstein
Jonathan D. Lichtenstein
Albert Magohe
Jennifer T. Amato
Jennifer T. Amato
Abigail M. Fellows
Jiang Gui
Michael Huang
Catherine C. Rieke
Catherine C. Rieke
Enica R. Massawe
Michael J. Boivin
Ndeserua Moshi
Jay C. Buckey
Jay C. Buckey
spellingShingle Christopher E. Niemczak
Jonathan D. Lichtenstein
Jonathan D. Lichtenstein
Albert Magohe
Jennifer T. Amato
Jennifer T. Amato
Abigail M. Fellows
Jiang Gui
Michael Huang
Catherine C. Rieke
Catherine C. Rieke
Enica R. Massawe
Michael J. Boivin
Ndeserua Moshi
Jay C. Buckey
Jay C. Buckey
The Relationship Between Central Auditory Tests and Neurocognitive Domains in Adults Living With HIV
Frontiers in Neuroscience
HIV
cognition
central auditory processing
attention
auditory disease
cognitive processing speed
author_facet Christopher E. Niemczak
Jonathan D. Lichtenstein
Jonathan D. Lichtenstein
Albert Magohe
Jennifer T. Amato
Jennifer T. Amato
Abigail M. Fellows
Jiang Gui
Michael Huang
Catherine C. Rieke
Catherine C. Rieke
Enica R. Massawe
Michael J. Boivin
Ndeserua Moshi
Jay C. Buckey
Jay C. Buckey
author_sort Christopher E. Niemczak
title The Relationship Between Central Auditory Tests and Neurocognitive Domains in Adults Living With HIV
title_short The Relationship Between Central Auditory Tests and Neurocognitive Domains in Adults Living With HIV
title_full The Relationship Between Central Auditory Tests and Neurocognitive Domains in Adults Living With HIV
title_fullStr The Relationship Between Central Auditory Tests and Neurocognitive Domains in Adults Living With HIV
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship Between Central Auditory Tests and Neurocognitive Domains in Adults Living With HIV
title_sort relationship between central auditory tests and neurocognitive domains in adults living with hiv
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Objective: Tests requiring central auditory processing, such as speech perception-in-noise, are simple, time efficient, and correlate with cognitive processing. These tests may be useful for tracking brain function. Doing this effectively requires information on which tests correlate with overall cognitive function and specific cognitive domains. This study evaluated the relationship between selected central auditory focused tests and cognitive domains in a cohort of normal hearing adults living with HIV and HIV– controls. The long-term aim is determining the relationships between auditory processing and neurocognitive domains and applying this to analyzing cognitive function in HIV and other neurocognitive disorders longitudinally.Method: Subjects were recruited from an ongoing study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Central auditory measures included the Gap Detection Test (Gap), Hearing in Noise Test (HINT), and Triple Digit Test (TDT). Cognitive measures included variables from the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), Cogstate neurocognitive battery, and Kiswahili Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The measures represented three cognitive domains: processing speed, learning, and working memory. Bootstrap resampling was used to calculate the mean and standard deviation of the proportion of variance explained by the individual central auditory tests for each cognitive measure. The association of cognitive measures with central auditory variables taking HIV status and age into account was determined using regression models.Results: Hearing in Noise Tests and TDT were significantly associated with Cogstate learning and working memory tests. Gap was not significantly associated with any cognitive measure with age in the model. TDT explained the largest mean proportion of variance and had the strongest relationship to the MoCA and Cogstate tasks. With age in the model, HIV status did not affect the relationship between central auditory tests and cognitive measures. Age was strongly associated with multiple cognitive tests.Conclusion: Central auditory tests were associated with measures of learning and working memory. Compared to the other central auditory tests, TDT was most strongly related to cognitive function. These findings expand on the association between auditory processing and cognitive domains seen in other studies and support evaluating these tests for tracking brain health in HIV and other neurocognitive disorders.
