‘Social Re-presentation for…’: An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations Research

Intergroup relations are of crucial importance in contemporary times, with concerns around social representations, social influence and collective action remaining salient. A core aspect of intergroup conflict revolves around the notion of joint projects, whereby different collectives seek to promot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luke J. Buhagiar, Gordon Sammut
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00352/full
id doaj-8c431452ca9f4aaf9089d253ad8f671c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c431452ca9f4aaf9089d253ad8f671c2020-11-25T02:36:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-03-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.00352494202‘Social Re-presentation for…’: An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations ResearchLuke J. Buhagiar0Gordon Sammut1Department of Psychology, University of Malta, Msida, MaltaDepartment of Criminology, University of Malta, Msida, MaltaIntergroup relations are of crucial importance in contemporary times, with concerns around social representations, social influence and collective action remaining salient. A core aspect of intergroup conflict revolves around the notion of joint projects, whereby different collectives seek to promote their own project through processes of joint intentionality. Nonetheless, we contend that intergroup relations research can tackle the notion of projects more fruitfully by studying the mutual understandings of projects of groups in conflict. Accordingly, we propose an action-oriented reformulation for intergroup relations research, which is contrasted with the standard object-oriented formula. Object-oriented research either (a) emphasizes the study of social objects without regard for their different construal by members of conflicting groups, or (b) focuses on ‘social representations of’ the objects in question, without regard for the projects that such representations serve. Contrastingly, action-oriented research (a) seeks to understand a collective’s ‘social re-presentation for’ a specific project; and (b) studies the social and alternative re-presentation of objects and projects as a systemic product of intergroup relations. We then present illustrative examples of object-oriented research, followed by a study concerning Arab-Maltese relations in Malta as an example of action-oriented research. We end by making recommendations for future research on intergroup relations, with the aim of shedding light on the processes that bind coalitions for collective action.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00352/fullsocial representationsprojectcollective actionintergroup relationsalternative representationsjoint intentionality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luke J. Buhagiar
Gordon Sammut
spellingShingle Luke J. Buhagiar
Gordon Sammut
‘Social Re-presentation for…’: An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations Research
Frontiers in Psychology
social representations
project
collective action
intergroup relations
alternative representations
joint intentionality
author_facet Luke J. Buhagiar
Gordon Sammut
author_sort Luke J. Buhagiar
title ‘Social Re-presentation for…’: An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations Research
title_short ‘Social Re-presentation for…’: An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations Research
title_full ‘Social Re-presentation for…’: An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations Research
title_fullStr ‘Social Re-presentation for…’: An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations Research
title_full_unstemmed ‘Social Re-presentation for…’: An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations Research
title_sort ‘social re-presentation for…’: an action-oriented formula for intergroup relations research
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Intergroup relations are of crucial importance in contemporary times, with concerns around social representations, social influence and collective action remaining salient. A core aspect of intergroup conflict revolves around the notion of joint projects, whereby different collectives seek to promote their own project through processes of joint intentionality. Nonetheless, we contend that intergroup relations research can tackle the notion of projects more fruitfully by studying the mutual understandings of projects of groups in conflict. Accordingly, we propose an action-oriented reformulation for intergroup relations research, which is contrasted with the standard object-oriented formula. Object-oriented research either (a) emphasizes the study of social objects without regard for their different construal by members of conflicting groups, or (b) focuses on ‘social representations of’ the objects in question, without regard for the projects that such representations serve. Contrastingly, action-oriented research (a) seeks to understand a collective’s ‘social re-presentation for’ a specific project; and (b) studies the social and alternative re-presentation of objects and projects as a systemic product of intergroup relations. We then present illustrative examples of object-oriented research, followed by a study concerning Arab-Maltese relations in Malta as an example of action-oriented research. We end by making recommendations for future research on intergroup relations, with the aim of shedding light on the processes that bind coalitions for collective action.
topic social representations
project
collective action
intergroup relations
alternative representations
joint intentionality
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00352/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lukejbuhagiar socialrepresentationforanactionorientedformulaforintergrouprelationsresearch
AT gordonsammut socialrepresentationforanactionorientedformulaforintergrouprelationsresearch
_version_ 1724798192705339392