Trauma Stories as Resilience: Armenian and Irish National Identity in a Century of Remembering

This paper explores the intersection of trauma, memory, and identity through the lens of resilience. Here we take resilience in its multiple, even conflicting meanings and resonances – encompassing continuity, persistence, and adaptation. Through the case studies of centenary commemorations in Armen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sevan Beukian, Rebecca Graff-McRae
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2018-06-01
Series:Studi Irlandesi : a Journal of Irish Studies
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-sijis/article/view/7318
id doaj-8c1cd7a821a046b2a40b6af1d7c8e875
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c1cd7a821a046b2a40b6af1d7c8e8752020-11-25T03:27:01ZengFirenze University PressStudi Irlandesi : a Journal of Irish Studies2239-39782018-06-018810.13128/SIJIS-2239-3978-2337419050Trauma Stories as Resilience: Armenian and Irish National Identity in a Century of RememberingSevan Beukian0Rebecca Graff-McRaeLaboratorio editoriale OA / Dip. LILSIThis paper explores the intersection of trauma, memory, and identity through the lens of resilience. Here we take resilience in its multiple, even conflicting meanings and resonances – encompassing continuity, persistence, and adaptation. Through the case studies of centenary commemorations in Armenia and Ireland and Northern Ireland, we highlight the ways in which the memory of traumatic historical events both reproduces and challenges dominant narratives of identity. The resilience of memory – its ability to adapt and evolve even as it lays claim to continuity – marks commemoration as a form of haunting, a return with difference that always disrupts the very borders it is deployed to secure. By focusing on resilience understood as the counter-memory that challenges the silencing and overshadowing of mainstream memory, we conclude that it manifests differently in such different cases, and find a surprising point of similarity: the resilience of memory is that it remains. Regardless of claims to timelessness or modernization, the vital function of memory is to persist, to linger, as the trace of the ashes of the conflicted past. In the two cases we look at, the resilience is expressed through counter-memory politics. Through this reflection on two very different cases, we gesture towards a theory of commemoration as resilience that has political implications for post-conflict and post-trauma states. https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-sijis/article/view/7318
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sevan Beukian
Rebecca Graff-McRae
spellingShingle Sevan Beukian
Rebecca Graff-McRae
Trauma Stories as Resilience: Armenian and Irish National Identity in a Century of Remembering
Studi Irlandesi : a Journal of Irish Studies
author_facet Sevan Beukian
Rebecca Graff-McRae
author_sort Sevan Beukian
title Trauma Stories as Resilience: Armenian and Irish National Identity in a Century of Remembering
title_short Trauma Stories as Resilience: Armenian and Irish National Identity in a Century of Remembering
title_full Trauma Stories as Resilience: Armenian and Irish National Identity in a Century of Remembering
title_fullStr Trauma Stories as Resilience: Armenian and Irish National Identity in a Century of Remembering
title_full_unstemmed Trauma Stories as Resilience: Armenian and Irish National Identity in a Century of Remembering
title_sort trauma stories as resilience: armenian and irish national identity in a century of remembering
publisher Firenze University Press
series Studi Irlandesi : a Journal of Irish Studies
issn 2239-3978
publishDate 2018-06-01
description This paper explores the intersection of trauma, memory, and identity through the lens of resilience. Here we take resilience in its multiple, even conflicting meanings and resonances – encompassing continuity, persistence, and adaptation. Through the case studies of centenary commemorations in Armenia and Ireland and Northern Ireland, we highlight the ways in which the memory of traumatic historical events both reproduces and challenges dominant narratives of identity. The resilience of memory – its ability to adapt and evolve even as it lays claim to continuity – marks commemoration as a form of haunting, a return with difference that always disrupts the very borders it is deployed to secure. By focusing on resilience understood as the counter-memory that challenges the silencing and overshadowing of mainstream memory, we conclude that it manifests differently in such different cases, and find a surprising point of similarity: the resilience of memory is that it remains. Regardless of claims to timelessness or modernization, the vital function of memory is to persist, to linger, as the trace of the ashes of the conflicted past. In the two cases we look at, the resilience is expressed through counter-memory politics. Through this reflection on two very different cases, we gesture towards a theory of commemoration as resilience that has political implications for post-conflict and post-trauma states.
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-sijis/article/view/7318
work_keys_str_mv AT sevanbeukian traumastoriesasresiliencearmenianandirishnationalidentityinacenturyofremembering
AT rebeccagraffmcrae traumastoriesasresiliencearmenianandirishnationalidentityinacenturyofremembering
_version_ 1724589873086595072