topic HIV
cognition
central auditory processing
attention
auditory disease
cognitive processing speed
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.696513/full
work_keys_str_mv AT christophereniemczak therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jonathandlichtenstein therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jonathandlichtenstein therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT albertmagohe therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jennifertamato therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jennifertamato therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT abigailmfellows therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jianggui therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT michaelhuang therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT catherinecrieke therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT catherinecrieke therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT enicarmassawe therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT michaeljboivin therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT ndeseruamoshi therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jaycbuckey therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jaycbuckey therelationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT christophereniemczak relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jonathandlichtenstein relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jonathandlichtenstein relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT albertmagohe relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jennifertamato relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jennifertamato relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT abigailmfellows relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jianggui relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT michaelhuang relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT catherinecrieke relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT catherinecrieke relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT enicarmassawe relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT michaeljboivin relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT ndeseruamoshi relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jaycbuckey relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
AT jaycbuckey relationshipbetweencentralauditorytestsandneurocognitivedomainsinadultslivingwithhiv
_version_ 1716861869372735488
spelling doaj-8c611d44f30349018869b048e4d9b17e2021-10-01T09:25:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2021-09-011510.3389/fnins.2021.696513696513The Relationship Between Central Auditory Tests and Neurocognitive Domains in Adults Living With HIVChristopher E. Niemczak0Jonathan D. Lichtenstein1Jonathan D. Lichtenstein2Albert Magohe3Jennifer T. Amato4Jennifer T. Amato5Abigail M. Fellows6Jiang Gui7Michael Huang8Catherine C. Rieke9Catherine C. Rieke10Enica R. Massawe11Michael J. Boivin12Ndeserua Moshi13Jay C. Buckey14Jay C. Buckey15Space Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United StatesDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United StatesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Muhimibili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United StatesSpace Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United StatesDepartment of Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United StatesSpace Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United StatesSpace Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United StatesDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United StatesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Muhimibili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Muhimibili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaSpace Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United StatesDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United StatesObjective: Tests requiring central auditory processing, such as speech perception-in-noise, are simple, time efficient, and correlate with cognitive processing. These tests may be useful for tracking brain function. Doing this effectively requires information on which tests correlate with overall cognitive function and specific cognitive domains. This study evaluated the relationship between selected central auditory focused tests and cognitive domains in a cohort of normal hearing adults living with HIV and HIV– controls. The long-term aim is determining the relationships between auditory processing and neurocognitive domains and applying this to analyzing cognitive function in HIV and other neurocognitive disorders longitudinally.Method: Subjects were recruited from an ongoing study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Central auditory measures included the Gap Detection Test (Gap), Hearing in Noise Test (HINT), and Triple Digit Test (TDT). Cognitive measures included variables from the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), Cogstate neurocognitive battery, and Kiswahili Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The measures represented three cognitive domains: processing speed, learning, and working memory. Bootstrap resampling was used to calculate the mean and standard deviation of the proportion of variance explained by the individual central auditory tests for each cognitive measure. The association of cognitive measures with central auditory variables taking HIV status and age into account was determined using regression models.Results: Hearing in Noise Tests and TDT were significantly associated with Cogstate learning and working memory tests. Gap was not significantly associated with any cognitive measure with age in the model. TDT explained the largest mean proportion of variance and had the strongest relationship to the MoCA and Cogstate tasks. With age in the model, HIV status did not affect the relationship between central auditory tests and cognitive measures. Age was strongly associated with multiple cognitive tests.Conclusion: Central auditory tests were associated with measures of learning and working memory. Compared to the other central auditory tests, TDT was most strongly related to cognitive function. These findings expand on the association between auditory processing and cognitive domains seen in other studies and support evaluating these tests for tracking brain health in HIV and other neurocognitive disorders.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.696513/fullHIVcognitioncentral auditory processingattentionauditory diseasecognitive processing speed